Optimization of multiple-impulse, multiple-revolution, rendezvous-phasing maneuvers

A new hybrid optimization approach is proposed for the design of a rendezvous-phasing strategy with combined maneuvers, which is normally considered as a complex multiple-impulse, multiple-revolution, nonlinear rendezvous problem. In this approach, a feasible iteration optimization model is first formulated using a multiple-revolution Lambert algorithm, and a parallel simulated annealing algorithm is employed to locate the unperturbed solution. Subsequently, an infeasible iteration optimization model accounting for trajectory perturbations is formulated, and a sequential quadratic programming algorithm is used to obtain the perturbed solution, with the unperturbed solution as an initial reference solution. The global convergence ability of the proposed approach is verified by solving a classical same-circle rendezvous problem. Two different solutions satisfying Lawden's necessary optimality conditions are located and one solution outperforms an optimal solution previously reported. The proposed approach is further evaluated in a practical two-day rendezvous-phasing mission with different initial conditions. It is shown that this approach is effective and efficient and the combined maneuvers can save propellant at a range of 4-35% when compared with the special-point maneuvers.

[1]  D. J. Jezewski,et al.  An efficient method for calculating optimal free-space n-impulse trajectories. , 1968 .

[2]  Guido Colasurdo,et al.  Indirect Optimization Method for Impulsive Transfers , 1994 .

[3]  Derek F Lawden,et al.  Optimal trajectories for space navigation , 1964 .

[4]  M. Handelsman,et al.  Primer Vector on Fixed-Time Impulsive Trajectories , 1967 .

[5]  Suzannah Sandrik Primer-Optimized Results and Trends for Circular Phasing and Other Circle-to-Circle Impulsive Coplanar Rendezvous , 2006 .

[6]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[7]  Guo-Jin Tang,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of Perturbed Impulsive Rendezvous Trajectories Using Physical Programming , 2008 .

[8]  Ya-zhong Luo,et al.  Hybrid Approach to Optimize a Rendezvous Phasing Strategy , 2007 .

[9]  Wigbert Fehse,et al.  Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft , 2003 .

[10]  John E. Trussing A Class of Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions , 2000 .

[11]  Steven P. Hughes,et al.  A Comparison of Trajectory Optimization Methods for the Impulsive Minimum Fuel Rendezvous Problem , 2002 .

[12]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions , 2003 .

[13]  Guo-Jin Tang,et al.  Parallel Simulated Annealing Using Simplex Method , 2004 .

[14]  John E. Prussing,et al.  Optimal Multiple-Impulse Direct Ascent Fixed-Time Rendezvous , 1974 .

[15]  John E. Prussing,et al.  Optimal multiple-impulse time-fixed rendezvous between circular orbits , 1984 .

[16]  E. Fehlberg Classical Fifth-, Sixth-, Seventh-, and Eighth-Order Runge-Kutta Formulas with Stepsize Control , 1968 .