Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
Anne M. Sinatra | Kimberly A. Pollard | Benjamin T. Files | Ashley H. Oiknine | Mark Ericson | Peter Khooshabeh | M. Ericson | A. Sinatra | P. Khooshabeh
[1] A. L. Baylor,et al. The Effects of Pedagogical Agent Voice and Animation on Learning, Motivation and Perceived Persona , 2003 .
[2] Anthony G. Picciano. BEYOND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS: ISSUES OF INTERACTION, PRESENCE, AND PERFORMANCE IN AN ONLINE COURSE , 2019, Online Learning.
[3] Shawn A. Weil,et al. From Gaming to Training: A Review of Studies on Fidelity, Immersion, Presence, and Buy-in and Their Effects on Transfer in PC-Based Simulations and Games , 2005 .
[4] Scotty D. Craig,et al. Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .
[5] R. Mayer. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Principles Based on Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Personalization, Voice, Image, and Embodiment Principles , 2014 .
[6] James C. Lester,et al. Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction , 2000 .
[7] D. Garrison. ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES , 2019, Online Learning.
[8] Jennifer C. Richardson,et al. EXAMINING SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS' PERCEIVED LEARNING AND SATISFACTION , 2003, Online Learning.
[9] John J. Foxe,et al. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.
[10] Benjamin Kehrwald,et al. Understanding social presence in text‐based online learning environments , 2008 .
[11] Shannon K. T. Bailey,et al. The Impact of Synthetic and Accented Speech on Unattended Recall in a Dichotic Listening Task , 2012 .
[12] Parham Mokhtari,et al. On the human ability to auditorily perceive human speaker's facing angle , 2010, 2010 4th International Universal Communication Symposium.
[13] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Animated Pedagogical Agents as Aids in Multimedia Learning: Effects on Eye-Fixations During Learning and Learning Outcomes , 2017 .
[14] Heiga Zen,et al. The HTS-2008 System: Yet Another Evaluation of the Speaker-Adaptive HMM-based Speech Synthesis System in The 2008 Blizzard Challenge , 2008 .
[15] Steve Nebel,et al. Introducing the familiarity mechanism: A unified explanatory approach for the personalization effect and the examination of youth slang in multimedia learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[16] Raphael Meyer von Wolff,et al. Say Hello to Your New Automated Tutor - A Structured Literature Review on Pedagogical Conversational Agents , 2019, Wirtschaftsinformatik.
[17] Emiel Krahmer,et al. The Effects of Feedback on Children's Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Second Language Learning , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
[18] R. Mayer,et al. Getting the point: Which kinds of gestures by pedagogical agents improve multimedia learning? , 2019, Journal of Educational Psychology.
[19] Jason D. Moss,et al. The mediating role of presence differs across types of spatial learning in immersive technologies , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[20] Flemming Konradsen,et al. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.
[21] Ausdang Thangthai,et al. Synthesising visual speech using dynamic visemes and deep learning architectures , 2019, Comput. Speech Lang..
[22] Stefan Kopp,et al. Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[23] Kyle Johnsen,et al. Experiences in using immersive virtual characters to educate medical communication skills , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..
[24] James C. Lester,et al. The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .
[25] Jeeheon Ryu,et al. The effects of social and cognitive cues on learning comprehension, eye-gaze pattern, and cognitive load in video instruction , 2020, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.
[26] Yu-Yun Chang,et al. Evaluation of TTS Systems in Intelligibility and Comprehension Tasks , 2011, ROCLING/IJCLCLP.
[27] S A Duffy,et al. Comprehension of Synthetic Speech Produced by Rule: A Review and Theoretical Interpretation , 1992, Language and speech.
[28] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .
[29] Annika Silvervarg,et al. Instructing a Teachable Agent with Low or High Self-Efficacy – Does Similarity Attract? , 2019, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[30] M A Crary,et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the study of vocal tract configuration. , 1996, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.
[31] L. Bernstein,et al. Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[32] Catherine J. Stevens,et al. On-line experimental methods to evaluate text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis: effects of voice gender and signal quality on intelligibility, naturalness and preference , 2005, Comput. Speech Lang..
[33] Deborah Richards,et al. Supporting and challenging learners through pedagogical agents: Addressing ethical issues through designing for values , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[34] R. Mayer,et al. Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice ☆ , 2005 .
[35] Tze Wei Liew,et al. The Effects of Peer-Like and Expert-Like Pedagogical Agents on Learners' Agent Perceptions, Task-Related Attitudes, and Learning Achievement , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[36] Lynne E. Bernstein,et al. Visual speech discrimination and identification of natural and synthetic consonant stimuli , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[37] Marian L. Houser,et al. The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship , 2000 .
[38] P. Arnold,et al. Bisensory augmentation: a speechreading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact. , 2001, British journal of psychology.
[39] Ginevra Castellano,et al. Empathic Robot for Group Learning , 2019, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.
[40] Christine L. Lisetti,et al. 10 advantages of using avatars in patient-centered computer-based interventions for behavior change , 2012, SIGH.
[41] Paul Brna,et al. Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? , 2000, Education and Information Technologies.
[42] D. Kort,et al. Digital Games as Social Presence Technology: Development of the Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ) , 2007 .
[43] Maik Beege,et al. Boundary conditions of the politeness effect in online mathematical learning , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[44] Guan-Yu Lin,et al. Social Presence Questionnaire of Online Collaborative Learning: Development and Validity , 2005 .
[45] Tze Wei Liew,et al. Does speaker’s voice enthusiasm affect social cue, cognitive load and transfer in multimedia learning? , 2020, Information and Learning Sciences.
