ADVANTAGES OF TRABECULAR METAL IN REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Total hip arthroplasty is a surgical procedure that adresses to people with severe hip disorder. The number of total hip replacements is growing year by year due to the good functional results obtained after this procedure, which include pain relief, improvement of walking and quality of life. With improvements in the techniques, materials and prostheses, hip arthroplasties are performed in the younger age patients, which leads to the demand for revision procedures. This procedure almost always comes across with acetabular bone defect. The main challenge for the surgeon during the revision hip arthroplasty is to achieve good implant stability. The purpose of this study is to assess the early clinical and radiological results after revision acetabular components using trabecular metal shells and augments. It was performed on 26 patients classified as Paprosky IIC and IIIA. The functional evaluation was performed perioperatively, at three and at six months after the surgery using radiographic evaluation and Harris Hip Score. No evidence of cup migration or periacetabular osteolysis was noted. With low rate of complications and with overall good level of satisfaction, we assume that modular TM acetabular components may provide good long-term solutions for reconstruction of acetabulum in revision hip arthroplasty.

[1]  M. Varacallo,et al.  Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis , 2019 .

[2]  R. Rossi,et al.  Treatment of Bone Losses in Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Trabecular Metal , 2016 .

[3]  V. Callado,et al.  Evaluation of the fixation of the trabecular metal wedge in patients undergoing revision of total hip arthroplasty☆☆☆ , 2014, Revista brasileira de ortopedia.

[4]  R. Malhotra,et al.  Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty , 2012, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[5]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Orthopaedics in 2020: predictors of musculoskeletal need. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Kevin Ong,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  S. Sporer,et al.  The Treatment of Acetabular Bone Defects with an Associated Pelvic Discontinuity , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Stiehl Trabecular metal in hip reconstructive surgery. , 2005, Orthopedics.

[9]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[10]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Modular Porous Metal Augments for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss during Revision Hip Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Thomas D. Brown,et al.  INTERFACIAL FRICTIONAL BEHAVIOR: CANCELLOUS BONE, CORTICAL BONE, AND A NOVEL POROUS TANTALUM BIOMATERIAL , 1999 .

[12]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old. A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.