The role of mate‐choice copying in speciation and hybridization
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ingo Schlupp | Margarida Matos | S. A. Varela | I. Schlupp | M. Matos | Susana A M Varela | S. Varela
[1] L. Dugatkin,et al. Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[2] Susana Q. Lima,et al. Mate Choice in Mus musculus Is Relative and Dependent on the Estrous State , 2013, PloS one.
[3] Robert M. Gibson,et al. Mate-choice copying in black grouse , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[4] O. Seehausen. Conditions when hybridization might predispose populations for adaptive radiation , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[5] M. Ryan,et al. Mixed-species shoals and the maintenance of a sexual–asexual mating system in mollies , 1996, Animal Behaviour.
[6] Thomas Getty,et al. GEIs when Information Transfer is Uncertain or Incomplete , 2014 .
[7] D. White,et al. Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[8] C. ten Cate,et al. Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish , 2007, Biology Letters.
[9] R. Duckworth. The role of behavior in evolution: a search for mechanism , 2008, Evolutionary Ecology.
[10] T. Valone,et al. Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.
[11] Diethard Tautz,et al. Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[12] P. Henry,et al. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and resilience of vertebrates to increasing climatic unpredictability. , 2010 .
[13] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. Mate choice , 2007, Current Biology.
[14] J. Godin,et al. Mate-choice copying in free-ranging Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2009 .
[15] D. Pfaff,et al. Inadvertent social information and the avoidance of parasitized male mice: a role for oxytocin. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Geographic variation in female mate-copying in the species complex of a unisexual fish, Poecilia formosa , 2008 .
[17] J. Endler. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[18] Michael L. Platt,et al. Same-Sex Gaze Attraction Influences Mate-Choice Copying in Humans , 2010, PloS one.
[19] Rowe,et al. Sexual selection, speciation and imprinting: separating the sheep from the goats. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[20] Michael D Greenfield,et al. Genotype–environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[21] B. Grant,et al. Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] B. Galef,et al. Evidence of social effects on mate choice in vertebrates , 2000, Behavioural Processes.
[23] F. Bonhomme,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF HOUSE MICE , 1993 .
[24] E. Leadbeater. Social Learning: What Do Drosophila Have to Offer? , 2009, Current Biology.
[25] L. Rieseberg,et al. Adaptive introgression of abiotic tolerance traits in the sunflower Helianthus annuus. , 2010, The New phytologist.
[26] Y. Cohen,et al. Antler growth and extinction of Irish elk , 1999 .
[27] J. Streelman,et al. The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation , 2003 .
[28] Nordell,et al. Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .
[29] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[30] J. Felsenstein. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[31] Mauro Santos,et al. Negative Public Information in Mate Choice Copying Helps the Spread of a Novel Trait , 2014, The American Naturalist.
[32] T. Mendelson,et al. The (mis)concept of species recognition. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[33] S. Alonzo,et al. Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.
[34] Y. Tanaka,et al. Sexual selection enhances population extinction in a changing environment. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.
[35] N. Patrik. What is ecological speciation , 2012 .
[36] Curry J. Cunningham,et al. Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[37] H. Roche,et al. Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .
[38] Richard H. Wagner,et al. A taxonomy of biological information , 2010 .
[39] D. Westneat,et al. Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[40] M. M. Coelho,et al. The evolutionary history of the allopolyploid Squalius alburnoides (Cyprinidae) complex in the northern Iberian Peninsula , 2011, Heredity.
[41] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[42] Lars Chittka,et al. Copy-when-uncertain: bumblebees rely on social information when rewards are highly variable , 2016, Biology Letters.
[43] Mark Kirkpatrick,et al. Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[44] T. Uller,et al. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[45] M. Feldman,et al. The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[46] Frédérique Dubois,et al. Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[47] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[48] J. Bradbury,et al. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .
[49] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Preference for older over younger models during mate-choice copying in young guppies , 2005 .
[50] M. Gross,et al. Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox? , 1990, The American Naturalist.
[51] S. Bikhchandani,et al. Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .
[52] H. Reyer. Mating with the wrong species can be right. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[53] L. Dugatkin. Mistakes and the evolution of copying , 2005 .
