Direct Selective Extraction of Actinides (III) from PUREX Raffinate using a Mixture of CyMe4BTBP and TODGA as 1-cycle SANEX Solvent Part III: Demonstration of a Laboratory-Scale Counter-Current Centrifugal Contactor Process

The direct selective separation of the trivalent actinides americium and curium from a simulated Plutonium Uranium Refining by EXtraction (PUREX) raffinate solution by a continuous counter-current solvent extraction process using miniature annular centrifugal contactors was demonstrated on a laboratory scale. In a 32-stage spiked test (12 stages for extraction, 16 stages for scrubbing, and 4 stages for Am/Cm stripping), an extractant mixture of CyMe4BTBP and TODGA in a TPH/1-octanol mixture was used. The co-extraction of some fission and corrosion product elements, such as zirconium and molybdenum, was prevented by using oxalic acid. Co-extracted palladium was selectively stripped using an L-cysteine scrubbing solution and the trivalent actinides were selectively stripped using a glycolic acid-based stripping solution. It was demonstrated that a selective extraction and high recovery of > 99.4% of the trivalent minor actinides was achieved with low contamination by fission and corrosion products. The product contained 99.8% of the initial americium and 99.4% of the initial curium content. The spent solvent still contained high concentrations of Cu, Cd, and Ni. The experimental steady-state concentration profiles of important solutes were determined and compared with those from computer-code calculations.

[1]  A. Geist,et al.  Development and demonstration of a new SANEX Partitioning Process for selective actinide(III)/lanthanide(III) separation using a mixture of CyMe4BTBP and TODGA , 2013 .

[2]  A. Geist,et al.  Complexation and extraction of trivalent actinides and lanthanides by triazinylpyridine N-donor ligands. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[3]  A. Geist,et al.  Direct Selective Extraction of Actinides(III) from PUREX Raffinate Using a Mixture of CyMe4-BTBP and TODGA as 1-cycle SANEX Solvent PART II: Flow-sheet Design for a Counter-Current Centrifugal Contactor Demonstration Process , 2013 .

[4]  A. Geist,et al.  A review of the demonstration of innovative solvent extraction processes for the recovery of trivalent minor actinides from PUREX raffinate , 2012 .

[5]  A. Geist,et al.  Use of Polyaminocarboxylic Acids as Hydrophilic Masking Agents for Fission Products in Actinide Partitioning Processes , 2012 .

[6]  T. Zevaco,et al.  Actinide(III)/Lanthanide(III) Separation Via Selective Aqueous Complexation of Actinides(III) using a Hydrophilic 2,6-Bis(1,2,4-Triazin-3-Yl)-Pyridine in Nitric Acid , 2012 .

[7]  C. Ekberg,et al.  Studies of a Solvent for GANEX Applications Containing CyMe4-BTBP and DEHBA in Cyclohexanone , 2012 .

[8]  L. Harwood,et al.  Synthesis and Evaluation of Lipophilic BTBP Ligands for An/Ln Separation in Nuclear Waste Treatment: The Effect of Alkyl Substitution on Extraction Properties and Implications for Ligand Design , 2012 .

[9]  R. Malmbeck,et al.  Development of a Solvent Extraction Model for Process Tests in Short Residence Time Centrifugal Contactors , 2012 .

[10]  M. Sarsfield,et al.  Plutonium Loading of Prospective Grouped Actinide Extraction (GANEX) Solvent Systems based on Diglycolamide Extractants , 2012 .

[11]  A. Geist,et al.  Progress towards the development of a new GANEX process , 2012 .

[12]  A. Geist,et al.  The recovery of An(III) in an innovative-SANEX process using a TODGA-based solvent and selective stripping with a hydrophilic BTP , 2012 .

[13]  L. Harwood,et al.  Development of highly selective ligands for separations of actinides from lanthanides in the nuclear fuel cycle , 2011 .

[14]  S. Bryan,et al.  TALSPEAK EXTRACTION SYSTEM UNDER VARIABLE LOADING CONDITIONS - PART 2: SPECIATION STUDIES , 2011 .

[15]  E. M. González-Romero,et al.  Impact of partitioning and transmutation on the high level waste management , 2011 .

[16]  Robin J. Taylor,et al.  ACSEPT-Partitioning technologies and actinide science: Towards pilot facilities in Europe , 2011 .

[17]  M. Drew,et al.  Highly efficient separation of actinides from lanthanides by a phenanthroline-derived bis-triazine ligand. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  G. Modolo,et al.  Direct Selective Extraction of Actinides (III) from PUREX Raffinate using a Mixture of CyMe4BTBP and TODGA as 1-cycle SANEX Solvent , 2011 .

