Average Rician K-Factor Based Analytical Uncertainty Model for Total Radiated Power Measurement in a Reverberation Chamber

Total radiated power (TRP) is commonly accepted as an important figure of merit (FoM) for evaluating the over-the-air (OTA) performance of wireless devices enabled by the emerging fifth generation (5G) mobile communication technology. The statistically homogeneous and isotropic electromagnetic (EM) environment created by a reverberation chamber (RC) makes it an accurate, efficient, and economic testing facility for TRP measurement. In this paper, an improved analytical uncertainty model which is based on the average Rician <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-factor (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K_{avg}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) and the number of independent samples is proposed for TRP measurement using an RC. It has the flexibility to allow different stirring configurations in the calibration stage and the measurement stage, and gives insight into the measurement uncertainty without the tedious and inefficient empirical estimation processes. Estimators of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K_{avg}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> are modelled and analyzed. Specifically, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K_{avg}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is validated by the Monte Carlo simulation, and its unbiased correction is derived accordingly for improved uncertainty model accuracy. Extensive 9-Point estimation measurements are also conducted in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed analytical model.

[1]  S. Perna,et al.  K-Factor Estimate: Statistical Behavior of Its Distribution for Large Sample Sizes , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  Xiaoming Chen,et al.  Statistical analysis of measurement uncertainty in total radiated power of wireless devices in reverberation chamber , 2020, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation.

[3]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  A Significance Test for Reverberation-Chamber Measurement Uncertainty in Total Radiated Power of Wireless Devices , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Barry N. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Nist Measurement Results , 2017 .

[5]  K. Remley,et al.  Correlation-Based Uncertainty in Loaded Reverberation Chambers , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  Xiaoming Chen Measurement uncertainty of RC and its reduction techniques for OTA tests: a review , 2019 .

[7]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  Estimating and Reducing Uncertainty in Reverberation-Chamber Characterization at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  K. Remley,et al.  Estimating and Correcting the Device-Under-Test Transfer Function in Loaded Reverberation Chambers for Over-the-Air Tests , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[10]  Maurizio Migliaccio,et al.  On the Estimated Measurement Uncertainty of the Insertion Loss in a Reverberation Chamber Including Frequency Stirring , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  L. R. Arnaut,et al.  Measurement uncertainty for reverberation chambers - I. Sample statistics. , 2008 .

[12]  V. M. Primiani,et al.  Base-Case Model for Measurement Uncertainty in a Reverberation Chamber Including Frequency Stirring , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  J. Carlsson,et al.  Investigation of the distribution of the random LOS component in a reverberation chamber , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[14]  D. Hill,et al.  On the Use of Reverberation Chambers to Simulate a Rician Radio Environment for the Testing of Wireless Devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Five disruptive technology directions for 5G , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  P. Besnier,et al.  On the $K$ -Factor Estimation for Rician Channel Simulated in Reverberation Chamber , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[17]  P. Kildal,et al.  Characterization of Reverberation Chambers for OTA Measurements of Wireless Devices: Physical Formulations of Channel Matrix and New Uncertainty Formula , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[18]  D. Hill Electronic mode stirring for reverberation chambers , 1994 .

[19]  David A. Hill,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields in Cavities , 2009 .

[20]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Evaluation in a Low Rician K-Factor Reverberation-Chamber Environment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[21]  Guang Yang,et al.  5G Over-the-Air Measurement Challenges: Overview , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[23]  Yi Huang,et al.  Anechoic and Reverberation Chambers , 2018 .

[24]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  Measurement Challenges for 5G and Beyond: An Update from the National Institute of Standards and Technology , 2017, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[25]  K. A. Remley,et al.  Reverberation Chamber Measurement Correlation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[26]  Qian Xu,et al.  Two Alternative Methods to Measure the Radiated Emission in a Reverberation Chamber , 2016 .

[27]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  Uncertainty From Choice of Mode-Stirring Technique in Reverberation-Chamber Measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[28]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[29]  Kate A. Remley,et al.  Configuring and Verifying Reverberation Chambers for Testing Cellular Wireless Devices , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[30]  Zhihua Zhang,et al.  Reverberation Chambers for Over-the-Air Tests: An Overview of Two Decades of Research , 2018, IEEE Access.