[54] M. Lindholm. DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis , 2015, Biosemiotics.
[55] S. Bikhchandani,et al. You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .
[56] C. Cate. How learning mechanisms might affect evolutionary processes , 2000 .
[57] M. Wade. Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection: Female Choice in a Complex World , 2014 .
[58] E. Bermingham,et al. Genetic Evidence for Hybrid Trait Speciation in Heliconius Butterflies , 2010, PLoS genetics.
[59] R. Brooks. The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[60] R. Dukas. Effects of learning on evolution: robustness, innovation and speciation , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[61] S. Voss,et al. Rapid fixation of non-native alleles revealed by genome-wide SNP analysis of hybrid tiger salamanders , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[62] C. M. Lessells,et al. The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .
[63] Hanna Kokko,et al. Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[64] H. Kokko,et al. Local Adaptation and the Evolution of Female Choice , 2014 .
[65] L. Giraldeau,et al. Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[66] R. Lachlan,et al. FEMALE MATE-CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND SYMPATRIC SPECIATION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[67] Klaudia Witte,et al. Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male , 2003 .
[68] M. Servedio,et al. Reinforcement and learning , 2007, Evolutionary Ecology.
[69] M. Ryan,et al. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. , 1994, Science.
[70] A. Houde. Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[71] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .
[72] M. Schartl,et al. Monophyletic origin of multiple clonal lineages in an asexual fish (Poecilia formosa) , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[73] J. Endler,et al. Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.
[74] J. Höglund,et al. Copying and sexual selection. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[75] C. ten Cate,et al. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: A reassessment , 1999 .
[76] D. Waynforth,et al. Mate Choice Copying in Humans , 2007, Human nature.
[77] M. Majerus,et al. Genetics and evolution of female choice , 1986, Nature.
[78] C. Macías-García,et al. Ecological evaluation of local extinction: the case of two genera of endemic Mexican fish, Zoogoneticus and Skiffia , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.
[79] J. Godin,et al. Male Mate Choice in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Do Males Prefer Larger Females as Mates? , 2004 .
[80] J. Endler. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[81] A. Thornton,et al. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.
[82] S. Stöhr. Evolution of mate-choice copying: a dynamic model , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[83] Thomas J Valone,et al. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[84] Louise S. Mead,et al. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection , 2005, Experientia.
[85] O. Seehausen. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[86] Chris D. Jiggins,et al. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies , 2006, Nature.
[87] T. Telecky,et al. Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[88] I. Coolen,et al. Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate , 2009, Current Biology.
[89] T. Juenger,et al. Sex Chromosome Mosaicism and Hybrid Speciation among Tiger Swallowtail Butterflies , 2011, PLoS genetics.
[90] S. Alonzo. Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[91] L A Dugatkin,et al. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[92] K. Kraaijeveld,et al. Sexual selection and speciation: the comparative evidence revisited , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[93] O. Seehausen,et al. Behavioural isolation may facilitate homoploid hybrid speciation in cichlid fish , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[94] Jennifer Small,et al. Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.
[95] B. Grant,et al. The secondary contact phase of allopatric speciation in Darwin's finches , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[96] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. CHAPTER 5 – Copying and Mate Choice , 1996 .
[97] Antonios Vakirtzis,et al. Mate Choice Copying and Nonindependent Mate Choice: A Critical Review , 2011 .
[98] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.
[99] J. Godin,et al. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy , 1996, Animal Behaviour.
[100] E. Sirot,et al. Mate‐choice copying by females: the advantages of a prudent strategy , 2001 .
[101] A. Hochkirch,et al. Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[102] J. Mallet. Hybrid speciation , 2007, Nature.
[103] George C. Williams,et al. Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .
[104] S. Via,et al. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[105] Alexey S Kondrashov,et al. SYMPATRIC SPECIATION BY SEXUAL SELECTION ALONE IS UNLIKELY , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[106] K. Laland,et al. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. , 1994, Theoretical population biology.
[107] Klaudia Witte,et al. Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go. , 2015, Current zoology.
[108] S. Bertram,et al. Calling, Courtship, and Condition in the Fall Field Cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus , 2013, PloS one.
