PREVALENCE AND RECIDIVISM IN INDEX ARRESTS: A FEEDBACK MODEL

It is important for both theoretical and policy reasons to partition aggregate crime rates into measures of prevalence (reflecting breadth of participation) and incidence (reflecting intensity of participation by those who do engage in crime). Prevalence is measured by accumulating over age the probability of first arrest as a function of age. Incidence is estimated by the probability of recidivism in a feedback model. The probability of a male in U.S. cities over 250,000 population ever being arrested for an index crime is estimated as 25 percent, and is quite different for black males (51 percent) and white males (14 percent). The probability of re-arrest for an index crime is estimated as 85 to 90 percent for both whites and blacks. These estimates highlight the breadth of involvement in index-crime arrests, and suggest that the large differences in race-specific arrest rates are predominantly attributable to difference in participation, and not to differences in recidivism for those who do get involved.

[1]  Michael J. Hindelang,et al.  Race and Involvement in Common Law Personal Crimes. , 1978 .

[2]  Michael J. Hindelang,et al.  Correlates of Delinquency: The Illusion of Discrepancy between Self-Report and Official Measures. , 1979 .

[3]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION OF “CAREER CRIMINALS” FROM “CHRONIC OFFENDERS” IN A COHORT , 1980 .

[4]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Econometric models and economic forecasts , 2002 .

[5]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Problems in Modeling and Measuring Recidivism , 1971 .

[6]  A. Blumstein,et al.  Estimation of Individual Crime Rates from Arrest Records , 1979 .

[7]  John A. Hobbs,et al.  Task Force Report: Science and Technology A Report to the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice , 1969 .

[8]  A. Little.  THE "PREVALENCE" OF RECORDED DELINQUENCY AND RECIDIVISM IN ENGLAND AND WALES. , 1965, American Sociological Review.

[9]  Michael D. Maltz,et al.  The Mathematics of Behavioral Change , 1977 .

[10]  Martin Gold,et al.  Undetected Delinquent Behavior , 1966 .

[11]  M. Gold,et al.  Changing Patterns of Delinquent Behavior Among Americans 13 Through 16 Years Old: 1967-1972. National Survey of Youth Report No. 1. , 1972 .

[12]  Richard Larson,et al.  Models of a Total Criminal Justice System , 1969, Oper. Res..

[13]  D. Farrington.  THE PREVALENCE OF CONVICTIONS , 1981 .

[14]  Reuel Shinnar,et al.  The Effects of the Criminal Justice System on the Control of Crime: A Quantitative Approach , 1975 .

[15]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  Recidivism as a feedback process: An analytical model and empirical validation , 1973 .

[16]  Carl M. Harris,et al.  Failure-Rate Analysis Applied to Recidivism Data , 1974, Oper. Res..

[17]  M. Gold,et al.  From Delinquent Behavior to Official Delinquency , 1972 .