The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.

The European Union's REACH regulation has explicit requirements for reproductive and developmental toxicity data on all substances manufactured in or imported into the European Union at > or = 10 metric tons/year. Meeting the data requirements with whole-animal testing could result in the use of almost 22 million vertebrate animals for the registration of existing chemicals and cost up to several hundred thousand dollars per registered substance. The requirement for financial and animal resources can be reduced by the use of in vitro testing, quantitative structure-activity relationship models, and grouping of related substances. Although REACH strongly encourages these methods of avoiding vertebrate animal testing, it does not appear that in vitro testing or quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis will be able to replace whole-animal reproductive and developmental toxicity testing. Grouping of related compounds offers the possibility, perhaps in conjunction with in vitro testing and structure-activity analysis, of reducing vertebrate animal testing provided there is sufficient information on the related compounds and sufficient reason to believe that the related compounds will have similar toxicological properties. The designation of a substance as a reproductive or developmental toxicant follows criteria that do not consider the dose level of the substance at which reproductive or developmental effects occur, as long as excessive generalized toxicity does not occur. This method of labeling substances without consideration of effective dose level does not provide information on the actual risk of the chemical. Designation of a substance as a reproductive or developmental toxicant may have important implications under REACH and can be expected to result in the need to obtain authorization for marketing of the substance in the European Union.

[1]  Aldert H Piersma,et al.  Validation of the Rat Limb Bud Micromass Test in the International ECVAM Validation Study on Three In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[2]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Rosa García Couto Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) , 2009 .

[4]  Horst Spielmann,et al.  Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation , 2004, Archives of Toxicology.

[5]  A H Piersma,et al.  A Category Approach for Reproductive Effects of Phthalates , 2006, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[6]  Ralf Nordbeck,et al.  Impacts on industry of Europe's emerging chemicals policy REACh. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Wout Slob,et al.  A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: what is the added value of the second generation? , 2007, Reproductive toxicology.

[8]  Aldert H Piersma,et al.  Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing. , 2006, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[9]  Aldert H Piersma,et al.  Validation of the Postimplantation Rat Whole-embryo Culture Test in the International ECVAM Validation Study on Three In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[10]  Susanne Bremer,et al.  Validation of the Embryonic Stem Cell Test in the International ECVAM Validation Study on Three In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[11]  H. Spielmann Predicting the risk of developmental toxicity from in vitro assays. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.