Evaluating stakeholder's perspective on referred out genetic testing in Canada: a discrete choice experiment
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Christian,et al. An assessment of Canadian systems for triaging referred out genetic testing , 2015, Clinical genetics.
[2] J. Schmidtke,et al. Value judgments for priority setting criteria in genetic testing: a discrete choice experiment. , 2015, Health policy.
[3] Pascal Borry,et al. Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[4] W. Burke,et al. Debating Clinical Utility , 2010, Public Health Genomics.
[5] Timothy Caulfield,et al. Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers , 2009, BMC medical ethics.
[6] D. Menon,et al. Engaging the public in priority‐setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens’ jury , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[7] Douglas K. Martin,et al. Priority-setting for healthcare: who, how, and is it fair? , 2007, Health policy.
[8] Emily Lancsar,et al. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare , 2002, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.