Novel method for the high-throughput processing of slides for the comet assay

Single cell gel electrophoresis (the comet assay), continues to gain popularity as a means of assessing DNA damage. However, the assay's low sample throughput and laborious sample workup procedure are limiting factors to its application. “Scoring”, or individually determining DNA damage levels in 50 cells per treatment, is time-consuming, but with the advent of high-throughput scoring, the limitation is now the ability to process significant numbers of comet slides. We have developed a novel method by which multiple slides may be manipulated, and undergo electrophoresis, in batches of 25 rather than individually and, importantly, retains the use of standard microscope comet slides, which are the assay convention. This decreases assay time by 60%, and benefits from an electrophoresis tank with a substantially smaller footprint, and more uniform orientation of gels during electrophoresis. Our high-throughput variant of the comet assay greatly increases the number of samples analysed, decreases assay time, number of individual slide manipulations, reagent requirements and risk of damage to slides. The compact nature of the electrophoresis tank is of particular benefit to laboratories where bench space is at a premium. This novel approach is a significant advance on the current comet assay procedure.

[1]  Mahsa Karbaschi,et al.  Simplified method for the collection, storage, and comet assay analysis of DNA damage in whole blood. , 2011, Free radical biology & medicine.

[2]  M. Evans,et al.  Combination of azathioprine and UVA irradiation is a major source of cellular 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine. , 2008, DNA repair.

[3]  Detlef Ritter,et al.  Genotoxicity testing in vitro - development of a higher throughput analysis method based on the comet assay. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[4]  David K. Wood,et al.  Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Collins,et al.  Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA. , 1993, Carcinogenesis.

[6]  J. Hornung,et al.  Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  A. Collins,et al.  Detection of alkylation damage in human lymphocyte DNA with the comet assay. , 2001, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[8]  Y. Miyamae,et al.  Detection of DNA lesions induced by chemical mutagens by the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. , 1997 .

[9]  I. Witte,et al.  Automated analysis of DNA damage in the high-throughput version of the comet assay. , 2010, Mutation research.

[10]  David H Phillips,et al.  Inter-laboratory variation in DNA damage using a standard comet assay protocol. , 2012, Mutagenesis.

[11]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[12]  Y. Miyamae,et al.  Detection of DNA lesions induced by chemical mutagens by the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. 1. Relationship between the onset of DNA damage and the characteristics of mutagens. , 1997, Mutation research.

[13]  I. Witte,et al.  Performance of the comet assay in a high-throughput version. , 2009, Mutation research.

[14]  David H Phillips,et al.  Variation of DNA damage levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated in different laboratories. , 2014, Mutagenesis.

[15]  David H Phillips,et al.  An ECVAG inter-laboratory validation study of the comet assay: inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory variations of DNA strand breaks and FPG-sensitive sites in human mononuclear cells. , 2013, Mutagenesis.

[16]  Gunnar Brunborg,et al.  High-throughput comet assay using 96 minigels. , 2013, Mutagenesis.

[17]  A. Collins,et al.  Single cell gel electrophoresis: Detection of DNA damage at different levels of sensitivity , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[18]  K J Johanson,et al.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. , 1984, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[19]  D. Mitchell,et al.  UV‐sensitive rodent mutant cell lines of complementation groups 6 and 8 differ phenotypically from their human counterparts , 1997, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[20]  I. Witte,et al.  The ability of the high-throughput comet assay to measure the sensitivity of five cell lines toward methyl methanesulfonate, hydrogen peroxide, and pentachlorophenol. , 2010, Mutation research.