[46] Stefan Kopp,et al. The Effect of a Robot’s Gestures and Adaptive Tutoring on Children’s Acquisition of Second Language Vocabularies , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[47] P. Arnold,et al. Bisensory augmentation of complex spoken passages , 2001, British journal of audiology.
[48] Yanghee Kim,et al. Research-Based Design of Pedagogical Agent Roles: a Review, Progress, and Recommendations , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[49] James A. Landay,et al. QuizBot: A Dialogue-based Adaptive Learning System for Factual Knowledge , 2019, CHI.
[50] Baptiste Jacquet,et al. Learning by Teaching with Humanoid Robot: A New Powerful Experimental Tool to Improve Children's Learning Ability , 2018, J. Robotics.
[51] R. Mayer,et al. Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .
[52] Nicholas H. Müller,et al. Cognitive Load Levels While Learning with or Without a Pedagogical Agent , 2019, HCI.
[53] Roxana Moreno,et al. The Roles of Animated Pedagogical Agents' Presence and Nonverbal Communication in Multimedia Learning Environments , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..
[54] Patricia D. Mautone,et al. Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. , 2003 .
[55] Nor Azan Mat Zin,et al. Exploring the affective, motivational and cognitive effects of pedagogical agent enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment , 2017, Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences.
[56] Frank E. Ritter,et al. Enhanced Behavioral Realism for Live Fire Targets , 2014 .
[57] Robert O. Davis. The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis , 2018, Educational Research Review.
[58] Noah L. Schroeder,et al. How Effective are Pedagogical Agents for Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review , 2013 .
[59] J. Gratch,et al. Who Is there? Can a Virtual Agent Really Elicit Social Presence? , 2009 .
[60] Mohd Hishamuddin Abdul Rahman,et al. Sense of Presence and Learning Satisfaction among Students of Different Age Groups in a 3-D Virtual World , 2019, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology.
[61] Noah L. Schroeder,et al. Reconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human , 2017, Comput. Educ..
[62] Adriana Tapus,et al. User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy , 2008, Intell. Serv. Robotics.
[63] James C. Lester,et al. The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.
[64] Robert O. Davis,et al. Sometimes more is better: Agent gestures, procedural knowledge and the foreign language learner , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[65] Wendy Ju,et al. Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[66] C. Nass,et al. Social-Psychological Origins of Feelings of Presence: Creating Social Presence With Machine-Generated Voices , 2005 .
[67] S. Trauzettel-Klosinski,et al. Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[68] G. Bente,et al. Personalizing e-Learning. The Social Effects of Pedagogical Agents , 2010 .
[69] David Wood,et al. The effect of task conditions on the comprehensibility of synthetic speech , 2000, CHI.
[70] Jerald Thomas,et al. Level of immersion affects spatial learning in virtual environments: results of a three-condition within-subjects study with long intersession intervals , 2020, Virtual Reality.
[71] Soo Youn Oh,et al. Effect of Behavioral Realism on Social Interactions Inside Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2018, PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality.
[72] Carrie Heeter,et al. Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.
[73] J. Bailenson,et al. Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .
[74] Joris B. Janssen,et al. Using a robot to personalise health education for children with diabetes type 1: a pilot study. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.
[75] Zehui Zhan,et al. Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students' learning achievement and satisfaction across environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[76] Hartmut Traunmüller,et al. Perception of vocal effort and distance from the speaker on the basis of vowel utterances , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[77] A. Macleod,et al. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.
[78] Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence , 2016 .
[79] Neil Charness,et al. Age Differences in Identifying Words in Synthetic Speech , 2007, Hum. Factors.
[80] Mark G. Core,et al. Learning intercultural communication skills with virtual humans: Feedback and fidelity. , 2013 .
[81] Wesley Mattheyses,et al. Audiovisual speech synthesis: An overview of the state-of-the-art , 2015, Speech Commun..
[82] R. Mayer,et al. Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .
[83] Simon King,et al. Multisyn: Open-domain unit selection for the Festival speech synthesis system , 2007, Speech Commun..
[84] Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al. Building long-term relationships with virtual and robotic characters: the role of remembering , 2011, The Visual Computer.
[85] Tae Jung Park,et al. Reconsidering the Voice Prinicple with Non-native Language Speakers , 2019, Comput. Educ..
[86] Patrick Gebhard,et al. Exploring interaction strategies for virtual characters to induce stress in simulated job interviews , 2014, AAMAS.
[87] Amy Ogan,et al. "Oh dear stacy!": social interaction, elaboration, and learning with teachable agents , 2012, CHI.
[88] Michael J. Singer,et al. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.
[89] Steve Nebel,et al. Mind your Ps and Qs! How polite instructions affect learning with multimedia , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[90] R. Mayer,et al. An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[91] C. Heyes. Born Pupils? Natural Pedagogy and Cultural Pedagogy , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[92] Ning Wang,et al. The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[93] Noah L. Schroeder,et al. Text-to-Speech Software and Learning: Investigating the Relevancy of the Voice Effect , 2018, Journal of Educational Computing Research.
[94] Richard D. Gilson,et al. Linguistic Cues and Memory for Synthetic and Natural Speech , 2000, Hum. Factors.
[95] Harry Budi Santoso,et al. The Design and Impact of the Pedagogical Agent: A Systematic Literature Review , 2019, The Journal of Educators Online.
[96] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[97] Wafa Johal,et al. When deictic gestures in a robot can harm child-robot collaboration , 2018, IDC.
[98] Penelope Brown,et al. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .