The role of mate‐choice copying in speciation and hybridization

Mate‐choice copying, a social, non‐genetic mechanism of mate choice, occurs when an individual (typically a female) copies the mate choice of other individuals via a process of social learning. Over the past 20 years, mate‐choice copying has consistently been shown to affect mate choice in several species, by altering the genetically based expression of mating preferences. This behaviour has been claimed by several authors to have a significant role in evolution. Because it can cause or increase skews in male mating success, it seems to have the potential to induce a rapid change of the directionality and rate of sexual selection, possibly leading to divergent evolution and speciation. Theoretical work has, however, been challenging this view, showing that copying may decelerate sexual selection and that linkage disequilibrium cannot be established between the copied preference and the male trait, because females copy from unrelated individuals in the population, making an invasion of new and potentially fitter male traits difficult. Given this controversy, it is timely to ask about the real impact of mate‐choice copying in speciation. We propose that a solution to this impasse may be the existence of some degree of habitat selection, which would create a spatial structure, causing scenarios of micro‐allopatry and thus overcoming the problem of the lack of linkage disequilibrium. As far as we are aware, the potential role of mate‐choice copying on fostering speciation in micro‐allopatry has not been tackled. Also important is that the role of mate‐choice copying has generally been discussed as being a barrier to gene flow. However, in our view, mate‐choice copying may actually play a key role in facilitating gene flow, thereby fostering hybridization. Yet, the role of mate‐choice copying in hybridization has so far been overlooked, although the conditions under which it might occur are more likely, or less restricted, than those favouring speciation. Hence, a conceptual framework is needed to identify the exact mechanisms and the conditions under which speciation or hybridization are expected. Here, we develop such a framework to be used as a roadmap for future research at the intersection of these research areas.

[1]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Susana Q. Lima,et al.  Mate Choice in Mus musculus Is Relative and Dependent on the Estrous State , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  Robert M. Gibson,et al.  Mate-choice copying in black grouse , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  O. Seehausen Conditions when hybridization might predispose populations for adaptive radiation , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  M. Ryan,et al.  Mixed-species shoals and the maintenance of a sexual–asexual mating system in mollies , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Thomas Getty,et al.  GEIs when Information Transfer is Uncertain or Incomplete , 2014 .

[7]  D. White,et al.  Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  C. ten Cate,et al.  Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish , 2007, Biology Letters.

[9]  R. Duckworth The role of behavior in evolution: a search for mechanism , 2008, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[11]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  P. Henry,et al.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and resilience of vertebrates to increasing climatic unpredictability. , 2010 .

[13]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Mate choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[14]  J. Godin,et al.  Mate-choice copying in free-ranging Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2009 .

[15]  D. Pfaff,et al.  Inadvertent social information and the avoidance of parasitized male mice: a role for oxytocin. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Geographic variation in female mate-copying in the species complex of a unisexual fish, Poecilia formosa , 2008 .

[17]  J. Endler Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[18]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Same-Sex Gaze Attraction Influences Mate-Choice Copying in Humans , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  Rowe,et al.  Sexual selection, speciation and imprinting: separating the sheep from the goats. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Genotype–environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  B. Grant,et al.  Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  B. Galef,et al.  Evidence of social effects on mate choice in vertebrates , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[23]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF HOUSE MICE , 1993 .

[24]  E. Leadbeater Social Learning: What Do Drosophila Have to Offer? , 2009, Current Biology.

[25]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Adaptive introgression of abiotic tolerance traits in the sunflower Helianthus annuus. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[26]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Antler growth and extinction of Irish elk , 1999 .

[27]  J. Streelman,et al.  The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation , 2003 .

[28]  Nordell,et al.  Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .

[29]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[30]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Mauro Santos,et al.  Negative Public Information in Mate Choice Copying Helps the Spread of a Novel Trait , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[32]  T. Mendelson,et al.  The (mis)concept of species recognition. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  S. Alonzo,et al.  Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Y. Tanaka,et al.  Sexual selection enhances population extinction in a changing environment. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  N. Patrik What is ecological speciation , 2012 .

