Quantification and improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio in a magnetic resonance image acquisition procedure.

[1]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[2]  Electron Microscopy in Material Science , 1971 .

[3]  U. Valdrè,et al.  Electron microscopy in material science , 1971 .

[4]  J. Frank,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio of electron micrographs obtained by cross correlation , 1975, Nature.

[5]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[6]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[8]  N. Bonnet.  On the use of correlation functions for improving the image signal-to-noise ratio , 1988 .

[9]  S. Holland.  MRI: Acceptance testing and quality control—The role of the clinical medical physicist , 1989 .

[10]  D. Ortendahl,et al.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[11]  Quantitative evaluation of the signal-to-noise ratio and of its improvement (or degradation) by digital filters , 1991 .

[12]  B. Murphy,et al.  Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers. , 1993, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[13]  Tianhu Lei,et al.  Statistical analysis of MR imaging and its applications in image modeling , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Steve McLaughlin,et al.  Comparative study of textural analysis techniques to characterise tissue from intravascular ultrasound , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.