Skill complementarity enhances heterophily in collaboration networks

Much empirical evidence shows that individuals usually exhibit significant homophily in social networks. We demonstrate, however, skill complementarity enhances heterophily in the formation of collaboration networks, where people prefer to forge social ties with people who have professions different from their own. We construct a model to quantify the heterophily by assuming that individuals choose collaborators to maximize utility. Using a huge database of online societies, we find evidence of heterophily in collaboration networks. The results of model calibration confirm the presence of heterophily. Both empirical analysis and model calibration show that the heterophilous feature is persistent along the evolution of online societies. Furthermore, the degree of skill complementarity is positively correlated with their production output. Our work sheds new light on the scientific research utility of virtual worlds for studying human behaviors in complex socioeconomic systems.

[1]  Luís M. A. Bettencourt,et al.  Professional diversity and the productivity of cities , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  The Mapping Principle, and a Research Framework for Virtual Worlds , 2010 .

[3]  Edward Castronova,et al.  On the Research Value of Large Games , 2005, Games Cult..

[4]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[5]  Michael Szell,et al.  Social Dynamics in a Large-Scale Online Game , 2012, Adv. Complex Syst..

[6]  Michael Szell,et al.  Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Triadic closure dynamics drives scaling laws in social multiplex networks , 2013, 1301.0259.

[8]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[9]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  Michael Szell,et al.  Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Michael Szell,et al.  Emergence of Good Conduct, Scaling and Zipf Laws in Human Behavioral Sequences in an Online World , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Dirk C. Keene.  Acknowledgements , 1975 .

[14]  Marco Conti,et al.  The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[15]  Subhasish Dugar,et al.  Partnership Formation: The Role of Social Status , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[16]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Settlement scaling and increasing returns in an ancient society , 2015, Science Advances.

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Friendship networks and social status , 2012, Network Science.

[18]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers , 2011, Nature.

[19]  George E. Tita,et al.  Human group formation in online guilds and offline gangs driven by a common team dynamic. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Fractal multi-level organisation of human groups in a virtual world , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M. Jackson,et al.  An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation , 2007 .

[22]  D Cvijovicacute,et al.  Taboo search: an approach to the multiple minima problem. , 1995, Science.

[23]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[24]  Paolo Pin,et al.  Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? , 2013, Human Nature.

[26]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[27]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Popularity versus similarity in growing networks , 2011, Nature.

[29]  Zhi-Qiang Jiang,et al.  Online-offline activities and game-playing behaviors of avatars in a massive multiplayer online role-playing game , 2009, ArXiv.

[30]  Yu Xie,et al.  Structural effect of size on interracial friendship , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Michele Benzi,et al.  The Physics of Communicability in Complex Networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[32]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[33]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[35]  Zhi-Qiang Jiang,et al.  Triadic motifs in the dependence networks of virtual societies , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Adam Smith,et al.  The Wealth of Nations , 1999 .

[37]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[38]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[39]  Andrzej Grabowski,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE STRUCTURE OF A SOCIAL NETWORK AND HUMAN DYNAMICS IN A VIRTUAL SOCIETY , 2007 .

[40]  J. Moody.  Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Michael Szell,et al.  How women organize social networks different from men , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[42]  W. Bainbridge.  The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds , 2007, Science.

[43]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[44]  J. Coleman.  Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods , 1958 .

[45]  Vito Latora,et al.  Understanding mobility in a social petri dish , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Eric T Lofgren,et al.  The untapped potential of virtual game worlds to shed light on real world epidemics. , 2007, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[47]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[48]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.