[36]  Curry J. Cunningham,et al.  Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  H. Roche,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .

[38]  Richard H. Wagner,et al.  A taxonomy of biological information , 2010 .

[39]  D. Westneat,et al.  Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  M. M. Coelho,et al.  The evolutionary history of the allopolyploid Squalius alburnoides (Cyprinidae) complex in the northern Iberian Peninsula , 2011, Heredity.

[41]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Copy-when-uncertain: bumblebees rely on social information when rewards are highly variable , 2016, Biology Letters.

[43]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  T. Uller,et al.  Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  M. Feldman,et al.  The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Frédérique Dubois,et al.  Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[48]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .

[49]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Preference for older over younger models during mate-choice copying in young guppies , 2005 .

[50]  M. Gross,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox? , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[51]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[52]  H. Reyer Mating with the wrong species can be right. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  L. Dugatkin Mistakes and the evolution of copying , 2005 .

[54]  M. Lindholm DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis , 2015, Biosemiotics.

[55]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[56]  C. Cate How learning mechanisms might affect evolutionary processes , 2000 .

[57]  M. Wade Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection: Female Choice in a Complex World , 2014 .

[58]  E. Bermingham,et al.  Genetic Evidence for Hybrid Trait Speciation in Heliconius Butterflies , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[59]  R. Brooks The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  R. Dukas Effects of learning on evolution: robustness, innovation and speciation , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  S. Voss,et al.  Rapid fixation of non-native alleles revealed by genome-wide SNP analysis of hybrid tiger salamanders , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[62]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[63]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  H. Kokko,et al.  Local Adaptation and the Evolution of Female Choice , 2014 .

[65]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  R. Lachlan,et al.  FEMALE MATE-CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND SYMPATRIC SPECIATION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[67]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male , 2003 .

[68]  M. Servedio,et al.  Reinforcement and learning , 2007, Evolutionary Ecology.

[69]  M. Ryan,et al.  Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. , 1994, Science.

[70]  A. Houde Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .

[72]  M. Schartl,et al.  Monophyletic origin of multiple clonal lineages in an asexual fish (Poecilia formosa) , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[73]  J. Endler,et al.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.

[74]  J. Höglund,et al.  Copying and sexual selection. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[75]  C. ten Cate,et al.  Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: A reassessment , 1999 .

[76]  D. Waynforth,et al.  Mate Choice Copying in Humans , 2007, Human nature.

[77]  M. Majerus,et al.  Genetics and evolution of female choice , 1986, Nature.

[78]  C. Macías-García,et al.  Ecological evaluation of local extinction: the case of two genera of endemic Mexican fish, Zoogoneticus and Skiffia , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[79]  J. Godin,et al.  Male Mate Choice in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Do Males Prefer Larger Females as Mates? , 2004 .

[80]  J. Endler Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[81]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[82]  S. Stöhr Evolution of mate-choice copying: a dynamic model , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[83]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[84]  Louise S. Mead,et al.  Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection , 2005, Experientia.

[85]  O. Seehausen Hybridization and adaptive radiation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[86]  Chris D. Jiggins,et al.  Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies , 2006, Nature.

[87]  T. Telecky,et al.  Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[88]  I. Coolen,et al.  Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate , 2009, Current Biology.

[89]  T. Juenger,et al.  Sex Chromosome Mosaicism and Hybrid Speciation among Tiger Swallowtail Butterflies , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[90]  S. Alonzo Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[91]  L A Dugatkin,et al.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[92]  K. Kraaijeveld,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation: the comparative evidence revisited , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[93]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Behavioural isolation may facilitate homoploid hybrid speciation in cichlid fish , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[94]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[95]  B. Grant,et al.  The secondary contact phase of allopatric speciation in Darwin's finches , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Copying and Mate Choice , 1996 .

[97]  Antonios Vakirtzis,et al.  Mate Choice Copying and Nonindependent Mate Choice: A Critical Review , 2011 .

[98]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[99]  J. Godin,et al.  Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[100]  E. Sirot,et al.  Mate‐choice copying by females: the advantages of a prudent strategy , 2001 .

