Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model , 2012, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  B. Ebersberger,et al.  Industrial Innovation Collaboration in a Capital Region Context , 2011 .

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Publish or Patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Diansheng Guo,et al.  Local entropy map: a nonparametric approach to detecting spatially varying multivariate relationships , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The triple helix perspective of innovation systems , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  M. I. Vargas.  Government Influence and Foreign Direct Investment: Organizational Learning in an Electronics Cluster , 2010 .

[7]  A. Isaksen,et al.  Regions, networks and innovative performance: The case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway , 2010 .

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Redundancy in Systems which Entertain a Model of Themselves: Interaction Information and the Self-organization of Anticipation , 2010, Entropy.

[9]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[10]  M. Ho.  How Regional Innovation Systems Play a Relative Competitive Role Within Knowledge Networks , 2009 .

[11]  A. Isaksen.  Innovation Dynamics of Global Competitive Regional Clusters: The Case of the Norwegian Centres of Expertise , 2009 .

[12]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Exploring the Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening Scania's Regional Innovation System: Towards Institutional Learning? , 2009 .

[13]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Information of interactions in complex systems , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[14]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[15]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Ross Ashby's information theory: a bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[16]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity , 2008 .

[17]  Raymond W. Yeung,et al.  Information Theory and Network Coding , 2008 .

[18]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Medium-tech industries may be of greater importance to a local economy than 'High-tech' firms: new methods for measuring the knowledge base of an economic system. , 2008, Medical hypotheses.

[19]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Innovator networks and regional knowledge base , 2008 .

[20]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada , 2008 .

[21]  Aidong Zhang,et al.  Information-theoretic metrics for visualizing gene-environment interactions. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  J. Henderson,et al.  Understanding knowledge spillovers , 2007 .

[23]  Arne Isaksen,et al.  Technology Cities in Norway: Innovating in Glocal Networks , 2007 .

[24]  A. Isaksen.  Clusters, innovation and the local learning paradox , 2007 .

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems, Research Policy (forthcoming) , 2006, 0911.3407.

[26]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy (forthcoming). , 2006, 0911.3412.

[27]  Maria Isabel Rivera.  THE FOREIGN FACTOR WITHIN THE TRIPLE HELIX MODEL: INTERACTIONS OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS,TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGION: THE CASE OF THE ELECTRONICS CLUSTER IN GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MÉXICO. , 2006 .

[28]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[29]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. , 2005 .

[30]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[31]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[32]  G. Panne.  Entrepreneurship and localized knowledge spillovers: evidence from 398 innovators , 2004 .

[33]  Jan G. Lambooy,et al.  The transmission of knowledge, emerging networks, and the role of universities: An evolutionary approach , 2004 .

[34]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' , 2004, 0911.3414.

[35]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[36]  Ivan Bratko,et al.  Quantifying and Visualizing Attribute Interactions: An Approach Based on Entropy , 2003 .

[37]  James Simmie,et al.  Innovation and Urban Regions as National and International Nodes for the Transfer and Sharing of Knowledge , 2003 .

[38]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  The Odd Role of Proximity in Knowledge Relations - High-Tech in the Netherlands , 2002 .

[39]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[40]  Heidi Wiig Aslesen,et al.  Oslo: In What Way an Innovative City? , 2001 .

[41]  Richard C Lewontin,et al.  The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment , 2000 .

[42]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[43]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[44]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[45]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[46]  B. Asheim,et al.  Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? , 1997 .

[47]  J. O. Dolva,et al.  Organizing innovation: Integrating knowledge systems , 1997 .

[48]  Björn Asheim,et al.  Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’. A condition for prosperity? , 1996 .

[49]  T. Tsujishita,et al.  On Triple Mutual Information , 1994 .

[50]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure , 1993 .

[51]  Te Sun Han,et al.  Multiple Mutual Informations and Multiple Interactions in Frequency Data , 1980, Inf. Control..

[52]  D. H. Freeman.  Statistical Decomposition Analysis , 1974 .

[53]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[54]  D. Pugh,et al.  The Context of Organization Structures , 1969 .

[55]  D. Pugh.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations. , 1969 .

[56]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The relation between information and variance analyses , 1956 .

[57]  W. J. McGill.  Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[58]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[59]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[60]  A. J. Bell.  THE CO-INFORMATION LATTICE , 2003 .

[61]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[62]  Norman Abramson,et al.  Information theory and coding , 1963 .