Optimal acquisition schemes for in vivo quantitative magnetization transfer MRI

This paper uses the theory of Cramer‐Rao lower bounds (CRLB) to obtain optimal acquisition schemes for in vivo quantitative magnetization transfer (MT) imaging, although the method is generally applicable to any multiparametric MRI technique. Quantitative MT fits a two‐pool model to data collected at different sampling points or settings of amplitude and offset frequency in the MT saturation pulses. Here we use simple objective functions based on the CRLB to optimize sampling strategies for multiple parameters simultaneously, and use simulated annealing to minimize these objective functions with respect to the sampling configuration. Experiments compare optimal schemes derived for quantitative MT in the human white matter (WM) at 1.5T with previously published schemes using both synthetic and human‐brain data. Results show large reductions in error of the fitted parameters with the new schemes, which greatly increases the clinical potential of in vivo quantitative MT. Since the sampling‐scheme optimization requires specific settings of the MT parameters, we also show that the optimum schemes are robust to these settings within the range of MT parameters observed in the brain. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  B R Rosen,et al.  Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[3]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Relaxivity and magnetization transfer of white matter lipids at MR imaging: importance of cerebrosides and pH. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  W. Näther Optimum experimental designs , 1994 .

[5]  L. Hall,et al.  Optimization of diffusion measurements using Cramer‐Rao lower bound theory and its application to articular cartilage , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Understanding pulsed magnetization transfer , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  R M Harrison,et al.  A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  P Wach,et al.  Imaging of the active B1 field in vivo , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative magnetisation transfer imaging of the human brain , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jonathan A. Jones Optimal Sampling Strategies for the Measurement of Relaxation Times in Proteins , 1997 .

[12]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R I Grossman,et al.  Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  R. Balaban,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[16]  R M Henkelman,et al.  A flexible magnetization transfer line shape derived from tissue experimental data , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  T. A. Carpenter,et al.  Optimised diffusion-weighting for measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in human brain. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  G. Pike,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer in spoiled gradient echo MRI sequences. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[19]  A. Mackay,et al.  In vivo measurement of T2 distributions and water contents in normal human brain , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Laycock,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs , 1995 .

[21]  G J Barker,et al.  Estimation of the macromolecular proton fraction and bound pool T2 in multiple sclerosis. , 2004, Multiple sclerosis.

[22]  A. Crawley,et al.  A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  P. Tofts Quantitative MRI of the Brain , 2003 .

[24]  Vasily L Yarnykh,et al.  Pulsed Z‐spectroscopic imaging of cross‐relaxation parameters in tissues for human MRI: Theory and clinical applications , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Pulsed magnetization transfer contrast in gradient echo imaging: A two‐pool analytic description of signal response , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[27]  G. Barker,et al.  Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  R. Cusack,et al.  New Robust 3-D Phase Unwrapping Algorithms: Application to Magnetic Field Mapping and Undistorting Echoplanar Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  N. Lundbom,et al.  Relaxometry of brain: Why white matter appears bright in MRI , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  I Levesque,et al.  Regional variations in normal brain shown by quantitative magnetization transfer imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Norbert J Pelc,et al.  Cramér–Rao bounds for three‐point decomposition of water and fat , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[34]  R I Grossman,et al.  Quantitative volumetric magnetization transfer analysis in multiple sclerosis: Estimation of macroscopic and microscopic disease burden , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  P A Boulby,et al.  Cross-modality registration: Validation and Application in Magnetisation Transfer Imaging , 2003 .