Exploring differences in how men and women respond to threats to positive face on social media

A three-condition (rejection, criticism, control) experiment (N=78) with gender treated as an additional factor and moderating variable examined gender differences in response to two types of threats to positive face - rejection and criticism - on a social-networking site. Results showed it did not matter if men or women were rejected or criticized on a social-networking site; both threats to positive face lead to more retaliatory aggression, compared to the control. However, men retaliated to a greater extent than women to both types of threats. Also, men responded differently to criticism than to rejection, while women's results did not vary. Findings are discussed in relation to face theory and politeness theory, particularly in regard to computer-mediated communication.

[1]  S. Herring.  Gender differences in CMC: findings and implications , 2000 .

[2]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups , 2006 .

[3]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Smile and the world will smile with you - The effects of a virtual agent's smile on users' evaluation and behavior , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  S. Herring,et al.  Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force , 2010 .

[5]  Jung-ran Park.  Interpersonal and Affective Communication in Synchronous Online Discourse1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[6]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Mind your Ps and Qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities , 2008, CSCW.

[8]  Carlos G. Aleman,et al.  Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Revised Analysis of Face-Threatening Acts and Application to Seeking Compliance with Same-Sex Friends. , 1998 .

[9]  Geraldine Downey,et al.  Rejection Sensitivity and the Defensive Motivational System: Insights From the Startle Response to Rejection Cues , 2004, Psychological science.

[10]  S. Ruhi,et al.  Conceptualizing face and relational work in (im)politeness : Revelations from politeness lexemes and idioms in Turkish , 2007 .

[11]  C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. , 2002 .

[12]  Victoria J. Rideout,et al.  Sexual Socialization Messages on Entertainment Television: Comparing Content Trends 1997–2002 , 2007 .

[13]  C. Anderson,et al.  Violent Video Games and Aggressive Behavior in Young Women. , 2003 .

[14]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  M. Lauzen,et al.  Constructing Gender Stereotypes Through Social Roles in Prime-Time Television , 2008 .

[16]  U. Hess,et al.  You smile–I smile: Emotion expression in social interaction , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[17]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Shao-Kang Lo,et al.  The Nonverbal Communication Functions of Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  A Bandura,et al.  Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. , 1999, Psychological review.

[20]  A. Graesser.  Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[21]  Erna Alant,et al.  Which Graphic Symbols do 4-Year-Old Children Choose to Represent Each of the Four Basic Emotions? , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[22]  Gina Masullo Chen.  Losing Face on Social Media , 2015, Commun. Res..

[23]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[24]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[25]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The Measurement of Attitudes. , 1950 .

[26]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Same Same But Different!? The Differential Influence of Smilies and Emoticons on Person Perception , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[28]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[29]  M. Eastin.  Video Game Violence and the Female Game Player: Self‐ and Opponent Gender Effects on Presence and Aggressive Thoughts , 2006 .

[30]  Kirk W. Duthler.  The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  Kay Bussey,et al.  Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning , 2004 .

[32]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[33]  Valerie Manusov,et al.  Managing Face Concerns in Criticism Integrating Nonverbal Behaviors as a Dimension of Politeness in Female Friendship Dyads , 1998 .

[34]  A. Fischer.  Face-To-Face Communication over the Internet: Gendered social interactions in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 2011 .

[35]  Kimberly M. Christopherson.  The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog" , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  J. Wolak,et al.  Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[37]  M. Leary,et al.  The sociometer, self-esteem, and the regulation of interpersonal behavior. , 2004 .

[38]  P. Ekman,et al.  Felt, false, and miserable smiles , 1982 .

[39]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analytic Review of 192 Studies on Social Exclusion , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[40]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Politeness Theory and Relational Work , 2005 .

[41]  Andrew S. Rancer,et al.  Argumentative and Aggressive Communication: Theory, Research, and Application , 2006 .

[42]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[43]  Li Jing-jie.  Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Thoughts,Feelings,and Behavior , 2008 .

[44]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  Looking for Gender: Gender Roles and Behaviors Among Online Gamers , 2009 .

[45]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Sticks and Stones: Language, Face, and Online Dispute Resolution , 2007 .

[46]  Daantje Derks,et al.  The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The Measurement Of Attitude , 1929 .

[48]  Jennifer Gibbs,et al.  Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  D. Keltner,et al.  The Gender Stereotyping of Emotions , 2000 .

[50]  Michael A. Shapiro,et al.  Media Dependency and Perceived Reality of Fiction and News , 2004 .

[51]  Ming-chung Yu.  On the universality of face: evidence from chinese compliment response behavior , 2003 .

[52]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[53]  Yoojung Kim,et al.  Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. , 1985 .

[56]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[57]  Christina Gloeckner.  Interaction Ritual Essays In Face To Face Behavior , 2016 .

[58]  D. Hay,et al.  Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  Xiaohui Pan,et al.  Face and facework in conflict: a cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States , 2001 .

[60]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Economic Activity in a Virtual World , 2010, ICWSM.

[61]  L. Tennakoon,et al.  Challenges in recruitment of research participants , 2003 .

[62]  J. Spence,et al.  Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes: What Do They Signify? , 2000 .

[63]  Stephanie Schnurr,et al.  Politeness, Humor and Gender in the Workplace: Negotiating Norms and Identifying Contestation , 2005 .

[64]  鈴木 聡.  Media Equation 研究の背景と動向 , 2011 .

[65]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  Annie Lang,et al.  Think-Aloud and Thought-List Procedures in Investigating Mental Processes , 2014 .

[67]  Dirk Remley,et al.  Conventional Faces: Emoticons in Instant Messaging Discourse , 2011 .