Engineering allostery.

Allosteric proteins have great potential in synthetic biology, but our limited understanding of the molecular underpinnings of allostery has hindered the development of designer molecules, including transcription factors with new DNA-binding or ligand-binding specificities that respond appropriately to inducers. Such allosteric proteins could function as novel switches in complex circuits, metabolite sensors, or as orthogonal regulators for independent, inducible control of multiple genes. Advances in DNA synthesis and next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled the assessment of millions of mutants in a single experiment, providing new opportunities to study allostery. Using the classic LacI protein as an example, we describe a genetic selection system using a bidirectional reporter to capture mutants in both allosteric states, allowing the positions most crucial for allostery to be identified. This approach is not limited to bacterial transcription factors, and could reveal new mechanistic insights and facilitate engineering of other major classes of allosteric proteins such as nuclear receptors, two-component systems, G protein-coupled receptors, and protein kinases.

[1]  J. Devito.  Recombineering with tolC as a Selectable/Counter-selectable Marker: remodeling the rRNA Operons of Escherichia coli , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity , 2013, Nature.

[3]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Biosensors of protein kinase action: from in vitro assays to living cells. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  Huiming Ding,et al.  Enhanced killing of antibiotic-resistant bacteria enabled by massively parallel combinatorial genetics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  A conformational switch in the ligand-binding domain regulates the dependence of the glucocorticoid receptor on Hsp90. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  M. Lewis,et al.  The lac repressor. , 2005, Comptes rendus biologies.

[8]  J H Miller,et al.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. XIII. Extensive amino acid replacements generated by the use of natural and synthetic nonsense suppressors. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  CHIP-MYTH: a novel interactive proteomics method for the assessment of agonist-dependent interactions of the human β₂-adrenergic receptor. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[10]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Perturbation from a distance: mutations that alter LacI function through long-range effects. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[11]  James J. Collins,et al.  Next-Generation Synthetic Gene Networks , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  May C Morris,et al.  Fluorescent biosensors - probing protein kinase function in cancer and drug discovery. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  M. Lewis,et al.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  K. Matthews,et al.  Flexibility in the inducer binding region is crucial for allostery in the Escherichia coli lactose repressor. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[15]  Nathaniel J. Traaseth,et al.  Allosteric cooperativity in protein kinase A , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Tsien,et al.  Circular permutation and receptor insertion within green fluorescent proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Transcription factor-based screens and synthetic selections for microbial small-molecule biosynthesis. , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[18]  L. Swint-Kruse,et al.  Multiple Co-Evolutionary Networks Are Supported by the Common Tertiary Scaffold of the LacI/GalR Proteins , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Michael Y. Galperin.  Structural Classification of Bacterial Response Regulators: Diversity of Output Domains and Domain Combinations , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  F. J. Poelwijk,et al.  The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Jeffrey M. Skerker,et al.  Systematic Dissection and Trajectory-Scanning Mutagenesis of the Molecular Interface That Ensures Specificity of Two-Component Signaling Pathways , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[22]  William Bourguet,et al.  A canonical structure for the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  A network of conserved interactions regulates the allosteric signal in a glutamine amidotransferase. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[24]  K. Fujishige,et al.  Robust in vitro affinity maturation strategy based on interface-focused high-throughput mutational scanning. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  The side-chain of the amino acid residue in position 110 of the Lac repressor influences its allosteric equilibrium. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  S. Freund,et al.  An ensemble view of thrombin allostery , 2012, Biological chemistry.

[27]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Contact rearrangements form coupled networks from local motions in allosteric proteins , 2008, Proteins.

[28]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Saturation Editing of Genomic Regions by Multiplex Homology-Directed Repair , 2014, Nature.

[29]  Olivier Lichtarge,et al.  Evolution-guided discovery and recoding of allosteric pathway specificity determinants in psychoactive bioamine receptors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  F. S. Mathews,et al.  Structural identification of the pathway of long-range communication in an allosteric enzyme , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  K. Nishikawa,et al.  Parallel evolution of ligand specificity between LacI/GalR family repressors and periplasmic sugar-binding proteins. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  N. Goodey,et al.  Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[33]  D. Baker,et al.  High Resolution Mapping of Protein Sequence–Function Relationships , 2010, Nature Methods.

[34]  M. Caron,et al.  Role of β-Arrestin in Mediating Agonist-Promoted G Protein-Coupled Receptor Internalization , 1996, Science.

[35]  Sriram Kosuri,et al.  Scalable gene synthesis by selective amplification of DNA pools from high-fidelity microchips , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  S. Fields,et al.  A fundamental protein property, thermodynamic stability, revealed solely from large-scale measurements of protein function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  M. Palmer,et al.  Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening Assay System for Monitoring G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation Using β-Galactosidase Enzyme Complementation Technology , 2002, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[38]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Genetic Studies of Lac Repressor: 4000 Single Amino Acid Substitutions and Analysis of the Resulting Phenotypes on the Basis of the Protein Structure , 1996, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[39]  Marc Ostermeier,et al.  Directed evolution of protein switches and their application to the creation of ligand-binding proteins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Precise Manipulation of Chromosomes in Vivo Enables Genome-Wide Codon Replacement , 2011, Science.

[41]  Vincent Laudet,et al.  Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[42]  S. Fields,et al.  Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science , 2014, Nature Methods.

[43]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Emerging methods in protein co-evolution , 2013 .

[44]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2000, Cell.

[45]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  Conformational Spread as a Mechanism for Cooperativity in the Bacterial Flagellar Switch , 2010, Science.

[46]  Rama Ranganathan,et al.  Structural Determinants of Allosteric Ligand Activation in RXR Heterodimers , 2004, Cell.

[47]  J. Tavernier,et al.  Diversity in Genetic In Vivo Methods for Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: from the Yeast Two-Hybrid System to the Mammalian Split-Luciferase System , 2012, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[48]  J. A. González-Vera.  Probing the Kinome in Real Time with Fluorescent Peptides , 2012 .

[49]  James O. Wrabl,et al.  Structural and energetic basis of allostery. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[50]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Activity-enhancing mutations in an E3 ubiquitin ligase identified by high-throughput mutagenesis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Tony Pawson,et al.  The mammalian-membrane two-hybrid assay (MaMTH) for probing membrane-protein interactions in human cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[52]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Coevolution of PDZ domain-ligand interactions analyzed by high-throughput phage display and deep sequencing. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.