Evolution of Surgical Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas

Introduction Wide variations exist in the management of craniopharyngiomas, including pituitary stalk preservation/sacrifice. This study examines the practice patterns over 16 years using the endoscopic endonasal approach for the resection of craniopharyngiomas and it examines the effects of stalk preservation. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted for 66 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for resection of craniopharyngiomas. Patients were stratified into three epochs: 2005 to 2009 (N = 20), 2010 to 2015 (N = 23), and 2016 to 2020 (N = 20), to examine the evolution of surgical outcomes. Subgroup analysis between stalk preservation/stalk sacrifice was conducted for rate of gross total resection, anterior pituitary function preservation, and development of new permanent diabetes insipidus. Results Gross total resection rates across the first, second, and third epochs were 20, 65, and 52%, respectively (p = 0.042). Stalk preservation across epochs were 100, 5.9, and 52.6% (p = 0.0001). New permanent diabetes insipidus did not significantly change across epochs (37.5, 68.4, 71.4%; p = 0.078). Preservation of normal endocrine function across epochs was 25, 0, and 23.8%; (p = 0.001). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks significantly decreased over time (40, 4.5, and 0%; [p = 0.0001]). Stalk preservation group retained higher normal endocrine function (40.9 vs. 0%; p = 0.001) and less normal-preoperative to postoperative panhypopituitarism (18.4 vs. 56%; p = 0.001). Stalk sacrifice group achieved higher GTR (70.8 vs. 28%, p = 0.005). At last follow-up, there was no difference in recurrence/progression rates between the two groups. Conclusion There is a continuous evolution in the management of craniopharyngiomas. Gross total resection, higher rates of pituitary stalk and hormonal preservation, and low rates of postoperative CSF leak can be achieved with increased surgical experience.

[1]  Andrew L. A. Garton,et al.  Long-term tumor control after endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: comparison of gross-total resection versus subtotal resection with radiation therapy. , 2021, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  Jun Pan,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial surgery for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas based on a new QST classification system: a comparative series of 315 patients. , 2021, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Descriptive Epidemiology of Craniopharyngiomas in the United States , 2021, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.

[4]  J. Almeida,et al.  Surgical anatomy and technical nuances of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the anterior cranial fossa. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgical sciences.

[5]  J. Bruce,et al.  Gross Total Versus Subtotal Surgical Resection in the Management of Craniopharyngiomas , 2020, Allergy & rhinology.

[6]  T. Schwartz,et al.  How long is the tail end of the learning curve? Results from 1000 consecutive endoscopic endonasal skull base cases following the initial 200 cases. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  H. Müller The Diagnosis and Treatment of Craniopharyngioma , 2019, Neuroendocrinology.

[8]  Edgar G. Ordóñez-Rubiano,et al.  Preserve or sacrifice the stalk? Endocrinological outcomes, extent of resection, and recurrence rates following endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  Tao Hong,et al.  A novel endoscopic classification for craniopharyngioma based on its origin , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Amir Ali Sepehry,et al.  Adult Craniopharyngioma: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.

[11]  Tao Xie,et al.  Learning curve for the endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas , 2017, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Klose,et al.  Visual outcome, endocrine function and tumor control after fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of craniopharyngiomas in adults: findings in a prospective cohort , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[13]  James J. Evans,et al.  The Learning Curve in Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas , 2016, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.

[14]  S. Alavi,et al.  The learning curve for endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. A single institution experience, Leeds, UK , 2017, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[15]  J. Pascual,et al.  Craniopharyngioma adherence: a comprehensive topographical categorization and outcome-related risk stratification model based on the methodical examination of 500 tumors. , 2016, Neurosurgical focus.

[16]  J. Sheehan,et al.  Multi-modality management of craniopharyngioma: a review of various treatments and their outcomes. , 2016, Neuro-oncology practice.

[17]  L. Fogg,et al.  Learning curve for the transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary tumors , 2016, British journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas. , 2015, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[19]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  S. Combs,et al.  Long term results after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients with craniopharyngioma: maximal tumor control with minimal side effects , 2014, Radiation Oncology.

[21]  F. Esposito,et al.  The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  Chengyuan Feng,et al.  Pituitary stalk management during the microsurgery of craniopharyngiomas , 2014, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[23]  N. Foreman,et al.  Patterns of Care for Craniopharyngioma: Survey of Members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons , 2014, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[24]  J. Fernandez-Miranda,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: surgical outcome in 64 patients. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  Yingying Lin,et al.  A Learning Curve of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma , 2013, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[26]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[27]  Theodore H Schwartz,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[28]  Garni Barkhoudarian,et al.  Craniopharyngioma: history , 2012, Pituitary.

[29]  I. Barani,et al.  Endocrinologic, neurologic, and visual morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[30]  Marc Rosen,et al.  Endoscopic repair of high‐flow cranial base defects using a bilayer button , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[31]  Rajwant Kaur,et al.  Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[32]  S. Puget,et al.  Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[33]  F. Saran,et al.  A multimodality approach to the treatment of craniopharyngiomas avoiding hypothalamic morbidity: a UK perspective. , 2006, Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM.

[34]  O. Dilek,et al.  The learning curve in endoscopic pituitary surgery and our experience , 2006, Neurosurgical Review.

[35]  M. Samii,et al.  Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas: a review. , 1997, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[36]  M. Yașargil,et al.  Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  H. Hoffman Craniopharyngiomas. , 1972, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.