Use of digital resources with undergraduate students: Individual profiles and usage-related factors

This article reports on the use of digital resources provided in support of a first year Bachelor course. First, descriptive statistics describing how many and which students consult how many and what types of resources at what moments are provided. Then, logistic regressions are used to identify the determinants—linked to students and resources—of the probability of consulting a given resource. These results can serve as a basis for thinking about the type of resources offered to undergraduate students, and how to introduce them, in order to encourage their use by the greatest number. 1. Également CNRS, FUPL, Université de Lille, UMR 9221 Lille Economie Management (LEM). Sophie Massin L’utilisation de ressources numériques en début de premier cycle universitaire ... 2019 – Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 16(3) ritpu.org 2

[1]  Marie Speare.  Graduate Student Use and Non-use of Reference and PDF Management Software: An Exploratory Study , 2018 .

[2]  L. Porter,et al.  Communication in Organizations. , 1972 .

[3]  Kathryn Unsworth,et al.  Examining the Reference Management Practices of Humanities and Social Science Postgraduate Students and Academics , 2015 .

[4]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[5]  W. Damon,et al.  Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education , 1989 .

[6]  M.-Fabienne Fortin,et al.  Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche : méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives , 2016 .

[7]  J. Dewey,et al.  Knowing and the Known , 1949 .

[8]  D. Paquelin.  La distance : questions de proximités , 2011 .

[9]  Flore Bridoux,et al.  Telework: a challenge to knowledge transfer in organizations , 2010 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Making cooperative learning work , 1999 .

[11]  P. Maubant.  L'analyse des pratiques enseignantes : les ambiguïtés d'un bel objet de recherche , 2007 .

[12]  Merylin Cross,et al.  The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: an integrative review , 2016 .

[13]  N. Metz,et al.  An importance–competence analysis of the roles and competencies of e-tutors at an open distance learning institution , 2018, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[14]  Jessica Bates,et al.  How Can the University Library Better Meet the Information Needs of Research Students? Experiences From Ulster University , 2018 .

[15]  Karin Lundgren-Cayrol,et al.  Apprentissage collaboratif à distance , 2001 .

[16]  Jean Gabin Ntebutse,et al.  L’encadrement de mémoires et de thèses en sciences de l’éducation : enjeux et défis , 2010 .

[17]  J. Jouët.  Retour critique sur la sociologie des usages , 2000 .

[18]  Matt Holland,et al.  Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services (2nd ed.) , 2008 .

[19]  P. Rabardel.  Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains , 1995 .

[20]  Le développement personnel dans les organisations : entre modernité et post-modernité , 2016 .

[21]  Daniel G. Tracy,et al.  LIS Graduate Students as Library Users: A Survey Study , 2014 .

[22]  Trudi E. Jacobson,et al.  Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services: by Carol Collier Kuhlthau. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1993. 219p. $45.00 (cloth). ISBN 0-89391-968-3. $24.50 (paper). ISBN 1-56750-019-6. LC 92-40770 , 1994 .

[23]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[24]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[25]  Nicholas Bloom,et al.  Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment , 2013 .

[26]  Valerie C.L. Spezi,et al.  Is Information-Seeking Behavior of Doctoral Students Changing?: A Review of the Literature (2010–2015) , 2016 .

[27]  P. Vendramin.  TIC et genre : des regards multiples , 2011 .

[28]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Does "Out of Sight" Mean "Out of Mind"? An Empirical Investigation of the Career Advancement Prospects of Telecommuters , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[29]  D. Harrison,et al.  The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  G. Mugny,et al.  Des conflits pour apprendre , 2008 .

[31]  A. Duguet,et al.  Utilisation du numérique par les enseignants à l’université : description et analyse des facteurs explicatifs , 2019, Lien social et Politiques.

[32]  J. F. Veiga,et al.  The Impact of Extent of Telecommuting on Job Satisfaction: Resolving Inconsistent Findings , 2005 .

[33]  Annie Jézégou.  Chapitre 6. La distance, la proximité et la présence en e-Formation , 2019, Traité de la e-Formation des adultes.

[34]  L’amélioration continue pour construire l’organisation apprenante , 2017 .

[35]  Susan E. Thomas,et al.  Where Students Start and What They Do When They Get Stuck: A Qualitative Inquiry into Academic Information-Seeking and Help-Seeking Practices , 2017 .

[36]  Laurie Marrauld,et al.  Télétravail et « travail à distance équipé ». Quelles compétences, tactiques et pratiques professionnelles ? , 2014 .

[37]  A. Barros.  Subjective Well-being (Sb) and Burnout Syndrome (BnS): Correlational Analysis Teleworkers Education Sector , 2017 .

[38]  Jane E. Brindley.  Learner Support in Online Distance Education: Essential and Evolving , 2014 .

[39]  N. Eva,et al.  The Canadian dollar versus the collection: How Canadian university libraries are coping , 2017 .

[40]  Amy Catalano,et al.  Patterns of graduate students' information seeking behavior: a meta-synthesis of the literature , 2013, J. Documentation.

[41]  L. Vygotsky.  Interaction between learning and development , 1978 .

[42]  Hélène Meunier,et al.  Usage des TIC en pédagogie universitaire : point de vue des étudiants , 2011 .

[43]  Serge Proulx,et al.  La sociologie des usages, et après ? , 2015 .

