Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Enhancement characteristics after administration of a contrast agent are regarded as a major criterion for differential diagnosis in magnetic resonance mammography (MRM). However, no consensus exists about the best measurement method to assess contrast enhancement kinetics. This systematic investigation was performed to compare visual estimation with manual region of interest (ROI) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) analysis for time curve measurements in MRM. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 329 patients undergoing surgery after MRM (1.5 T) were analyzed prospectively. Dynamic data were measured using visual estimation, including ROI as well as CAD methods, and classified depending on initial signal increase and delayed enhancement. RESULTS Pathology revealed 469 lesions (279 malignant, 190 benign). Kappa agreement between the methods ranged from 0.78 to 0.81. Diagnostic accuracies of 74.4% (visual), 75.7% (ROI), and 76.6% (CAD) were found without statistical significant differences. CONCLUSIONS According to our results, curve type measurements are useful as a diagnostic criterion in breast lesions irrespective of the method used.

[1]  Mariko Goto,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast‐enhanced MR imaging: Comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  C. Kuhl.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Corine Vincent,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability and extracellular volume fraction of breast tumors by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced relaxometry. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Scott F. Thompson,et al.  Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[10]  D Hahn,et al.  Understanding Why Contrast Enhancement in Dynamic MRI Is Not Reproducible: Illustration with a Simple Phantom , 2001, The breast journal.

[11]  E. Hauth,et al.  Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. , 2006, Clinical imaging.

[12]  A Horsman,et al.  Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study. , 2006, Radiology.

[14]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Fritz Schick,et al.  MR imaging-detected breast lesions: histopathologic correlation of lesion characteristics and signal intensity data. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. , 2007, Radiology.

[17]  Hans H Schild,et al.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2005, Radiology.

[18]  Rolf Vosshenrich,et al.  Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma , 1993 .

[19]  A Horsman,et al.  Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  W. A. Kaiser,et al.  Is the “blooming sign” a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? , 2004, European Radiology.

[21]  C. Boetes,et al.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging , 2008, European Radiology.

[22]  Joachim Boettcher,et al.  Further Signs in the Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Mammography: A Retrospective Study , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Color-Coded Automated Signal Intensity Curves for Detection and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Preliminary Evaluation of a New Software Package for Integrated Magnetic Resonance-Based Breast Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[24]  G P Liney,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. , 2004, Breast.

[25]  M. Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using Gd‐DTPA: Interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast , 2002, European Radiology.

[27]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[28]  G. Brix,et al.  Methods for quantitative assessment of tissue microcirculation using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging , 1997, Der Radiologe.

[29]  P J Drew,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. , 1997, Clinical radiology.