[19]  T. Srinivasan,et al.  Studies on the use of N,N,N′,N′-Tetra(2-Ethylhexyl) Diglycolamide (TEHDGA) for Actinide Partitioning II: Investigation on Radiolytic Stability , 2011 .

[20]  M. Case,et al.  A TRUEX-Based Separation of Americium from the Lanthanides , 2011 .

[21]  A. Geist,et al.  An Improved Hydrolytically-Stable Bis-Triazinyl-Pyridine (BTP) for Selective Actinide Extraction , 2011 .

[22]  C. Ekberg,et al.  A TBP/BTBP-based GANEX Separation Process—Part 2: Ageing, Hydrolytic, and Radiolytic Stability , 2011 .

[23]  Giuseppe Modolo,et al.  Computer code development for flow-sheet design and modeling with verification towards a novel partitioning process , 2011 .

[24]  J. Seppälä,et al.  241st National Meeting and Exposition of the American-Chemical-Society (ACS) , 2011 .

[25]  D. R. Prabhu,et al.  Demonstration of T2EHDGA Based Process for Actinide Partitioning Part II: Counter-Current Extraction Studies , 2010 .

[26]  C. Ekberg,et al.  Thermodynamics of Dissolution for Bis(triazine)−Bipyridine-Class Ligands in Different Diluents and Its Reflection on Extraction , 2010 .

[27]  C. Ekberg,et al.  A TBP/BTBP-based GANEX Separation Process. Part 1: Feasibility , 2010 .

[28]  P. Mohapatra,et al.  Development of T2EHDGA Based Process for Actinide Partitioning. Part I: Batch Studies for Process Optimization , 2010 .

[29]  Emma Aneheim,et al.  Development of a Novel GANEX Process , 2010 .

[30]  K. Nash,et al.  Challenges for Actinide Separations in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 2010 .

[31]  C. Madic,et al.  Actinide Separation Science and Technology , 2010 .

[32]  J. Glatz,et al.  Investigation of the radiolytic stability of a CyMe4-BTBP based SANEX solvent , 2009 .

[33]  A. Geist,et al.  Demonstration of a SANEX Process in Centrifugal Contactors using the CyMe4‐BTBP Molecule on a Genuine Fuel Solution , 2009 .

[34]  G. Modolo,et al.  Demonstration of a TODGA based Extraction Process for the Partitioning of Minor Actinides from a PUREX Raffinate , 2009 .

[35]  G. Modolo,et al.  Demonstration of a TODGA‐Based Continuous Counter‐Current Extraction Process for the Partitioning of Actinides from a Simulated PUREX Raffinate, Part II: Centrifugal Contactor Runs , 2008 .

[36]  B. Boullis,et al.  FUTURE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLES : PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES , 2008 .

[37]  G. Modolo,et al.  Development of a TODGA based Process for Partitioning of Actinides from a PUREX Raffinate Part I: Batch Extraction Optimization Studies and Stability Tests , 2007 .

[38]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Review Article: A Review of the Development and Operational Characteristics of the TALSPEAK Process , 2007 .

[39]  M. Masson,et al.  GANEX: Adaptation of the DIAMEX-SANEX Process for the Group Actinide Separation , 2007 .

[40]  G. Modolo,et al.  DIAMEX Counter‐Current Extraction Process for Recovery of Trivalent Actinides from Simulated High Active Concentrate , 2007 .

[41]  A. Geist,et al.  6,6′‐Bis(5,5,8,8‐tetramethyl‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydro‐benzo[1,2,4]triazin‐3‐yl) [2,2′]bipyridine, an Effective Extracting Agent for the Separation of Americium(III) and Curium(III) from the Lanthanides , 2006 .

[42]  J. Glatz,et al.  Recovery of minor actinides from HLLW using the DIAMEX process , 2005 .

[43]  G. Choppin,et al.  Solvent Extraction of Eu, Th, U, Np and Am with N,N’-Dimethyl-N,N’-dihexyl-3-oxapentanediamide and Its Analogous Compounds , 1996 .

[44]  G. Choppin,et al.  Separations of f Elements , 1995 .

[45]  K. Nash Chapter 121 Separation chemistry for lanthanides and trivalent actinides , 1994 .

[46]  Z. Zolarik Separation of actinides and long-lived fission products from high-level radioactive wastes : a review , 1991 .