[44]  Michael Coghlan,et al.  Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[45]  D. Ph..  Critères d’évaluation de l’information scientifique à l’ère numérique : cas des étudiants aux cycles supérieurs en éducation des universités québécoises , 2017 .

[46]  L. Taskin.  La Déspatialisation: Enjeu de Gestion , 2010 .

[47]  H. Rempel,et al.  Bibliographic Management Tool Adoption and Use: A Qualitative Research Study Using the UTAUT Model , 2015 .

[48]  F. Larose,et al.  Analyse des pratiques enseignantes et la construction d’un référentiel de compétences : perspectives et contraintes méthodologiques , 2013 .

[49]  Darko Dukić,et al.  Croatian university students' use and perception of electronic resources , 2015 .

[50]  J. Wertsch.  Trends in Soviet cognitive psychology. , 1981, Storia e critica della psicologia.

[51]  A. Tricot,et al.  Qu'est-ce que rechercher de l'information ? , 2010 .

[52]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[53]  Abdul Azeez Kadar Hamsa,et al.  Factors Influencing the Stated Preference of University Employees towards Telecommuting in International Islamic University Malaysia , 2016 .

[54]  Ming-der Wu,et al.  Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries , 2014, Electron. Libr..

[55]  Daniel Peraya.  Distances, absence, proximités et présences : des concepts en déplacement , 2014 .

[56]  Monica D. T. Rysavy,et al.  Students' perceptions of their information literacy skills: the confidence gap between male and female international graduate students , 2017 .

[57]  A. McDowall,et al.  The new nowhere land? A research and practice agenda for the “always on” culture , 2017 .

[58]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research Agenda. , 1997 .

[59]  L. Carter.  Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. , 2014 .

[60]  Cathia Papi,et al.  Les étudiants entre cours magistraux et usage des TIC , 2015 .

[61]  Kourilsky Françoise.  Du désir au plaisir de changer : le coaching du changement , 2008 .

[62]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Competences for online teaching: A special report , 2001 .

[63]  L. Taskin.  Télétravail : Les enjeux de la déspatialisation pour le management humain , 2006 .

[64]  Suzanne Bérubé.  Le coffre à outils du chercheur débutant : Guide d’initiation au travail intellectuel, par Jocelyn Létourneau, Toronto, Oxford University Press, 1989, 227 pages. , 1989 .

[65]  Antonio P. DeRosa.  Evidence Based Library and Information Practice , 2013 .

[66]  A. Largier.  Le télétravail : Trois projets pour un même objet , 2001 .

[67]  A. Baudrit.  L'apprentissage collaboratif: Plus qu'une méthode collective ? , 2007 .

[68]  Nicole Poteaux,et al.  Pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur en France : état de la question , 2013 .

[69]  S. Paivandi,et al.  Les TIC et la relation entre enseignants et étudiants à l’université , 2013 .

[70]  Margaret J. Pitts,et al.  Communication and Teleworking: A Study of Communication Channel Satisfaction, Personality, and Job Satisfaction for Teleworking Employees , 2018 .

[71]  W. Doise,et al.  Le développement social de l'intelligence , 1981 .

[72]  D. Tustin.  Telecommuting academics within an open distance education environment of South Africa: More content, productive, and healthy? , 2014 .

[73]  Hervé Dumez.  Faire une revue de littérature : pourquoi et comment ? , 2011 .

[74]  Albert L. Ingram,et al.  Methods for Analyzing Collaboration in Online Communications , 2004 .

[75]  Birgit Feldmann,et al.  Quality Standards for e-Learning in Vocational Education and Training: The Certified European E-Tutor , 2013, LTEC.

[76]  Timothy D. Golden,et al.  The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction , 2006 .

[77]  R. Felicilda-Reynaldo,et al.  Evaluation of graduate nursing students' information literacy self-efficacy and applied skills. , 2015, The Journal of nursing education.

[78]  Christine Ipsen,et al.  In times of change: How distance managers can ensure employees’ wellbeing and organizational performance , 2017 .

[79]  Amanda B. Click,et al.  International graduate students in the United States: Research processes and challenges , 2018 .

[80]  Catherine E. Déri,et al.  Writing more, better, together: how writing retreats support graduate students through their journey , 2021 .

[81]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Home, Sweet Work: Requirements for Effective Home Working , 1997 .

[82]  V. Boussard,et al.  Sociologie des professions , 2015 .

[83]  Hilary E. Hughes,et al.  First-year international graduate students’ transition to using a United States university library , 2017 .

[84]  A. Baudrit.  Apprentissage collaboratif : des conceptions éloignées des deux côtés de l'Atlantique ? , 2009 .

[85]  J. F. Veiga,et al.  The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[86]  A. Hebert.  Information Literacy Skills of First-Year Library and Information Science Graduate Students: An Exploratory Study , 2018, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.

[87]  Annabelle Boutet,et al.  Mieux comprendre les situations de non-usages des TIC. Le cas d'internet et de l'informatique , 2009, LCN 2009.

[88]  Kathryn L. Fonner,et al.  Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial , 2010 .

[89]  Jean Marie Cook,et al.  A Library Credit Course and Student Success Rates: A Longitudinal Study , 2014, Coll. Res. Libr..

[90]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[91]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[92]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Searching and sourcing online academic literature: Comparisons of doctoral students and junior faculty in education , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..