Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony

A large body of research has explored the factors that impede established firms' responses to radical technological changes. While it is widely acknowledged that managers face pressures from financial markets to choose strategies that maximize shareholder value, little work in the technological change literature has considered the possible influences of public equity markets and the securities analysts who mediate them on incumbent firms challenged with technological change. In this paper, I begin to address the topic by empirically exploring how securities analysts react to the different strategies undertaken by incumbent firms faced with radical technological change. I study the question in two settings: the shift to digital technology in photography and the advent of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology in wireline telecommunications. I find evidence that analysts are more attentive and positive toward incumbents' strategies that extend and preserve the existing technology than toward strategies that respond directly to the new technology. In these settings, analysts largely ignore incumbents' strategies that directly incorporate the new technology for several years following the discontinuity. This study provides insights into the nature and direction of analysts' reactions to firms' strategies in the context of technological change, and is a first step toward better understanding of the potential role of analysts' and financial markets in incumbent adaptation.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[3]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Corporate Strategy, Analyst Coverage, and the Uniqueness Discount , 2012 .

[4]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts , 2003 .

[5]  Scott O. Lilienfeld,et al.  What's wrong with this picture? , 2001, Scientific American.

[6]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[7]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  on Analysts ' Forecasts , 2005 .

[8]  Alun C. Davies,et al.  Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World. , 1984 .

[9]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[10]  B. Lev,et al.  Do financial analysts get intangibles? , 2003 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[13]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[14]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[15]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[16]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Shrewd, crude or simply deluded? Comovement and the internet stock phenomenon , 2004 .

[17]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  The Information Technology Revolution and the Stock Market: Evidence , 2000 .

[18]  Amy K. Glasmeier,et al.  Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry * , 1991 .

[19]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers , 1981 .

[20]  Mary J. Benner The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change , 2007 .

[21]  Jennifer Francis,et al.  ANALYSTS DECISIONS AS PRODUCTS OF A MULTITASK ENVIRONMENT , 1993 .

[22]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Calculators, Lemmings or Frame-Makers? The Intermediary Role of Securities Analysts , 2007 .

[23]  Kent L. Womack Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value? , 1996 .

[24]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Security Analysts' Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts , 1998 .

[25]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[26]  John Laitner,et al.  Technological Change and the Stock Market , 2003 .

[27]  Mariana Mazzucato Risk, variety and volatility: innovation,growth and stock prices in old and new , 2003 .

[28]  M. Bradshaw How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations? , 2000 .

[29]  A. Cooper,et al.  How established firms respond to threatening technologies , 1992 .

[30]  Brian J. Bushee The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior , 1999 .

[31]  Pietro Veronesi,et al.  Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices , 2005 .

[32]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[33]  E. Fama EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[34]  E. Ofek,et al.  Bustup Takeover of Value-Destroying Diversified Firms , 1994 .

[35]  Roni Michaely,et al.  Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations , 1999 .

[36]  S. C. Myers,et al.  Principles of Corporate Finance - 4/E , 2002 .

[37]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[39]  Bruce D. Phelps Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns , 2001 .

[40]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Capability Reconfiguration: An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change , 2006 .

[41]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .

[42]  Pamela S. Tolbert Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[43]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[44]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[45]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[47]  Michael Useem,et al.  Investor Capitalism : How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America , 1996 .

[48]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[49]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[50]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[51]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[53]  G Grant Polaroid Corporation. , 1979, Industry and health care.

[54]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  Top Management, Company Directors and Corporate Control , 2001 .

[55]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[56]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[57]  J. B. Heaton,et al.  Competing Theories of Financial Anomalies , 2001 .

[58]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[59]  S. Kothari,et al.  Determinants of the Informativeness of Analyst Research , 2003 .

[60]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: the Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials , 1999 .

[61]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance , 2002 .

[62]  Carroll-Johnson Rm,et al.  What's wrong with this picture? , 1996, Oncology nursing forum.

[63]  Mariana Mazzucato Risk, variety and volatility: growth, innovation and stock prices in early industry evolution , 2003 .

[64]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[65]  Lance E. Davis,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. By Douglass C. North. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. viii + 152 pp. Cloth, $32.50; paper, $10.95.) , 1992 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[67]  Brian J. Bushee Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings Over Long-Run Value? , 1999 .

[68]  Daniel A. Levinthal Surviving Schumpeterian Environments: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1992 .

[69]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[70]  Brian J. Bushee Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings Over Long-Run Value? , 1999 .

[71]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[72]  F. Rothaermel Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation , 2001 .

[73]  Mary Tripsas UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[74]  Kenneth A. Froot,et al.  Herd on the Street: Informational Inefficiencies in a Market with Short-Term Speculation , 1990 .

[75]  Thomas Z. Lys,et al.  The association between revisions of financial analysts' earnings forecasts and security-price changes , 1990 .

[76]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  Attention, Demographics, and the Stock Market , 2005 .

[77]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[78]  W. Mitchell Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents' Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields , 1989 .

[79]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Focusing the Corporate Product: Securities Analysts and De-diversification , 2000 .

[81]  Sundaresh Ramnath,et al.  The Financial Analyst Forecasting Literature: A Taxonomy with Suggestions for Further Research , 2008 .