An interconnected network of UAS as a system-of-systems

Technological advancements and miniaturization have made it possible for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to perform a diverse range of tasks. UAS are being used in various applications ranging from remote sensing[1] to disaster response[2] to package delivery[3]. As drones rapidly fill the airspace, there are several threats that the system can encounter. These threats include mid-air collisions, loss of remote command connection, security breach of the drone's software system and critical damage to the hardware. To ensure the integrity of the drone in flight, an interconnected UAS architecture, having a fully functional system capable of responding to these situations, is required. This paper presents a system meeting these requirements. An interconnected UAS system of systems is proposed that includes systems for onboard GPS, obstacle avoidance central control and safety response. It focuses on the coordination level that the UAS systems will need to have amongst themselves. It proposes a control system to ensure effective monitoring of UAS. The UAS system architecture is comprised of eleven systems that are essential for a safe flight. In addition, the control system includes five different systems that are involved in the decision-making process. The importance and operation of these systems are discussed in detail. The proposed UAS software architecture is capable of performing autonomous self-control. It has decision making modules that can receive data from various sensors and integrate it to provide efficient route planning and data management. The software systems monitor the area surrounding the UAV to facilitate routing and decision making. The software architecture includes self-awareness to respond to situations such as adverse climatic conditions that impact the flight capabilities of the UAS. The proposed UAS system also includes hardware to monitor and update the list of obstacles in its path. This requires the UAS to be equipped with sensors for obstacle determination and a software system that accepts the inputs from these sensors, makes decisions and performs actions, promptly. An emergency response system is included to ensure that the drone will land safely in an appropriate location, if its systems are compromised. This response system is capable of deciding the severity of the situation and sends commands to the flight control system regarding the recovery steps that should be taken. The proposed system architecture incorporates cybersecurity in its design framework so that it is equipped to handle potential hackers that might try to gain access to onboard navigation controls and reroute the UAS for personal gain or another agenda. If the system senses a threat, it launches the emergency response system. The proposed UAS software architecture includes a maintenance and diagnostics system that coordinates and monitors drone activities. It performs functions ranging from monitoring the health of the hardware systems to uploading error reports to the central server. The system transmits error reports to the control unit which further processes the data to determine the source of the error and resolve the issue. In UAS systems, a computerized framework takes input from at least one sensor, and uses a pre-characterized set of guidelines to make decisions [4]. This paper aims to achieve an interconnected UAS system of systems that can address several issues and solutions related to flight autonomously.

[1]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  On unmanned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the National Airspace System , 2008 .

[2]  Reg Austin,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Uavs Design, Development and Deployment , 2010 .

[3]  Zoltan Szantoi,et al.  Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Low-Altitude Aerial Surveys , 2010 .

[4]  G. K. Egan,et al.  MECSE-22-2006 The Use of Infrared Sensors for Absolute Attitude Determination of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2006 .

[5]  YangQuan Chen,et al.  Autopilots for small unmanned aerial vehicles: A survey , 2010 .

[6]  YangQuan Chen,et al.  FRACTIONAL ORDER FLIGHT CONTROL OF A SMALL FIXED-WING UAV: CONTROLLER DESIGN AND SIMULATION STUDY , 2009 .

[7]  Antoine Drouin,et al.  The Paparazzi Solution , 2006 .

[8]  Peter G. Oduor,et al.  Transition Modeling of Land-Use Dynamics in the Pipestem Creek, North Dakota, USA , 2017 .

[9]  Pablo Royo Chic,et al.  UAS architecture for forest fire remote sensing , 2011 .

[10]  Bill Canis Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Commercial Outlook for a New Industry , 2015 .

[11]  I. Mizumoto,et al.  Autopilot System for Kiteplane , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  A Casualty Risk Analysis For Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations Over Inhabited Areas , 2007 .

[13]  Wageeh Boles,et al.  Fixed-Wing Attitude Estimation Using Computer Vision Based Horizon Detection , 2007 .

[14]  Ran Wei,et al.  Locating AED Enabled Medical Drones to Enhance Cardiac Arrest Response Times , 2016, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[15]  Peter G. Oduor,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change detection in Pipestem Creek watershed, North Dakota , 2015 .

[16]  João Batista Camargo,et al.  Guidelines for the Integration of Autonomous UAS into the Global ATM , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[17]  A. Pahsa,et al.  Integrating navigation & surveillance of Unmanned Air Vehicles into the civilian national airspaces by using ADS-B applications , 2011, 2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.

[18]  Liang Tang,et al.  From mission planning to flight control of unmanned aerial vehicles: Strategies and implementation tools , 2005, Annu. Rev. Control..

[19]  Kenzo Nonami,et al.  Autonomous Flying Robots , 2010 .

[20]  Peter G. Oduor,et al.  Quantifying Spatiotemporal Change in Landuse and Land Cover and Accessing Water Quality: A Case Study of Missouri Watershed James Sub-Region, North Dakota , 2016 .

[21]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[22]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[23]  Rodney A. Walker,et al.  Fixed Wing UAV Navigation and Control through Integrated GNSS and Vision , 2005 .

[24]  野波 健蔵,et al.  Autonomous flying robots : unmanned aerial vehicles and micro aerial vehicles , 2010 .

[25]  Brent A. Terwilliger,et al.  The Role of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in Disaster Response and Recovery Efforts: Historical, Current and Future , 2014 .

[26]  Michael F Spigelmire,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems and the Next War , 2013 .

[27]  Pradip M. Jawandhiya,et al.  Review of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) , 2013 .

[28]  L. Wallace,et al.  Snow Depth Retrieval with UAS Using Photogrammetric Techniques , 2015 .