The application of positive matrix factorization in the analysis, characterisation and detection of contaminated soils.

Multivariate factor analytical techniques are widely used for the approximation, in terms of a linear combination of factors, of multivariate experimental data. The chemical composition of soil samples are multivariate in nature and provide datasets suitable for the application of these statistical techniques. Recent developments of multivariate factor analytical techniques have led to the approach of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), a weighted least squares fit of a data matrix in which the weights are determined depending on the error estimates of each individual data value. This approach relies on more physically significant assumptions than methods like Principal Components Analysis which is frequently used in the analysis of soil datasets. In this paper we apply PMF to characterise the pollutant source in a set of geographically referenced soil samples taken within a 200 m radius of a site characterised by a high concentration of heavy metals. Each sample has been analysed for major and minor elements (using wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry), carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen (using a CHN elemental analyzer) and mercury (using cold-vapour atomic absorption spectrometry). Analysis of the soils using PMF resulted in a successful partitioning of variances into sources related to background soil geochemistry, organic influences and those associated with the contamination. Combining these results with a geostatistical approach successfully demarcated the main source of the combined organic and heavy metal contamination.

[1]  P. Paatero,et al.  Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models , 2002 .

[2]  J. Dvonch,et al.  Sources of mercury wet deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  P Minkkinen,et al.  Factor analytical study on water quality in Lake Saimaa, Finland , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[4]  P. Paatero,et al.  Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values† , 1994 .

[5]  P. Paatero,et al.  Source identification of bulk wet deposition in Finland by positive matrix factorization , 1995 .

[6]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  A graphical diagnostic method for assessing the rotation in factor analytical models of atmospheric pollution , 2005 .

[7]  R. Henry.  Receptor Model Applied to Patterns in Space (RMAPS) , 1997 .

[8]  H. Kaiser.  The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[9]  P. Paatero,et al.  Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential areas in Thailand by positive matrix factorization , 2000 .

[10]  W. Shi,et al.  Metal contamination in urban, suburban, and country park soils of Hong Kong: a study based on GIS and multivariate statistics. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models , 2003 .

[12]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty Arising From Sampling: Implications for the Objectives of Geoanalysis† , 1997 .

[13]  P. Paatero.  Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis , 1997 .

[14]  P. Paatero,et al.  Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems , 1993 .

[15]  Han Yongming,et al.  Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contamination in urban dusts of Xi'an, Central China. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  S. Standard.  GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[17]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Identification of Source Nature and Seasonal Variations of Arctic Aerosol byPositive Matrix Factorization , 1999 .

[18]  R. Tertian,et al.  Principles of Quantitative X-ray Fluorescence Analysis , 1982 .

[19]  G. Knoll.  Radiation detection and measurement , 1979 .