[101]  A. Hochkirch,et al.  Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[102]  J. Mallet Hybrid speciation , 2007, Nature.

[103]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[104]  S. Via,et al.  Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[105]  Alexey S Kondrashov,et al.  SYMPATRIC SPECIATION BY SEXUAL SELECTION ALONE IS UNLIKELY , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[106]  K. Laland,et al.  Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. , 1994, Theoretical population biology.

[107]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go. , 2015, Current zoology.

[108]  S. Bertram,et al.  Calling, Courtship, and Condition in the Fall Field Cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus , 2013, PloS one.

[109]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  K. Laland,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF SEXUAL IMPRINTING , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[111]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  Sexual selection in complex environments. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[112]  Hamid Saadati,et al.  Evolution of Leks , 1998 .

[113]  M. Servedio,et al.  The Role of Sexual Selection in Local Adaptation and Speciation , 2017 .

[114]  David J. White,et al.  ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[115]  T. Nishida,et al.  Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[116]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Evolution of Mate Choice Copying by Indirect Selection , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[117]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Genome Patterns of Selection and Introgression of Haplotypes in Natural Populations of the House Mouse (Mus musculus) , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[118]  M J Wade,et al.  Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[119]  L. Dugatkin Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[120]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[121]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection and mate choice. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[122]  A. Pomiankowski The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[123]  Sarah E Hill,et al.  The role of model female quality in the mate choice copying behaviour of sailfin mollies , 2006, Biology Letters.

[124]  K. Pfennig Facultative Mate Choice Drives Adaptive Hybridization , 2007, Science.

[125]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[126]  UDO M. SAVALLI,et al.  Female choice , 1989, Nature.

[127]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[128]  A. Møller Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .

[129]  T. Gosden,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in a Sexual Selection Mosaic , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[130]  Dan G. Bock,et al.  Hybridization and extinction , 2016, Evolutionary applications.

[131]  I. Coolen,et al.  Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .

[132]  E. Hebets,et al.  The complexities of female mate choice and male polymorphisms: Elucidating the role of genetics, age, and mate-choice copying. , 2015, Current zoology.

[133]  M. Correll,et al.  Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[134]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Effects of Hunger on Mate-choice Copying in the GUPPY , 2010 .

[135]  M. Schartl,et al.  Biogeography of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa , 2002 .

[136]  The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[137]  K. Immelmann Ecological Significance of Imprinting and Early Learning , 1975 .

[138]  D. Irwin,et al.  The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[139]  E. Danchin Avatars of information: towards an inclusive evolutionary synthesis. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[140]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[141]  I. Schlupp THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF GYNOGENESIS , 2005 .

[142]  James J. N. Kitson,et al.  Sexual selection protects against extinction , 2015, Nature.

[143]  A. Magurran,et al.  Heterospecific harassment of native endangered fishes by invasive guppies in Mexico , 2008, Biology Letters.

[144]  J. Endler,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[145]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna , 1998 .

[146]  D. Hosken,et al.  The role of genotype‐by‐environment interactions in sexual selection , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[147]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[148]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1996 .

[149]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels , 1935, Journal für Ornithologie.

[150]  E. Danchin,et al.  Inclusive heritability: combining genetic and non-genetic information to study animal behavior and culture , 2010 .

[151]  Mauro Santos,et al.  Mate‐choice copying: A fitness‐enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[152]  M. Andersson Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[153]  H. Kokko,et al.  Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction , 2003 .

[154]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  The role of information in mate-choice copying in female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[155]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[156]  D. Irwin,et al.  Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation , 1999, Heredity.

[157]  Jelena Vukomanovic,et al.  Size‐Dependent Female Mate Copying in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Large Females are Role Models but Small Ones are not , 2007 .

[158]  D. Shuker,et al.  Reproductive interference , 2011, Current Biology.

[159]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  What do we need to know about speciation? , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[160]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[161]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels , 1935, Journal für Ornithologie.

[162]  E. Jablonka,et al.  'Lamarckian' mechanisms in darwinian evolution. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[163]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[164]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Hybridization and speciation , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[165]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other? , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[166]  Bateman Aj Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. , 1948 .