Exploring the Equivalence of the Aviation Gender Attitude Questionnaire for South African and Australian Pilots: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

The aim of this study was to establish the differential item functioning and construct equivalence of the Aviation Gender Attitude Questionnaire (AGAQ) to determine the generalizability of the instrument across 2 national cultures (South African and Australian). Data were collected from 544 South African and 1,064 Australian aircraft pilots and analyzed by means of various analytical procedures. To establish the intercultural equivalence of the AGAQ, multivariate methods for item analysis and the comparison of factor structures were used. This included analysis of variance, exploratory factor analysis, Procrustean rotation, and the application of single- and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The item-level statistics revealed acceptable item discrimination values, satisfactory item and scale reliabilities, and the absence of item bias for the AGAQ across the 2 cultures. The scale-level statistics confirmed the equivalence of the AGAQ scales for both samples in the aviation contexts. It was unequivocally established that the AGAQ is a valid and culturally nonbiased measure that can be used to assess South African and Australian aviators' perceptions of gender-related pilot behavior.

[1]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[2]  S. Rothmann,et al.  The validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human services survey for emergency medical technicians in Gauteng , 2004 .

[3]  F. V. D. van de Vijver,et al.  Methodological Issues in Psychological Research on Culture , 2000 .

[4]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[6]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Methods and data analysis of comparative research , 1997 .

[7]  S. Rothmann,et al.  Assessment in multicultural groups : The South African case , 2004 .

[8]  Roderick P. McDonald,et al.  Factor Analysis and Related Methods , 1985 .

[9]  L. Tucker.  A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[10]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work , 1993 .

[11]  R. Gregory.  Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications , 1992 .

[12]  Fons J. R. Vijver,et al.  Assessment in Multicultural Groups , 2003 .

[13]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[14]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[15]  Sandra L. Bateman.  Female Air Force Pilots and Combat Aircraft - the Right Stuff Has No Gender , 1987 .

[16]  F. Vijver,et al.  The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery , 1994 .

[17]  Alexandra Kristovics,et al.  How pink is the sky? : a cross-national study of the gendered occupation of pilot , 2005 .

[18]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Human Factors on the Flight Deck , 1996 .

[19]  Ashleigh Merritt,et al.  Culture in the Cockpit , 2000, Journal of cross-cultural psychology.

[20]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures : The Issue of Partial Measurement In variance , 1989 .

[23]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Cockpit Management Attitudes , 1984, Human factors.

[24]  H. Kaiser.  A NOTE ON GUTTMAN'S LOWER BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF COMMON FACTORS1 , 1961 .

[25]  Jim Mitchell,et al.  Gender issues in the flight-deck : an exploratory analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Leopold Petrus Vermeulen,et al.  Development and Validation of a Measure to Assess Perceptions Regarding Gender-Related Pilot Behavior , 2007 .

[27]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[28]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences , 1998 .

[29]  Cockpits, Hangars, Boys and Galleys: Corporate Masculinities and the Development of British Airways , 1998 .

[30]  R L Helmreich.  Exploring flight crew behaviour. , 1987, Social behaviour.

[31]  Leonard S. Feldt,et al.  Testing the Equality of Two Alpha Coefficients , 1996 .

[32]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[33]  J. Hox,et al.  The validity of comparative educational studies , 2005 .

[34]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[35]  M. Barrick,et al.  Construct, Item, and Method Bias of Cognitive and Personality Tests in South Africa , 2005 .

[36]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[37]  M. Davidson,et al.  The Right of Passage? The Experiences of Female Pilots in Commercial Aviation , 2000 .

[38]  H Hoagland,et al.  The right stuff. , 2000, Occupational health & safety.

[39]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Structural Equivalence in Multilevel Research , 2002 .

[40]  T. Cleary,et al.  An Investigation of Item Bias , 1968 .

[41]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology , 1994 .

[42]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  William R. Zwick,et al.  A Comparison of Five Rules for Determining the Number of Components in Complex Patterns , 1983 .