The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products

Previous literature on open source software (OSS) mostly analyzes organizational issues within communities of developers and users. This paper focuses on for-profit organizations that release software products under OSS licenses, and argues that variations in their endowments of intellectual property rights, namely patents and trademarks, help to determine which firms will tend to incorporate OSS into commercial products. We explain whether and under what conditions preexisting stocks of intellectual property rights can be useful complementary assets that allow firms to benefit directly or indirectly from commercializing OSS products, and test our hypotheses on a novel data set built on firms' announcements of OSS product releases in the specialized press between 1995 and 2003. We find three robust results: (a) firms with large stocks of software patents are more likely to release OSS products; (b) firms with large stocks of software trademarks are less likely to release OSS products; (c) firms with large stocks of hardware trademarks are more likely to release OSS products.

[1]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Adoptions and Orphans in the Early Microcomputer Market , 2003 .

[2]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[3]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1981 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[6]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  The Private Value of Software Patents , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[8]  Pamela Samuelson.  IBM's pragmatic embrace of open source , 2006, CACM.

[9]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[10]  C. Trlica.  Software applications , 1996 .

[11]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Knowledge Reuse in Open Source Software: An Exploratory Study of 15 Open Source Projects , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Kathleen Reavis Conner,et al.  Strategies for product cannibalism , 1988 .

[14]  Jack Koenig,et al.  Seven Open Source Business Strategies for Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[15]  Barry G. Blundell.  Computer Hardware , 2008 .

[16]  R. L. Parr,et al.  Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets , 1989 .

[17]  Baruch Lev,et al.  Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, and Risks , 2003 .

[18]  Mary Tripsas.  UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[19]  P. Ghemawat.  Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia , 1991 .

[20]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[21]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  New ventures based on open innovation - an empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Industrial Organisation and Innovation , 1998 .

[24]  Kenneth W. Dam.  Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software , 1995, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[26]  James Bessen,et al.  medium provided this notice is preserved. AN EMPIRICAL LOOK AT SOFTWARE PATENTS , 2004 .

[27]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Adaptive Entry Strategies Under Dominant Standards - Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry , 2004 .

[28]  Ronald J. Mann.  The Commercialization of Open Source Software: Do Property Rights Still Matter? , 2006 .

[29]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Proprietary vs. Public Domain Licensing of Software and Research Products , 2005 .

[30]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[31]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[32]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[33]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Incumbents' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry , 1992 .

[35]  R Ogden,et al.  An open secret. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[36]  A. Arora.  Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[37]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty , 2001 .

[38]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Sampling in Open Source Software Development: The Case for Using the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[40]  K. Pavitt.  Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't , 1998 .

[41]  Deon van der Walt,et al.  Valuation of intellectual property and intangible assets , 2010 .

[42]  曹壽民,et al.  商標價值攸關性之研究; The Value-Relevance of Trademarks , 2003 .

[43]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models , 1985 .

[44]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[45]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[46]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Journal of business and economic statistics 5: Garcia-Ferrer, A. et al., Macroeconomic forecasting using pooled international data, (1987), 53-67 , 1988 .

[47]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms , 2005 .

[48]  R. Merges,et al.  Specialized supply firms, property rights and firm boundaries , 2004 .

[49]  Frank Hecker,et al.  Setting Up Shop: The Business of Open-Source Software , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[50]  Ronald J. Mann.  Commercializing Open Source Software: Do Property Rights Still Matter? , 2006 .

[51]  Joseph V. Terza,et al.  Estimating count data models with endogenous switching: Sample selection and endogenous treatment effects , 1998 .

[52]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis.  Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[54]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[55]  Siobhan O’Mahony.  Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .

[56]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Linear Models and Extensions , 2001 .

[57]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[58]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Industrial Organisation and Innovation: An International Study of the Software Industry , 1998 .