Multi-scale Regularization Approaches of Non-parametric Deformable Registrations

Most deformation algorithms use a single-value smoother during optimization. We investigate multi-scale regularizations (smoothers) during the multi-resolution iteration of two non-parametric deformable registrations (demons and diffeomorphic algorithms) and compare them to a conventional single-value smoother. Our results show that as smoothers increase, their convergence rate decreases; however, smaller smoothers also have a large negative value of the Jacobian determinant suggesting that the one-to-one mapping has been lost; i.e., image morphology is not preserved. A better one-to-one mapping of the multi-scale scheme has also been established by the residual vector field measures. In the demons method, the multi-scale smoother calculates faster than the large single-value smoother (Gaussian kernel width larger than 0.5) and is equivalent to the smallest single-value smoother (Gaussian kernel width equals to 0.5 in this study). For the diffeomorphic algorithm, since our multi-scale smoothers were implemented at the deformation field and the update field, calculation times are longer. For the deformed images in this study, the similarity measured by mean square error, normal correlation, and visual comparisons show that the multi-scale implementation has better results than large single-value smoothers, and better or equivalent for smallest single-value smoother. Between the two deformable registrations, diffeormophic method constructs better coherence space of the deformation field while the deformation is large between images.

[1]  R. Yaparpalvi,et al.  Biological impact of geometric uncertainties: what margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors? , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[2]  Y Chi,et al.  A material sensitivity study on the accuracy of deformable organ registration using linear biomechanical models. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Karl Rohr,et al.  A New Class of Elastic Body Splines for Nonrigid Registration of Medical Images , 2005, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[4]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Non-parametric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with the Demons Algorithm , 2007, MICCAI.

[5]  Valerie Duay,et al.  Dense deformation field estimation for atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Non-rigid matching using demons , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Visualization in biomedical computing , 1999, Parallel Comput..

[13]  R. Yaparpalvi,et al.  A method incorporating 4DCT data for evaluating the dosimetric effects of respiratory motion in single-arc IMAT , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Morten Bro-Nielsen,et al.  Fast Fluid Registration of Medical Images , 1996, VBC.

[15]  R. Deriche,et al.  Regularization and Scale Space , 1994 .

[16]  Luc Florack,et al.  Tikhonov regularization versus scale space: a new result [image processing applications] , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..