The role of life events and context in type of car share uptake: Comparing users of peer-to-peer and cooperative programs in Oslo, Norway

Abstract This paper builds on a survey of existing users of two car sharing schemes in Oslo, namely Nabobil (peer-to-peer scheme P2P) and Bilkollektivet (cooperative scheme Coop), to understand how the following factors lead to active (or passive) car sharing – i. key life-events; ii. adoption/retention challenges; iii. acceptability; and iv. infrastructural needs. The conceptual framework of this study is informed by mobility biographies and social practice theory. A web-based questionnaire was distributed by the two service providers to their members, and approximately 1,724 users of P2P and 1,117 users of Coop participated in the survey. The survey collected information on travel behaviour, preferences, life-stages, mobility biography of the household, and life-events possibly leading to car sharing. Results highlight that using P2P scheme emerged as statistically significant for students moving to Oslo and for employees starting in new jobs. For the Coop members, the birth of first or later children were statistically significant events in households’ decision to start with car sharing. Along with differences in meanings, skills, materiality and practices of carsharing, users of the two schemes varied with respect to spatial details as well – proximity to transit-stops, access to high-frequency public transport services, walking/cycling infrastructure and, parking facilities. Further, for carsharing to become popular, ample institutional trust, capable of off-setting any lack of trust that users may have, needs to be built.

[1]  Robyn Dowling,et al.  Puncturing automobility? Carsharing practices , 2013 .

[2]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Understanding the process that gives rise to household car ownership level changes , 2016 .

[3]  J. Scheiner MOBILITY BIOGRAPHIES: ELEMENTS OF A BIOGRAPHICAL THEORY OF TRAVEL DEMAND , 2007 .

[4]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Interdependencies between turning points in life and long-term mobility decisions , 2012 .

[5]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Life events and mobility milestones: Advances in mobility biography theory and research , 2016 .

[6]  M. Lanzendorf,et al.  Mobility biographies: A review of achievements and challenges of the mobility biographies approach and a framework for further research , 2015 .

[7]  Mette Jensen,et al.  Passion and heart in transport: a sociological analysis on transport behaviour , 1999 .

[8]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[9]  Jessica ter Schure,et al.  Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds , 2005 .

[10]  Henner Gimpel,et al.  Consumer motives for peer-to-peer sharing , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Growth in Worldwide Carsharing , 2007 .

[12]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[13]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends , 2013 .

[14]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Carlessness in a car‐centric world: A reconstructive approach to qualitative mobility biographies research , 2016 .

[15]  Anders Hjalmarsson,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Service Sharing Platforms: Driving Share and Share Alike on a Mass-Scale , 2013, ICIS.

[16]  Matthew Watson,et al.  How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system , 2012 .

[17]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[18]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  Understanding innovation in practice: a discussion of the production and re-production of Nordic Walking , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[20]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF KEY EVENTS AND CRITICAL INCIDENTS ON TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE SWITCHING BEHAVIOUR: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[21]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters , 2015 .

[22]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  North American Carsharing , 2009 .

[23]  Kiron Chatterjee,et al.  Triggers for changes in cycling: the role of life events and modifications to the external environment , 2013 .

[24]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Moving across the life course: A biographic approach to researching dynamics of everyday mobility practices , 2018 .

[25]  Steven Spears Beyond the Early Adopters: Examining the potential for car-sharing in Richmond, Virginia , 2008 .

[26]  Michel G. Mueller,et al.  Analysing mobility biographies with the life course calendar: a retrospective survey methodology for longitudinal data collection , 2015 .