Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering

Random noise attenuation always plays an important role in seismic data processing. One of the most widely used methods for suppressing random noise is f − x predictive filtering. When the subsurface structure becomes complex, this method suffers from higher prediction errors owing to the large number of different dip components that need to be predicted. In this paper, we propose a novel denoising method termed f − x empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering (EMDPF). This new scheme solves the problem that makes f − x empirical mode decomposition (EMD) ineffective with complex seismic data. Also, by making the prediction more precise, the new scheme removes the limitation of conventional f − x predictive filtering when dealing with multi-dip seismic profiles. In this new method, we first apply EMD to each frequency slice in the f − x domain and obtain several intrinsic mode functions (IMF). Then an autoregressive (AR) model is applied to the sum of the first few IMFs, which contain the high-dip-angle components, in order to predict the useful steeper events. Finally, the predicted events are added to the sum of the remaining IMFs. This process improves the prediction precision by utilizing an EMD based dip filter to reduce the dip components before f − x predictive filtering. Both synthetic and real data sets demonstrate the performance of our proposed method in preserving more useful energy.

[1]  S. M. Doherty,et al.  Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data , 2000 .

[2]  R. Neelamani,et al.  Coherent and random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform , 2008 .

[3]  M. Kopecký Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: Image Data Analysis with White-noise Reflection , 2010 .

[4]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Seismic data sampling and wavefield representation — Introduction , 2010 .

[6]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[7]  Mao Jian,et al.  On the denoising method of prestack seismic data in wavelet domain , 2006 .

[8]  Guochang Liu,et al.  Stacking seismic data using local correlation , 2009 .

[9]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Random and coherent noise attenuation by empirical mode decomposition , 2009 .

[10]  T. Ulrych,et al.  Physical Wavelet Frame Denoising , 2003 .

[11]  M. Baan,et al.  Local singular value decomposition for signal enhancement of seismic data , 2007 .

[12]  W. Harry Mayne,et al.  Common Reflection Point Horizontal Data Stacking Techniques , 1962 .

[13]  Sven Treitel,et al.  The complex Wiener filter , 1974 .

[14]  Zhang Zhi Research on Application of Polynomial Fitting Technique in Highly noisy Seismic Data , 2006 .

[15]  Yang Liu,et al.  Seislet transform and seislet frame , 2010 .

[16]  P. E. Harris,et al.  Improving the performance of f-x prediction filtering at low signal-to-noise ratios , 1997 .

[17]  Zhenhua He,et al.  Seismic data denoising based on mixed time-frequency methods , 2011 .

[18]  L. Guo,et al.  High-order seislet transform and its application of random noise attenuation , 2009 .

[19]  L. Canales Random Noise Reduction , 1984 .

[20]  Patrick Flandrin,et al.  A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[21]  Peiwen Que,et al.  Noise suppression and flaw detection of ultrasonic signals via empirical mode decomposition , 2007 .

[22]  Guoxiong Wu,et al.  Impacts of Anomalies of Thermal State over the Qinghai‐Xizang Plateau and Sea Surface Temperature on Interannual Variability of the Asian Monsoon Seasonal Transition , 2006 .

[23]  Steve McLaughlin,et al.  Development of EMD-Based Denoising Methods Inspired by Wavelet Thresholding , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[24]  Guochang Liu,et al.  Seismic Noise Attenuation Using Nonstationary Polynomial Fitting , 2010 .

[25]  Zhi-peng Liu,et al.  Noncausal spatial prediction filtering based on an ARMA model , 2009 .

[26]  R. Kumaresan,et al.  Estimation of frequencies of multiple sinusoids: Making linear prediction perform like maximum likelihood , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Jin‐Tian Gao,et al.  Distribution of Geomagnetic Field and Its Secular Variations Expressed by the Surface Spline Method in China (A Part) for 1900–1936 , 2006 .