[109] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[110] K. Laland,et al. ON THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF SEXUAL IMPRINTING , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[111] Christine W. Miller,et al. Sexual selection in complex environments. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.
[112] Hamid Saadati,et al. Evolution of Leks , 1998 .
[113] M. Servedio,et al. The Role of Sexual Selection in Local Adaptation and Speciation , 2017 .
[114] David J. White,et al. ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[115] T. Nishida,et al. Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.
[116] Mark Kirkpatrick,et al. The Evolution of Mate Choice Copying by Indirect Selection , 1996, The American Naturalist.
[117] Philipp W. Messer,et al. Genome Patterns of Selection and Introgression of Haplotypes in Natural Populations of the House Mouse (Mus musculus) , 2012, PLoS genetics.
[118] M J Wade,et al. Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[119] L. Dugatkin. Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[120] T. Valone,et al. Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[121] L. Simmons,et al. Sexual selection and mate choice. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[122] A. Pomiankowski. The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.
[123] Sarah E Hill,et al. The role of model female quality in the mate choice copying behaviour of sailfin mollies , 2006, Biology Letters.
[124] K. Pfennig. Facultative Mate Choice Drives Adaptive Hybridization , 2007, Science.
[125] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[126] UDO M. SAVALLI,et al. Female choice , 1989, Nature.
[127] R. Montgomerie,et al. Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[128] A. Møller. Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .
[129] T. Gosden,et al. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in a Sexual Selection Mosaic , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[130] Dan G. Bock,et al. Hybridization and extinction , 2016, Evolutionary applications.
[131] I. Coolen,et al. Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .
[132] E. Hebets,et al. The complexities of female mate choice and male polymorphisms: Elucidating the role of genetics, age, and mate-choice copying. , 2015, Current zoology.
[133] M. Correll,et al. Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[134] L. Dugatkin,et al. Effects of Hunger on Mate-choice Copying in the GUPPY , 2010 .
[135] M. Schartl,et al. Biogeography of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa , 2002 .
[136] The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[137] K. Immelmann. Ecological Significance of Imprinting and Early Learning , 1975 .
[138] D. Irwin,et al. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[139] E. Danchin. Avatars of information: towards an inclusive evolutionary synthesis. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[140] M. Kirkpatrick. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[141] I. Schlupp. THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF GYNOGENESIS , 2005 .
[142] James J. N. Kitson,et al. Sexual selection protects against extinction , 2015, Nature.
[143] A. Magurran,et al. Heterospecific harassment of native endangered fishes by invasive guppies in Mexico , 2008, Biology Letters.
[144] J. Endler,et al. GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[145] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna , 1998 .
[146] D. Hosken,et al. The role of genotype‐by‐environment interactions in sexual selection , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[147] Carel ten Cate,et al. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[148] L. Dugatkin,et al. Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1996 .
[149] K. Lorenz,et al. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels , 1935, Journal für Ornithologie.
[150] E. Danchin,et al. Inclusive heritability: combining genetic and non-genetic information to study animal behavior and culture , 2010 .
[151] Mauro Santos,et al. Mate‐choice copying: A fitness‐enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[152] M. Andersson. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.
[153] H. Kokko,et al. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction , 2003 .
[154] Klaudia Witte,et al. The role of information in mate-choice copying in female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[155] P. Pye-Smith. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.
[156] D. Irwin,et al. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation , 1999, Heredity.
[157] Jelena Vukomanovic,et al. Size‐Dependent Female Mate Copying in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Large Females are Role Models but Small Ones are not , 2007 .
[158] D. Shuker,et al. Reproductive interference , 2011, Current Biology.
[159] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. What do we need to know about speciation? , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[160] Alex Mesoudi,et al. Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[161] K. Lorenz,et al. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels , 1935, Journal für Ornithologie.
[162] E. Jablonka,et al. 'Lamarckian' mechanisms in darwinian evolution. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[163] N. Pierce. Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.
[164] U. Dieckmann,et al. Hybridization and speciation , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[165] S. Pruett-Jones,et al. Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other? , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[166] Bateman Aj. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. , 1948 .