A Semi‐Structured MODFLOW‐USG Model to Evaluate Local Water Sources to Wells for Decision Support

In order to better represent the configuration of the stream network and simulate local groundwater-surface water interactions, a version of MODFLOW with refined spacing in the topmost layer was applied to a Lake Michigan Basin (LMB) regional groundwater-flow model developed by the U.S. Geological. Regional MODFLOW models commonly use coarse grids over large areas; this coarse spacing precludes model application to local management issues (e.g., surface-water depletion by wells) without recourse to labor-intensive inset models. Implementation of an unstructured formulation within the MODFLOW framework (MODFLOW-USG) allows application of regional models to address local problems. A "semi-structured" approach (uniform lateral spacing within layers, different lateral spacing among layers) was tested using the LMB regional model. The parent 20-layer model with uniform 5000-foot (1524-m) lateral spacing was converted to 4 layers with 500-foot (152-m) spacing in the top glacial (Quaternary) layer, where surface water features are located, overlying coarser resolution layers representing deeper deposits. This semi-structured version of the LMB model reproduces regional flow conditions, whereas the finer resolution in the top layer improves the accuracy of the simulated response of surface water to shallow wells. One application of the semi-structured LMB model is to provide statistical measures of the correlation between modeled inputs and the simulated amount of water that wells derive from local surface water. The relations identified in this paper serve as the basis for metamodels to predict (with uncertainty) surface-water depletion in response to shallow pumping within and potentially beyond the modeled area, see Fienen et al. (2015a).

[1]  Howard W. Reeves,et al.  Regional groundwater-flow model of the Lake Michigan Basin in support of Great Lakes Basin water availability and use studies , 2010 .

[2]  D. Feinstein.  Since “Groundwater and Surface Water–A Single Resource”: some U.S. Geological Survey advances in modeling groundwater/surface-water interactions , 2012 .

[3]  Sorab Panday,et al.  Improving sub-grid scale accuracy of boundary features in regional finite-difference models , 2012 .

[4]  D. Feinstein,et al.  Development and application of a groundwater/surface-water flow model using MODFLOW-NWT for the Upper Fox River Basin, southeastern Wisconsin , 2012 .

[5]  Theis Charles Vernon,et al.  The source of water derived from wells; essential factors, controlling the response of an aquifer to development , 1940 .

[6]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model - documentation of shared node local grid refinement (LGR) and the boundary flow and head (BFH) package , 2006 .

[7]  S. A. Leake,et al.  Streamflow depletion by wells--Understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow , 2012 .

[8]  Michael N. Fienen,et al.  Evaluating the sources of water to wells: Three techniques for metamodeling of a groundwater flow model , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Howard W. Reeves.  Water Availability and Use Pilot-A multiscale assessment in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin , 2011 .

[10]  Michael N Fienen,et al.  Metamodels to Bridge the Gap Between Modeling and Decision Support. , 2015, Ground water.

[11]  Stanley A Leake,et al.  A New Capture Fraction Method to Map How Pumpage Affects Surface Water Flow , 2010, Ground water.

[12]  Marios Sophocleous.  MANAGING WATER RESOURCES SYSTEMS: WHY “SAFE YIELD” IS NOT SUSTAINABLE , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Ground water and surface water a single resource: U , 1998 .

[14]  O. Lehn Franke,et al.  Estimating areas contributing recharge to wells, lessons from previous studies , 1998 .

[15]  Stanley A Leake,et al.  Capture—Rates and Directions of Groundwater Flow Don't Matter! , 2011, Ground water.

[16]  Stanley A Leake,et al.  The Journey from Safe Yield to Sustainability , 2004, Ground water.

[17]  Christian D. Langevin,et al.  MODFLOW–USG version 1: An unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow and tightly coupled processes using a control volume finite-difference formulation , 2013 .

[18]  A. W. Harbaugh,et al.  USGS Directions in MODFLOW Development , 2006, Ground water.

[19]  A. Mayer,et al.  Groundwater Availability as Constrained by Hydrogeology and Environmental Flows , 2014, Ground water.

[20]  S. S. Hughes,et al.  Evaluation of a groundwater corrective action at the Chem-Dyne Hazardous Waste Site using a telescopic mesh refinement modeling approach , 1987 .

[21]  N. Plant,et al.  Bridging groundwater models and decision support with a Bayesian network , 2013 .

[23]  Charles H. Lee.  The Determination of Safe Yield of Underground Reservoirs of the Closed-Basin Type , 2010 .