The role of transmural ventricular heterogeneities in cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Transmural electrophysiological heterogeneities have been shown to contribute to arrhythmia induction in the heart; however, their role in defibrillation failure has never been examined. The goal of this study is to investigate how transmural heterogeneities in ionic currents and gap-junctional coupling contribute to arrhythmia generation following defibrillation strength shocks. This study used a 3D anatomically realistic bidomain model of the rabbit ventricles. Transmural heterogeneity in ionic currents and reduced sub-epicardial intercellular coupling were incorporated based on experimental data. The ventricles were paced apically, and truncated-exponential monophasic shocks of varying strength and timing were applied via large external electrodes. Simulations demonstrate that inclusion of transmural heterogeneity in ionic currents results in an increase in vulnerability to shocks, reflected in the increased upper limit of vulnerability, ULV, and the enlarged vulnerable window, VW. These changes in vulnerability stem from increased post-shock dispersion in repolarisation as it increases the likelihood of establishment of re-entrant circuits. In contrast, reduced sub-epicardial coupling results in decrease in both ULV and VW. This decrease is caused by altered virtual electrode polarisation around the region of sub-epicardal uncoupling, and specifically, by the increase in (1) the amount of positively polarised myocardium at shock-end and (2) the spatial extent of post-shock wavefronts.

[1]  M. Rosen,et al.  The Controversial M Cell , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  Cellular basis for the normal T wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long-QT syndrome. , 1998, Circulation.

[3]  Natalia A. Trayanova,et al.  Advances in Modeling Cardiac Defibrillation , 2003, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[4]  L. Clerc Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Action potential prolongation and potassium currents in left-ventricular myocytes isolated from hypertrophied rabbit hearts. , 1998, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[6]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Ionic Current Basis of Electrocardiographic Waveforms: A Model Study , 2002, Circulation research.

[7]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Characteristics of the delayed rectifier current (IKr and IKs) in canine ventricular epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes. A weaker IKs contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell. , 1995, Circulation research.

[8]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Modulated dispersion explains changes in arrhythmia vulnerability during premature stimulation of the heart. , 1998, Circulation.

[9]  C. Luo,et al.  A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. , 1994, Circulation research.

[10]  J. Jalife,et al.  Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside , 1990 .

[11]  J. Fish,et al.  Electrical heterogeneity within the ventricular wall , 2001, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[12]  Itsuo Kodama,et al.  Two components of delayed rectifier K+ current in heart: molecular basis, functional diversity, and contribution to repolarization. , 2004, Acta pharmacologica Sinica.

[13]  Felipe Aguel,et al.  Computer simulations of cardiac defibrillation: a look inside the heart , 2002 .

[14]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[15]  D. Zipes,et al.  Functional and transmural modulation of M cell behavior in canine ventricular wall. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[16]  Craig S Henriquez,et al.  Electrotonic influences on action potential duration dispersion in small hearts: a simulation study. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[17]  Gerard van Herpen,et al.  The U wave in the electrocardiogram: a solution for a 100-year-old riddle. , 2005, Cardiovascular research.

[18]  S. N. Healy,et al.  Proarrhythmic Consequences of a KCNQ1 AKAP-Binding Domain Mutation: Computational Models of Whole Cells and Heterogeneous Tissue , 2004, Circulation research.

[19]  J. Saffitz,et al.  Transmural Distribution of Connexins in Rodent Hearts , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[20]  Natalia Trayanova,et al.  Cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks during phase 1A of acute global ischemia. , 2004, Heart rhythm.

[21]  H. Strauss,et al.  Regional localization of ERG, the channel protein responsible for the rapid component of the delayed rectifier, K+ current in the ferret heart. , 1997, Circulation research.

[22]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[23]  P. S. Chen,et al.  Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks , 2005, Circulation research.

[25]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[26]  P. Kowey,et al.  Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Decreases Slowly but Not Rapidly Activating Delayed Rectifier Potassium Currents of Epicardial and Endocardial Myocytes in Rabbits , 2001, Circulation.

[27]  A. Pollard,et al.  Electrotonic suppression of early afterdepolarizations in isolated rabbit Purkinje myocytes. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[28]  CHARLES ANTZELEVITCH,et al.  The M Cell: , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[29]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. , 1998, Circulation.

[30]  P Taggart,et al.  Transmural repolarisation in the left ventricle in humans during normoxia and ischaemia. , 2001, Cardiovascular research.

[31]  B. Surawicz,et al.  Characteristics and Possible Mechanism of Ventricular Arrhythmia Dependent on the Dispersion of Action Potential Durations , 1983, Circulation.

[32]  N S Peters,et al.  Disturbed connexin43 gap junction distribution correlates with the location of reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of healing canine infarcts that cause ventricular tachycardia. , 1997, Circulation.

[33]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  Ionic mechanisms responsible for the electrocardiographic phenotype of the Brugada syndrome are temperature dependent. , 1999, Circulation research.

[34]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Heterogeneous connexin43 expression produces electrophysiological heterogeneities across ventricular wall. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[35]  F. Charpentier,et al.  Electrophysiologic characteristics of cells spanning the left ventricular wall of human heart: evidence for presence of M cells. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  P D Wolf,et al.  Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. , 1986, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[37]  R. Ideker,et al.  Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves. , 1995, Circulation.

[38]  T Liu,et al.  Ventricular hypertrophy amplifies transmural repolarization dispersion and induces early afterdepolarization. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[39]  M. Rosen,et al.  Regional differences in electrophysiological properties of epicardium, midmyocardium, and endocardium. In vitro and in vivo correlations. , 1996, Circulation.

[40]  Ruben Coronel,et al.  Intercellular coupling through gap junctions masks M cells in the human heart. , 2004, Cardiovascular research.

[41]  A V Holden,et al.  Dynamical and cellular electrophysiological mechanisms of ECG changes during ischaemia. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Godfrey L. Smith,et al.  Heterogeneous changes in action potential and intracellular Ca2+ in left ventricular myocyte sub-types from rabbits with heart failure. , 2000, Cardiovascular research.

[43]  Robert A. Malkin,et al.  A simulation study evaluating the performance of high-density electrode arrays on myocardial tissue , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Natalia Trayanova,et al.  Analysis of Electrically Induced Reentrant Circuits in a Sheet of Myocardium , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  P. C. Viswanathan,et al.  Effects of IKr and IKs heterogeneity on action potential duration and its rate dependence: a simulation study. , 1999, Circulation.

[46]  H. Wellens,et al.  Repolarizing K+ currents ITO1 and IKs are larger in right than left canine ventricular midmyocardium. , 1999, Circulation.

[47]  D. Zipes State of the Journal 2003 , 2004 .

[48]  P. Wolf,et al.  Transmural Action Potential Repolarization Heterogeneity Develops Postnatally in the Rabbit , 2004 .

[49]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of regional cardiac function: a model of rabbit ventricular anatomy. , 1998, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[50]  F. J. Claydon,et al.  Patterns of and mechanisms for shock-induced polarization in the heart: a bidomain analysis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.