Assessing the use of multiseason QuickBird imagery for mapping invasive species in a Lake Erie coastal Marsh

QuickBird multispectral satellite images taken in September 2002 (peak biomass) and April 2003 (pre-growing season) were used to map emergent wetland vegetation communities, particularly invasive Phragmites australis and Typha spp., within a diked wetland at the western end of Lake Erie. An unsupervised classification was performed on a nine-layer image stack consisting of all four spectral bands from both dates plus a September Normalized Difference Vegetation Index image. The resulting eight cover classes distinguished three monodominant genera (Phragmites australis, Typha spp., Nelumbo lutea), three multigenera plant communities (wet meadow, other non persistent emergents, woody vegetation), and two unvegetated cover types (water, bare soil). Field validation at 196 data points yielded an overall classification accuracy of 62%, with producer’s accuracy for the eight individual classes ranging from 41 to 91% and user’s accuracy from 17 to 90%. Three-fourths of areas designated as Phragmites were correctly mapped, but 14% were found to be cattail (Typha) during field validation. Lotus (Nelumbo lutea) beds were accurately mapped on multiseason imagery (producer’s accuracy = 91%); these beds had not yet emerged above water in April, but were fully developed in September. Other types of non persistent vegetation were confused with managed areas in which vegetation had been cut and burned to control invasive Phragmites. Multiseason QuickBird imagery is promising for distinguishing certain wetland plant species, but should be used with caution in highly managed areas where vegetation changes may reflect human alterations rather than phenological change.

[1]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[2]  R. M. Hoffer,et al.  Spectral characteristics of wetland habitats , 1981 .

[3]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[4]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  An evaluation of the CoastWatch change detection protocol in South Carolina , 1993 .

[5]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Measurement of seasonal and yearly cattail and waterlily changes using multidate SPOT panchromatic data , 1993 .

[6]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[7]  K. Rutchey,et al.  Air Photointerpretation and Satellite Imagery Analysis Techniques for Mapping Cattail Coverage in a , 1999 .

[8]  Charles M. Bachmann,et al.  Automatic classification of land cover on Smith Island, VA, using HyMAP imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Jinfei Wang,et al.  Monitoring the change of Phragmites distribution using satellite data , 2003 .

[10]  Nathan J. Heinert,et al.  Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery , 2003 .

[11]  S. Petrie,et al.  Historical Distribution and Abundance of Phragmites australis at Long Point, Lake Erie, Ontario , 2003 .

[12]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland , 2003 .

[13]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[14]  Accuracy Assessments of Airborne Hyperspectral Data for Mapping Opportunistic Plant Species in Freshwater Coastal Wetlands , 2004 .

[15]  D. Uzarski,et al.  Invertebrate habitat use in relation to fetch and plant zonation in northern Lake Huron coastal wetlands , 2004 .

[16]  M. Madden,et al.  Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Operations for Vegetation Mapping of Invasive Exotics1 , 2004 .

[17]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Mapping submergent aquatic vegetation in the US Great Lakes using Quickbird satellite data , 2005 .

[18]  Mathieu Maheu-Giroux,et al.  Landscape ecology of Phragmites australis invasion in networks of linear wetlands , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Martha S. Gilmore,et al.  TIDAL WETLAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LANDSAT IMAGERY USING AN INTEGRATED PIXEL-BASED AND OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION APPROACH , 2006 .

[20]  C. Johnston,et al.  Plant Species Indicators of Physical Environment in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands , 2007 .

[21]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Evaluation of geographic, geomorphic and human influences on Great Lakes wetland indicators: A multi-assemblage approach , 2007 .

[22]  Bruce W. Pengra,et al.  Mapping an invasive plant, Phragmites australis, in coastal wetlands using the EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral sensor , 2007 .

[23]  C. Johnston,et al.  Rapid Invasion of a Great Lakes Coastal Wetland by Non-native Phragmites australis and Typha , 2007 .

[24]  C. Johnston,et al.  Sixty-three Years of Land Alteration in Erie Township , 2007 .

[25]  Ross S. Lunetta,et al.  Remote Sensing and GIS Accuracy Assessment , 2007 .

[26]  Francisco J. Artigas,et al.  Spectral discrimination of marsh vegetation types in the New Jersey Meadowlands, USA , 2006, Wetlands.

[27]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models , 2006, Wetlands.

[28]  Ofer Beeri,et al.  Remote wetland assessment for Missouri Coteau prairie glacial basins , 2005, Wetlands.

[29]  S. Ustin,et al.  Spectral reflectance characteristics of California subalpine marsh plant communities , 1998, Wetlands.

[30]  C. Johnston,et al.  Comparison of the Wisconsin and National Wetlands Inventories , 2002, Wetlands.