Steel–concrete bonding connection: An experimental study and non-linear finite element analysis

Abstract We present characterisation interface tests results obtained by push-out tests adapted to a Steel–concrete bonded connection. The sizes of the concrete slabs and areas of the bonding zone are the primary studied parameters. It is shown that the behaviour observed during the push-out tests strongly depends on these parameters. Additionally, the measurements are compared to numerical results obtained from 3D FE models accounting for the non-linear behaviour of the constitutive materials. In particular, the numerical results confirm that the shear stress in the concrete slabs along the bonding joint and near the interface is not uniform and varies with the level of the applied load. Moreover, the shear stress may be accompanied by a strong compression stress perpendicular to the interface, which is mainly due to the possible friction between the bottom face of the concrete slabs and the steel rigid plate of the hydraulic press. This stress induces a favourable double state of stress in the bonding joint and a high failure load. Therefore, these tests and numerical results show that the state of stress in a push-out test is complex, varies with the load and seems to be most likely not representative of the state of stress in a flexural member. Consequently, the push-out test can be used as a way of characterising a Steel–concrete bonding connection that may be useful in comparing different adhesives or bonding processes; however, this test should be used very carefully for beam designs.

[1]  B. Jurkiewiez,et al.  Non linear behaviour of steel–concrete epoxy bonded composite beams , 2011 .

[2]  A. D. Crocombe,et al.  Non-linear adhesive bonded joint design analyses , 1990 .

[3]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors , 2009 .

[4]  Gert Heshe,et al.  DS/ENV 1992-1-1 NAD. National Application Document for Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 1993 .

[5]  J. Comyn,et al.  Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering , 1984, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[6]  Eugenio Dragoni,et al.  Standard finite element techniques for efficient stress analysis of adhesive joints , 2009 .

[7]  Yves Delmas,et al.  Experimental study of bonded steel concrete composite structures , 2007 .

[8]  Yves Delmas,et al.  Static behaviour of a full-scale steel–concrete beam with epoxy-bonding connection , 2008 .

[9]  J. F. Berthet,et al.  Evaluation of the adhesion resistance between steel and concrete by push out test , 2011 .

[10]  P. Hamelin,et al.  Concrete to steel lap joint failure criteria under combined shear and peeling stress , 2009 .

[11]  Gilles Pijaudier-Cabot,et al.  CONTINUUM DAMAGE THEORY - APPLICATION TO CONCRETE , 1989 .

[12]  L. J. Hart-Smith Chapter 19 – The design of adhesively bonded joints , 2002 .

[13]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Nonlocal damage theory , 1987 .

[14]  E. Ferrier,et al.  Long-time concrete-composite interface characterization for reliability prediction of RC beam strengthened with FRP , 2002 .

[15]  A. Si Larbi,et al.  Static behaviour of steel concrete beam connected by bonding , 2007 .

[16]  Jean-Paul Lebet,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of the behaviour of composite bridges during construction , 1998 .

[17]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints-Part II: Comparative study , 2009 .

[18]  Antonio Huerta,et al.  An elastic plastic damage formulation for concrete: Application to elementary tests and comparison with an isotropic damage model , 2006 .