Multivariate Frequency Domain Analysis of Causal Interactions in Physiological Time Series

A common way of obtaining information about a physiological system is to measure one or more signals from the system, consider their temporal evolution in the form of numerical time series, and obtain quantitative indexes through the application of time series analysis techniques. While historical approaches to time series analysis were addressed to the study of single signals, recent advances have made it possible to study collectively the behavior of several signals measured simultaneously from the considered system. In fact, multivariate (MV) time series analysis is nowadays extensively used to characterize interdependencies among multiple signals collected from dynamical physiological systems. Applications of this approach are ubiquitous, for instance, in neurophysiology and cardiovascular physiology (see, e.g., (Pereda et al., 2005) and (Porta et al., 2009) and references therein). In neurophysiology, the time series to be analyzed are obtained, for example, sampling electroencephalographic (EEG) or magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals which measure the temporal dynamics of the electro-magnetic fields of the brain as reflected at different locations of the scalp. In cardiovascular physiology, the time series are commonly constructed measuring at each cardiac beat cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory variables such as the heart period, the systolic/diastolic arterial pressure, and the respiratory flow. It is well recognized that the application of MV analysis to these physiological time series may provide unique information about the coupling mechanisms underlying brain dynamics and cardiovascular control, and may also lead to the definition of quantitative indexes useful in medical settings to assess the degree of mechanism impairment in pathological conditions. MV time series analysis is not only important to detect coupling, i.e., the presence or absence of interactions, between the considered time series, but also to identify driver-response relationships between them. This problem is a special case of the general question of assessing causality, or cause-effect relations, between (sub)systems, processes or phenomena. The assessment of coupling and causality in MV processes is often performed by linear time series analysis approaches, i.e. approaches in which a linear model is supposed to underlie the generation of temporal dynamics and interactions of the considered signals (Kay, 1988; Gourevitch et al., 2006). While non-linear methods are continuously under development

[1]  Alois Schlögl,et al.  A comparison of multivariate autoregressive estimators , 2006, Signal Process..

[2]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high‐resolution EEG recordings , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Luca Faes,et al.  Testing Frequency-Domain Causality in Multivariate Time Series , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès,et al.  Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Luca Faes,et al.  An identifiable model to assess frequency-domain granger causality in the presence of significant instantaneous interactions , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[8]  Luca Faes,et al.  Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  L Faes,et al.  Assessing frequency domain causality in cardiovascular time series with instantaneous interactions. , 2010, Methods of information in medicine.

[10]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Is partial coherence a viable technique for identifying generators of neural oscillations? , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  T. Collura Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1996 .

[12]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Comments on ‘Is Partial Coherence a Viable Technique for Identifying Generators of Neural Oscillations?’ , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[14]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods xxx (2005) xxx–xxx Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence , 2005 .

[16]  Alois Schlögl,et al.  Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[17]  Luca Faes,et al.  Robust estimation of Partial Directed Coherence by the vector optimal parameter search algorithm , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[18]  Michael Eichler,et al.  On the Evaluation of Information Flow in Multivariate Systems by the Directed Transfer Function , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  Multimodal signal processing for the analysis of cardiovascular variability , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[21]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .

[22]  L. Faes,et al.  Assessment of Granger Causality by Nonlinear Model Identification: Application to Short-term Cardiovascular Variability , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[24]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[25]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Luca Faes,et al.  Extended causal modeling to assess Partial Directed Coherence in multiple time series with significant instantaneous interactions , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  L.A. Baccald,et al.  Generalized Partial Directed Coherence , 2007, 2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[28]  Raffaello Furlan,et al.  Quantifying the strength of the linear causal coupling in closed loop interacting cardiovascular variability signals , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[30]  Helmut Lütkepohl,et al.  Introduction to multiple time series analysis , 1991 .

[31]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[32]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects: an identifiable model based on non-Gaussianity , 2008, ICML '08.

[34]  R. Cohen,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. , 1981, Science.

[35]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Studying the Interaction Between Brain Structures via Directed Coherence and Granger Causality , 1998 .

[36]  Anthony L Bertapelle Spectral Analysis of Time Series. , 1979 .