Detecting spatial patterns in species composition with multiple plot similarity coefficients and singularity measures

Recently, several multiple plot similarity indices have been presented that cure some of the problems associated with the approaches for the calculation of compositional similarity for groups of plots by averaging pairwise similarities. These new indices calculate the similarity between more than two plots whilst considering the species composition on all compared plots. The resulting similarity value is true for the whole group of plots considered (called neighborhood in the following). Here, we review the possibilities for multiple plot similarity calculation and additionally explore coefficients that examine multiple plot similarity between a reference plot (named focal plot in the following) and any number of surrounding plots. The latter represent measures of singularity. Further, we establish a framework for applying these two kinds of multiple plot measures to gridded data including an algorithm for testing the significance of calculated values against random expectations. The capability of multiple plot measures for detecting species compositional gradients and local/regional hotspots within this framework is tested. For this purpose, several artificial data sets with known gradients in species composition (random, gradient, central hotspot, hotspot bottom right) are constructed on the basis of a real data set from a Tundra ecosystem in northern Sweden (Abisko). The coefficients that best reflect the positions of the plots on the realized gradients in species composition are considered as performing best with regard to pattern detection. The tested measures of multiple plot similarity and singularity produced considerably different results when applied to one real and 4 artificial data sets. The newly proposed symmetric singularity coefficient has the best overall performance which makes it suitable for local/regional hotspot detection and for incorporating local to regional similarity analyses in reserve selection procedures.

[1]  O. Arrhenius,et al.  Species and Area , 1921 .

[2]  M. Hill.  Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method , 1974 .

[3]  P. Jaccard.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[4]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[5]  T. O. Crist,et al.  The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea , 2002 .

[6]  Frode Ødegaard,et al.  A multiple-site similarity measure , 2007, Biology Letters.

[7]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities , 2007 .

[8]  M. Fortin,et al.  Delineation of Ecological Boundaries: Comparison of Approaches and Significance Tests , 1995 .

[9]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena , 2010 .

[10]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Complementary representation and zones of ecological transition , 2001 .

[11]  H. Wolda,et al.  Similarity indices, sample size and diversity , 1981, Oecologia.

[12]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data , 2003 .

[13]  Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way , 2011, Oecologia.

[14]  H. Tuomisto.  A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity , 2010 .

[15]  P. Brandmayr,et al.  Hotspots of biodiversity and conservation priorities: A methodological approach , 2010 .

[16]  C. Moreno,et al.  A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? , 2010, Oecologia.

[17]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Effects of quadrat size and data measurement on the detection of boundaries , 1999 .

[18]  S. Openshaw.  A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[19]  E. Maarel.  On the establishment of plant community boundaries , 1976 .

[20]  A. Baselga.  Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[21]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data , 2004 .

[22]  A. Chao,et al.  A Two‐Stage Probabilistic Approach to Multiple‐Community Similarity Indices , 2008, Biometrics.

[23]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[24]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  MEASURING PATTERN DIVERSITY , 1992 .

[25]  R. Whittaker.  Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[26]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Beta Diversity and Nature Reserve System Design in the Yukon, Canada , 2005 .

[27]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[28]  C. Beierkuhnlein,et al.  SPATIAL PATTERNS OF BIODIVERSITY-ASSESSING VEGETATION USING HEXAGONAL GRIDS , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[29]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Sensitivity of Systematic Reserve Selection to Decisions about Scale, Biological Data, and Targets: Case Study from Southern British Columbia , 2004 .

[30]  K. Gaston,et al.  Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover , 2003 .

[31]  P. Williams.  Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Svante Janson,et al.  Measures of ecological association , 1981, Oecologia.

[33]  M. Hill.  Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[34]  Matthew Spencer,et al.  CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR BETA DIVERSITY , 2004 .

[35]  M. Manthey,et al.  Beta diversity metrics and the estimation of niche width via species co‐occurrence data: reply to Zeleny , 2009 .

[36]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  Ecological Diversity and Biodiversity as Concepts for Conservation Planning: Comments on Ricotta , 2006, Acta biotheoretica.

[37]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale , 2001 .

[38]  Sari C. Saunders,et al.  Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes , 2005 .

[39]  Carl Beierkuhnlein,et al.  Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity , 2009, Oecologia.

[40]  T. Koellner,et al.  Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale , 2004 .

[41]  J. Lawton,et al.  The geographic ranges of mammalian species in South America: spatial patterns in environmental resistance and anisotropy , 1998 .

[42]  L. Jost,et al.  Independence of alpha and beta diversities. , 2010, Ecology.

[43]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: A preliminary history , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[44]  S. Ferson,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology , 2002, Springer New York.

[45]  A. Jiménez‐Valverde,et al.  Climate and regional beta‐diversity gradients in spiders: dispersal capacity has nothing to say? , 2010 .

[46]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain , 1992 .

[47]  L. Jost.  Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. , 2007, Ecology.

[48]  H. Tuomisto.  A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist , 2010, Oecologia.

[49]  On Abstract and Concrete Boundaries, Arranging and Classification , 1974 .

[50]  Upward shift of alpine plants increases floristic similarity of mountain summits , 2007 .

[51]  R. Lande.  Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[52]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Partitioning Species Diversity across Landscapes and Regions: A Hierarchical Analysis of α, β, and γ Diversity , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[53]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  A multiple-site similarity measure independent of richness , 2007, Biology Letters.

[54]  Christopher Uhl,et al.  A comparative study of tree establishment in abandoned pasture and mature forest of eastern Amazonia , 1996 .

[55]  Gary C. White,et al.  Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences. , 1981 .

[56]  D. Faith,et al.  Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance , 1987, Vegetatio.

[57]  Z. Hubálek.  COEFFICIENTS OF ASSOCIATION AND SIMILARITY, BASED ON BINARY (PRESENCE‐ABSENCE) DATA: AN EVALUATION , 1982 .

[58]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[59]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[60]  Stasys Jukna,et al.  Extremal Combinatorics - With Applications in Computer Science , 2001, Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series.

[61]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[62]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities , 2010 .