Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias

Donation payment mechanisms are well suited forsome contingent valuation studies. In aneffort to better understand the discrepancythat has been consistently found between actualand hypothetical donations, we investigate anapproach to estimating actual willingness todonate using contingent donations with afollow-up question in which respondents ratethe level of certainty about their response tothe contingent donation question. The approachallows us to estimate the magnitude of thehypothetical bias and identify the respondentsresponsible for the bias. Identification ofthe respondents responsible for thehypothetical bias is the first step towarddeveloping an understanding of the causes andpossible remedies. In this study we find thatmost of the respondents (80%) to thecontingent donation question provide a responseconsistent with how we predict they wouldrespond in an actual donation situation.

[1]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  J. Bennett,et al.  Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1999 .

[3]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  CAN HYPOTHETICAL, QUESTIONS PREDICT ACTUAL, PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROGRAMS? A FIELD VALIDITY TEST USING A PROVISION POINT MECHANISM , 1997 .

[4]  W. Hutchinson,et al.  Some Further Implications of Incorporating the Warm Glow of Giving into Welfare Measures: A Comment on the Use of Donation Mechanisms by Champet al. , 1999 .

[5]  G. Marwell,et al.  Economists free ride, does anyone else? : Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV , 1981 .

[6]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .

[7]  R. Ready,et al.  How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? , 2001, Land Economics.

[8]  K. A. Smith.  Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel''s , 1998 .

[9]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .

[10]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[11]  Jon Strand,et al.  Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment , 1990 .

[12]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent , 1995 .

[13]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good , 1996 .

[14]  Christopher J. Miller,et al.  Valuing Water Quality Monitoring: A Contingent Valuation Experiment Involving Hypothetical and Real Payments , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[15]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  Valuing Environmental Commodities: Some Recent Experiments , 1981 .

[16]  J. Loomis,et al.  Comparing the Economic Value of Reducing Fire Risk to Spotted Owl Habitat in California and Oregon , 1997 .

[17]  Clive Jones,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Real Economic Commitments: Evidence from Electric Utility Green Pricing Programmes , 1999 .