Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?

Purpose We investigated whether people with homonymous hemianopia (HH) were able to spontaneously (without training or instructions) adapt their blind-side scan magnitudes in response to differing scanning requirements for detection of pedestrians in a driving simulator when differing cues about pedestrian eccentricities and movement behaviors were available in the seeing hemifield. Methods Twelve HH participants completed two sessions in a driving simulator pressing the horn when they detected a pedestrian. Stationary pedestrians outside the driving lane were presented in one session and approaching pedestrians on a collision course in the other. Gaze data were analyzed for pedestrians initially appearing at approximately 14° in the blind hemifield. No instructions were given regarding scanning. Results After appearing, the stationary pedestrians' eccentricity increased rapidly to a median of 31° after 2.5 seconds, requiring increasingly larger blind-side gaze scans for detection, while the approaching pedestrians' eccentricity remained constant at approximately 14°, requiring a more moderate scan (∼14°) for detection. Although median scan magnitudes did not differ between the two conditions (approaching: 14° [IQR 9°–15°]; stationary: 13° [IQR 9°–20°]; P = 0.43), three participants showed evidence of adapting (increasing) their blind-side scan magnitudes in the stationary condition. Conclusions Three participants (25%) appeared to be able to apply voluntary cognitive control to modify their blind-side gaze scanning in response to the differing scanning requirements of the two conditions without explicit training. Translational Relevance Our results suggest that only a minority of people with hemianopia are likely to be able to spontaneously adapt their blind-side scanning in response to rapidly changing and unpredictable situations in on-road driving.

[1]  Eli Peli,et al.  Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[2]  Callum Mole,et al.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? , 2015 .

[3]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Collision avoidance in persons with homonymous visual field defects under virtual reality conditions , 2012, Vision Research.

[4]  Gang Luo,et al.  The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[6]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Rehabilitation of reading and visual exploration in visual field disorders: transfer or specificity? , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Sven Ohl,et al.  Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation , 2015, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  Joost Heutink,et al.  The Effects of Compensatory Scanning Training on Mobility in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Alex R. Bowers,et al.  A Pilot Evaluation of On-Road Detection Performance by Drivers with Hemianopia Using Oblique Peripheral Prisms , 2012, Stroke research and treatment.

[10]  A. Hunt,et al.  Inefficient search strategies in simulated hemianopia. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  N. Newman,et al.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. , 2006, Neurology.

[12]  Gang Luo,et al.  Mobile gaze tracking system for outdoor walking behavioral studies , 2016, Journal of vision.

[13]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Are hemianopic reading and visual exploration impairments visually elicited? New insights from eye movements in simulated hemianopia , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A. Bowers,et al.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[15]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Differential impact of partial cortical blindness on gaze strategies when sitting and walking – An immersive virtual reality study , 2011, Vision Research.

[16]  Concetta F. Alberti,et al.  Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[18]  Eli Peli,et al.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  L. Gauthier,et al.  Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: Norms and discrimination power of two tests. , 1990 .

[20]  L. Stark,et al.  Most naturally occurring human saccades have magnitudes of 15 degrees or less. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[21]  N. Newman,et al.  Homonymous hemianopias , 2006, Neurology.