A Welfare Analysis of Social Security in a Dynastic Framework

In this article, we study the welfare effects of unfunded social security in a general equilibrium model populated with overlapping generations of altruistic individuals that differ in lifetime expectancy and earnings ability. Contrary to previous research, our results indicate that steady-state welfare increases with social security for most households, although by very different amounts. This result is mainly due to two factors. First, the presence of two-sided altruism significantly mitigates the crowding out effect of unfunded social security. Second, ability shocks and uncertain lifetimes generate significant heterogeneity among households to yield different induced preferences for social security.

[1]  Laurence J. Kotlikoff,et al.  The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital Accumulation , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Dirk Krueger,et al.  Social Security Reform with Heterogeneous Agents , 1999 .

[3]  K. Judd,et al.  Social Security and Individual Welfare: Precautionary Saving, Liquidityconstraints, and the Payroll Tax , 1985 .

[4]  Selahattin Imrohoroglu.  A Quantitative Analysis of Capital Income Taxation , 1998 .

[5]  Laurence J. Kotlikoff,et al.  Dynamic Fiscal Policy , 1988 .

[6]  Douglas H. Joines,et al.  Social Security in an Overlapping Generations Economy with Land , 1999 .

[7]  J. Laitner.  Random earnings differences, lifetime liquidity constraints, and altruistic intergenerational transfers , 1992 .

[8]  J. Scholz,et al.  Intergenerational Transfers and the Accumulation of Wealth , 1994 .

[9]  R. Barro.  Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Chris I. Telmer,et al.  The risk-sharing implications of alternative social security arrangements ¢ , 1999 .

[11]  J. Scheinkman,et al.  Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 314 Wealth Inequality and Intergenerational Links , 2022 .

[12]  F. Modigliani,et al.  The Role of Intergenerational Transfers and Life Cycle Saving in the Accumulation of Wealth , 1988 .

[13]  Douglas H. Joines,et al.  A life cycle analysis of social security , 1995 .

[14]  Casey B. Mulligan,et al.  Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality , 1998 .

[15]  S. Preston,et al.  Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979-85. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[16]  M. Feldstein,et al.  Social Security and Household Wealth Accumulation: New Microeconomic Evidence , 1979 .

[17]  Gary Solon,et al.  Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States , 1992 .

[18]  Luis M. Cubeddu.  The intra-generational redistributive effects of social security , 1996 .

[19]  David J. Zimmerman,et al.  Regression Toward Mediocrity in Economic Stature , 1992 .

[20]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[21]  Luisa Fuster.  Is Altruism Important for Understanding the Long-Run Effects of Social Security? , 1999 .

[22]  Selahattin Imrohoroglu,et al.  Elimination of Social Security in a Dynastic Framework , 2004 .

[23]  R. Hubbard.  Pension Wealth and Individual Saving: Some New Evidence , 1986 .

[24]  L. Kotlikoff.  Testing the Theory of Social Security and Life Cycle Accumulation , 1979 .