Mathematical Representations in Science: A Cognitive-Historical Case History

The important role of mathematical representations in scientific thinking has received little attention from cognitive scientists. This study argues that neglect of this issue is unwarranted, given existing cognitive theories and laws, together with promising results from the cognitive historical analysis of several important scientists. In particular, while the mathematical wizardry of James Clerk Maxwell differed dramatically from the experimental approaches favored by Michael Faraday, Maxwell himself recognized Faraday as "in reality a mathematician of a very high order," and his own work as in some respects a re-representation of Faraday's field theory in analytic terms. The implications of the similarities and differences between the two figures open new perspectives on the cognitive role of mathematics as a learned mode of representation in science.

[1]  Jaume Navarro,et al.  Masters of Theory. Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics , 2004 .

[2]  Michael Faraday.  Experimental Researches in Electricity , 1839 .

[3]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[4]  Michael Faraday,et al.  Experimental Researches in Electricity: On the physical character of the lines of magnetic force , 1852 .

[5]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Elke Kurz-Milcke,et al.  The Authority of Representations , 2004 .

[7]  M. D. F.R.S..  LVIII. On the physical character of the lines of magnetic force , 2009 .

[8]  Faraday's notebooks: the active organization of creative science , 1991 .

[9]  M. Norton Wise,et al.  Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin , 1991 .

[10]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[11]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Discovering Discovery: How Faraday Found the First Metallic Colloid , 2006, Perspectives on Science.

[12]  F. Steinle.  Experiments in History and Philosophy of Science , 2002, Perspectives on Science.

[13]  D. Siegel,et al.  Innovation in Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory: Molecular Vortices, Displacement Current, and Light , 1992 .

[14]  John J. Clement,et al.  Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students , 2008 .

[15]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories , 1984 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Scientific discovery: compulalional explorations of the creative process , 1987 .

[17]  Peter Harman,et al.  The natural philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell , 1998 .

[18]  N. Nersessian.  Opening the Black Box: Cognitive Science and History of Science , 1995, Osiris.

[19]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Causal thinking in science: How scientists and students interpret the unexpected , 2005 .

[20]  David C. Gooding,et al.  From Phenomenology to Field Theory: Faraday's Visual Reasoning , 2006, Perspectives on Science.

[21]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Interpreting Scientific and Engineering Practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions , 2003 .

[22]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment , 1978 .

[23]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change , 1999 .

[24]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Role of Imagistic Simulation in Scientific Thought Experiments , 2009 .

[25]  J. Maxwell.  A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[26]  Elizabeth Garber,et al.  The language of physics : the calculus and the development of theoretical physics in Europe, 1750-1914 , 1999 .

[27]  M. Faraday,et al.  The Correspondence of Michael Faraday , 1971 .

[28]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Replication and the Experimental Ethnography of Science , 2004 .

[29]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[30]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[31]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Teaching Introductory Physics , 1996 .

[32]  R. Tweney.  Faraday’s Discovery of Induction: A Cognitive Approach , 1985 .

[33]  D. Gooding.  Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment , 1990 .

[34]  P N Scharbach,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field , 1983 .

[35]  H. H. Skilling,et al.  Fundamentals of electric waves , 1942 .

[36]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Scientific Thinking: A Cognitive- Historical Approach , 2001 .

[37]  Michael Faraday.  Experimental researches in electricity: Twenty-ninth series , 1850 .

[38]  David Gooding,et al.  Experiment and the Making of Meaning , 1990 .

[39]  Lewis Campbell,et al.  The Life of James Clerk Maxwell , .

[40]  K. L. Caneva.  'Discovery' as a site for the collective construction of scientific knowledge , 2005 .

[41]  D. Gooding.  Final Steps to the Field Theory: Faraday's Study of Magnetic Phenomena, 1845-1850 , 1981 .

[42]  Michael Faraday,et al.  Faraday's experimental researches in electricity : guide to a first reading , 2001 .

[43]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Creating Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[44]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Mind in the World: Cognition and Practice in the Invention of the Telephone , 1997 .

[45]  H. Sharlin,et al.  Michael Faraday, A Biography , 1969 .