A Classification of Human-to-Human Communication during the Use of Immersive Teleoperation Interfaces

We propose a new classification of the human-to-human communication during the use of immersive teleoperation interfaces based on real-life examples. While a large body of research is concerned with communication in collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), less research focuses on cases where only one of two communicating users is immersed in a virtual or remote environment. Furthermore, we identify the unmediated communication between co-located users of an immersive teleoperation interface as another conceptually important -- but usually neglected -- case. To cover these scenarios, one of the dimensions of the proposed classification is the level of copresence of the communicating users. Further dimensions are the virtuality of the immersive environment, the virtual transport of the immersed user(s), the communication channel, and the mediation of the communication. We find that an extension of the proposed classification to real environments can offer useful reference cases. Using this extended classification not only allows us to discuss and understand differences and similarities of various forms of communication in a more systematic way, but it also provides guidelines and reference cases for the design of immersive teleoperation interfaces that support human-to-human communication.

[1]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Virtual Interactive Presence and Augmented Reality (VIPAR) for Remote Surgical Assistance , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Communication channels and awareness cues in collocated collaborative time-critical gaming , 2012, CSCW.

[3]  Oliver Otto,et al.  A review on effective closely-coupled collaboration using immersive CVE's , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[4]  Steve Benford,et al.  Collaborative virtual environments , 2001, CACM.

[5]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Nonverbal communication interface for collaborative virtual environments , 1999, Virtual Reality.

[6]  Nina Wakeford,et al.  The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[7]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Martin Møller Jensen,et al.  Stereoscopic augmented reality system for supervised training on minimal invasive surgery robots , 2014, VRIC.

[9]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[10]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  Readings in human-computer interaction : toward the year 2000 , 1995 .

[11]  John C. Tang Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Ralph Schroeder Social Interaction in Virtual Environments: Key Issues, Common Themes, and a Framework for Research , 2005 .

[13]  Fumio Kishino,et al.  Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum , 1995, Other Conferences.

[14]  Jari Takatalo,et al.  Measuring mediated communication experience , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[15]  Martin Kraus,et al.  Using a Graphics Turing Test to Evaluate the Effect of Frame Rate and Motion Blur on Telepresence of Animated Objects , 2013, GRAPP/IVAPP.

[16]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Peepholes: low cost awareness of one's community , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[17]  Steve Benford,et al.  Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries , 1998, TCHI.