Development and assessment of uni- and multivariable flood loss models for Emilia-Romagna (Italy)

Abstract. Flood loss models are one important source of uncertainty in flood risk assessments. Many countries experience sparseness or absence of comprehensive high-quality flood loss data, which is often rooted in a lack of protocols and reference procedures for compiling loss datasets after flood events. Such data are an important reference for developing and validating flood loss models. We consider the Secchia River flood event of January 2014, when a sudden levee breach caused the inundation of nearly 52 km2 in northern Italy. After this event local authorities collected a comprehensive flood loss dataset of affected private households including building footprints and structures and damages to buildings and contents. The dataset was enriched with further information compiled by us, including economic building values, maximum water depths, velocities and flood durations for each building. By analyzing this dataset we tackle the problem of flood damage estimation in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) by identifying empirical uni- and multivariable loss models for residential buildings and contents. The accuracy of the proposed models is compared with that of several flood damage models reported in the literature, providing additional insights into the transferability of the models among different contexts. Our results show that (1) even simple univariable damage models based on local data are significantly more accurate than literature models derived for different contexts; (2) multivariable models that consider several explanatory variables outperform univariable models, which use only water depth. However, multivariable models can only be effectively developed and applied if sufficient and detailed information is available.

[1]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[2]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage" , 2010 .

[3]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[4]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest , 2015 .

[5]  A. Thieken,et al.  Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas , 2013 .

[6]  Richard A. Olshen,et al.  CART: Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[7]  J.A.E. Ten Veldhuis,et al.  Decision-tree analysis of factors influencing rainfall-related building structure and content damage , 2014 .

[8]  F. Ballio,et al.  Le curve di danno quale strumento a supporto della direttiva alluvioni: criticita’ dei dati italiani , 2012 .

[9]  P. Bates,et al.  Optimal Cross-Sectional Spacing in Preissmann Scheme 1D Hydrodynamic Models , 2009 .

[10]  Francesca Carisi,et al.  Evolution of flood risk over large areas: Quantitative assessment for the Po river , 2015 .

[11]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[12]  B. Merz,et al.  Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings , 2004 .

[13]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[14]  A. R. Scorzini,et al.  Flood damage curves: new insights from the 2010 flood in Veneto, Italy , 2017 .

[15]  Hans de Moel,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity of flood risk calculations for a dike ring in the south of the Netherlands. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach , 2013 .

[17]  Shinichi Morishita,et al.  On Classification and Regression , 1998, Discovery Science.

[18]  Marta Chiarle,et al.  A model for estimating flood damage in Italy: preliminary results , 2006 .

[19]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds , 2009 .

[20]  H. Moel,et al.  Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates , 2011 .

[21]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Probabilistic flood hazard mapping: effects of uncertain boundary conditions , 2013 .

[22]  B. Merz,et al.  Development of FLEMOcs – a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector , 2010 .

[23]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood Risk Mapping At The Local Scale: Concepts and Challenges , 2007 .

[24]  Nicola Berni,et al.  Ex post damage assessment: an Italian experience , 2014 .

[25]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands , 2012 .

[26]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  The TELEMAC modelling system - Special issue , 2000 .

[27]  J. Féral,et al.  IPCC, 2014 - Climate Change 2014 : Synthesis Report. , 2015 .

[28]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings , 2010 .

[29]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach , 2012 .

[30]  C. Arrighi,et al.  Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modelling and census data , 2013 .

[31]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Calibration and validation of FLFA rs -- a new flood loss function for Australian residential structures , 2016 .

[32]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks , 2006 .

[33]  F. Dottori,et al.  A methodology for flood susceptibility and vulnerability analysis in complex flood scenarios , 2018 .

[34]  J. Chatterton,et al.  The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques , 2005 .

[35]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  D. I. Smith Flood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions , 1994 .

[37]  S. M. de Jong,et al.  River flood damage assessment using Ikonos imagery , 2001 .

[38]  P. Bubeck,et al.  How reliable are projections of future flood damage , 2011 .

[39]  Jaroslav Mysiak,et al.  Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[40]  G. La Loggia,et al.  Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  R. Pachauri,et al.  IPCC, Climate Change : Synthesis Report. , 2016 .

[42]  E. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[43]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[44]  Ana Iglesias,et al.  Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Floods and climate: emerging perspectives for flood risk assessment and management , 2014 .

[46]  George C. Runger,et al.  Gene selection with guided regularized random forest , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[47]  Francesca Carisi,et al.  Is anthropogenic land subsidence a possible driver of riverine flood-hazard dynamics? A case study in Ravenna, Italy , 2017 .

[48]  Nicole Goutal,et al.  TELEMAC: A new numerical model for solving shallow water equations , 1991 .

[49]  Roger Alexander Falconer,et al.  Flood hazard assessment for extreme flood events , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[50]  C. Briere,et al.  Assessment of TELEMAC system performances, a hydrodynamic case study of Anglet, France , 2007 .

[51]  Paolo Mignosa,et al.  Simulation of the January 2014 flood on the Secchia River using a fast and high-resolution 2D parallel shallow-water numerical scheme , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[52]  S. Menoni,et al.  The RISPOSTA procedure for the collection, storage and analysis of high quality, consistent and reliable damage data in the aftermath of floods , 2018 .

[53]  Bruno Merz,et al.  How useful are complex flood damage models? , 2014 .

[54]  Dennis J. Parker,et al.  Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods executive summary , 2007 .

[55]  J. Barredo Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970-2006 , 2009 .

[56]  Heidi Kreibich,et al.  Multi-model ensembles for assessment of flood losses and associated uncertainty , 2018 .

[57]  Francesco Dottori,et al.  INSYDE: a synthetic, probabilistic flood damage model based on explicit cost analysis , 2016 .

[58]  Heidi Kreibich,et al.  A Review of Flood Loss Models as Basis for Harmonization and Benchmarking , 2016, PloS one.

[59]  B. Merz,et al.  Tracing the value of data for flood loss modelling , 2016 .

[60]  Animesh K. Gain,et al.  Multi-Variate Analyses of Flood Loss in Can Tho City, Mekong Delta , 2015 .

[61]  B. Merz,et al.  Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling , 2009 .

[62]  Annegret H. Thieken,et al.  Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps , 2013 .

[63]  L. Feyen,et al.  Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates , 2012, Climatic Change.

[64]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Flood loss modelling with FLF-IT: a new flood loss function for Italian residential structures , 2017 .

[65]  H. Kreibich,et al.  Influence of flood frequency on residential building losses , 2010 .

[66]  J. Albertson,et al.  Evidence of an emerging levee failure mechanism causing disastrous floods in Italy , 2015 .

[67]  Daniela Molinari,et al.  On the modeling of significance for flood damage assessment , 2014 .

[68]  B. Merz,et al.  Development and evaluation of FLEMOps - a new Flood Loss Estimation MOdel for the private sector , 2008 .

[69]  Ioan Sporea,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis method for steatosis rating in ultrasound images using random forests. , 2013, Medical ultrasonography.