Grounding from a Syntactic Point of View: A Sentential-Logical Approach

We define the term $$\ulcorner $$ ⌜ a set T of sentential-logical formulae grounds a sentential-logical formula A from a syntactic point of view $$\urcorner $$ ⌝ in such a way that A is a syntactic sentential-logical consequence of T , and specific additional syntactic requirements regarding T and A are fulfilled. These additional requirements are developed strictly within the syntactics of sentential-logical languages, the three most important being new, namely: to be atomically minimal, to be minimal in degree, and not to be conjunction-like. Our approach is independent of any specific sentential-logical calculus.

[1]  Benjamin Schnieder,et al.  A LOGIC FOR ‘BECAUSE’ , 2011, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[2]  Armin Tatzel Bolzano's Theory of Ground and Consequence , 2002, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[3]  Gerhard Schurz,et al.  Paradoxes solved by simple relevance criteria , 1986 .