The Effect Of Structure On Convergence Activities Using Group Support Systems

Facilitating group decision and negotiation is a broad topic and has received considerable attention (see chapters by Ackermann and Eden, and Richardson and Andersen, this volume). As research on Group Support Systems (GSS) has evolved over the past decades, a good deal of useful knowledge on group processes, idea generation and decision making has been found (see the chapter by Lewis, this volume).Particular attention has been given to aspects of decision making structure (for example, see chapters by Salo and Hamalainen, Hujala and Kurttila, this volume). See the chapter by Kolfshoten et al., this volume: they consider a number of aspects related to collaboration engineering.However, there are still areas that require in-depth research to remove uncertainties and move computer-mediated group process research forward into the second decade of the 21st century.For example, the ability to converge on the most worthy ideas to translate into knowledge has been generally neglected in this research literature.This is regrettable given its group process importance, especially given the volume of ideas generated by GSS.In this chapter, our focus is on the effects of structure on convergence activities using GSS.Experience shows that convergence dynamics are affected by facilitation (e.g., protocol) as well as specialized technological support (e.g., a “dashboard”).This chapter gives a brief overview of the research and presents an empirical study to illustrate the sort of issues that remain (and the possible solutions) plus directions for future study.

[1]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  In GSS Research How Many Groups per Treatment Condition Are Enough , 1998 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: an experimental study , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[3]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the differences in collaborative system use through appropriation analysis , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  J. McGrath.  Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[5]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[6]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[7]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[8]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[10]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  I. Nonaka.  Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information Creation , 1988 .

[12]  R. Sternberg.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity , 2006 .

[13]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[15]  K. J. Evans,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-solving , 1990 .

[16]  F. T. Eggemeier,et al.  The Effect of Delayed Report on Subjective Ratings of Mental Workload , 1983 .

[17]  Robert B. Allen.  Cognitive Factors in the Use of Menus and Trees: An Experiment , 1983, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[18]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[19]  Gary J. Cook,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Information Search Strategies with Implications for Decision Support System Design , 1993 .

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[21]  H. Gruber,et al.  Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. , 1988 .

[22]  David Coleman,et al.  Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets , 1997 .

[23]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[24]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[26]  Gerald P. Krueger,et al.  Conferencing and Teleconferencing in Three Communication Modes as a Function of the Number of Conferees. , 1980 .

[27]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Entrainment of Creativity in Small Groups , 1993 .

[28]  John I. Kiger,et al.  The Depth/Breadth Trade-Off in the Design of Menu-Driven User Interfaces , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[29]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[30]  Dan Harkey,et al.  The Essential Distributed Objects Survival Guide , 1995 .

[31]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[32]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  Varieties of Divergent Production. , 1984 .

[33]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Hierarchical Menu Design: Breadth, Depth, and Task Complexity , 1996 .

[34]  D. Gopher,et al.  On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures? , 1984 .

[35]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[36]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[37]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[38]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Studies in Interactive Communication: I. The Effects of Four Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Cooperative Problem-Solving , 1972 .

[39]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[40]  R. Adamson,et al.  Functional fixedness as related to elapsed time and to set. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[42]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  Decision Making under Time Pressure , 1997 .

[43]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[44]  T. K. Landauer,et al.  Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width , 1985, CHI '85.

[45]  Mark S. Crabtree,et al.  Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (27th) on the Effect of Delayed Report on Subjective Ratings of Mental Workloads, Held at Norkfolk, VA on 10-14 October 1983. , 1983 .

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[48]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[49]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Mind Myths: exploring popular assumptions about the mind and the brain , 2004 .

[50]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[51]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The Concept Plot: A Concept Mapping Visualization Tool for Asynchronous Web-Based Brainstorming Sessions , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[53]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .