Strain-enhanced stress relaxation impacts nonlinear elasticity in collagen gels

Significance The extracellular matrix is a complex assembly of structural proteins that provides physical support and biochemical signaling to cells within our tissues. One of the key structural components of the extracellular matrix is collagen, and matrices of collagen exhibit remarkable mechanical properties. Their resistance to deformation is enhanced as deformation is increased over short timescales, a behavior termed strain stiffening, yet they exhibit some characteristics of viscous fluids at longer timescales. Strikingly, we show that the strain stiffening of collagen matrices is coupled with their liquid-like behavior: at greater deformations, these matrices become stiffer but then flow more rapidly to relax this increase in stiffness. These complex mechanical behaviors are likely to be relevant to cellular interactions with these matrices. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex assembly of structural proteins that provides physical support and biochemical signaling to cells in tissues. The mechanical properties of the ECM have been found to play a key role in regulating cell behaviors such as differentiation and malignancy. Gels formed from ECM protein biopolymers such as collagen or fibrin are commonly used for 3D cell culture models of tissue. One of the most striking features of these gels is that they exhibit nonlinear elasticity, undergoing strain stiffening. However, these gels are also viscoelastic and exhibit stress relaxation, with the resistance of the gel to a deformation relaxing over time. Recent studies have suggested that cells sense and respond to both nonlinear elasticity and viscoelasticity of ECM, yet little is known about the connection between nonlinear elasticity and viscoelasticity. Here, we report that, as strain is increased, not only do biopolymer gels stiffen but they also exhibit faster stress relaxation, reducing the timescale over which elastic energy is dissipated. This effect is not universal to all biological gels and is mediated through weak cross-links. Mechanistically, computational modeling and atomic force microscopy (AFM) indicate that strain-enhanced stress relaxation of collagen gels arises from force-dependent unbinding of weak bonds between collagen fibers. The broader effect of strain-enhanced stress relaxation is to rapidly diminish strain stiffening over time. These results reveal the interplay between nonlinear elasticity and viscoelasticity in collagen gels, and highlight the complexity of the ECM mechanics that are likely sensed through cellular mechanotransduction.

[1]  K. Kroy,et al.  Resolving the Stiffening-Softening Paradox in Cell Mechanics , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[4]  Ray Vanderby,et al.  Viscoelastic Relaxation and Recovery of Tendon , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Collagen : structure and mechanics , 2008 .

[6]  Justin Cooper-White,et al.  The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[7]  Nicholas A. Kurniawan,et al.  Early stiffening and softening of collagen: interplay of deformation mechanisms in biopolymer networks. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Fibrillar structure and mechanical properties of collagen. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[10]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[11]  Stephen J. Weiss,et al.  Protease-dependent versus -independent cancer cell invasion programs: three-dimensional amoeboid movement revisited , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Contraction of hydrated collagen gels by fibroblasts: evidence for two mechanisms by which collagen fibrils are stabilized. , 1987, Collagen and related research.

[13]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices , 2010, Nature Methods.

[14]  Qi Wen,et al.  Effects of non-linearity on cell-ECM interactions. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[15]  Jens Glaser,et al.  Glass transition and rheological redundancy in F-actin solutions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D P Pioletti,et al.  On the independence of time and strain effects in the stress relaxation of ligaments and tendons. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Joseph W Freeman,et al.  Collagen self-assembly and the development of tendon mechanical properties. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Stress-relaxation behavior in gels with ionic and covalent crosslinks. , 2010, Journal of applied physics.

[19]  J. Zlatanova,et al.  Single molecule force spectroscopy in biology using the atomic force microscope. , 2000, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[21]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[22]  A. Rowan,et al.  Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment switch in soft responsive hydrogels. , 2016, Nature materials.

[23]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation , 2014, Nature materials.

[24]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[25]  D. Weitz,et al.  Strain history dependence of the nonlinear stress response of fibrin and collagen networks , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[27]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Multiscale Mechanics of Fibrin Polymer: Gel Stretching with Protein Unfolding and Loss of Water , 2009, Science.

[28]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[29]  David J Mooney,et al.  Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. , 2014, Nature materials.

[30]  Beth A Winkelstein,et al.  Preconditioning is correlated with altered collagen fiber alignment in ligament. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  Roberto Ballarini,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of isolated collagen fibrils. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[32]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cytoskeletal filament assembly and the control of cell spreading and function by extracellular matrix. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[34]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Stress controls the mechanics of collagen networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[36]  E. Dejana,et al.  PW1/Peg3 expression regulates key properties that determine mesoangioblast stem cell competence , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Non-Linear Elasticity of Extracellular Matrices Enables Contractile Cells to Communicate Local Position and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Radial Distribution Function of Semiflexible Polymers. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[39]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading , 2015, Nature Communications.

[41]  L. Sander,et al.  An algorithm for extracting the network geometry of three‐dimensional collagen gels , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[42]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Reversible stress softening of actin networks , 2007, Nature.

[44]  M. Guthold,et al.  The mechanical properties of single fibrin fibers , 2010, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[45]  K. Anseth,et al.  Biophysically Defined and Cytocompatible Covalently Adaptable Networks as Viscoelastic 3D Cell Culture Systems , 2014, Advances in Materials.

[46]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[47]  Wen Yang,et al.  On the tear resistance of skin , 2015, Nature Communications.

[48]  David A. Weitz,et al.  The micromechanics of three-dimensional collagen-I gels , 2008, Complex..

[49]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[50]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.