On determining unknown functions in differential systems, with an application to biological reactors.

In this paper, we consider general nonlinear systems with observations, containing a (sin- gle) unknown function ': We study the possibility to learn about this unknown function via the observations: if it is possible to determine the (values of the) unknown function from any experiment (on the set of states visited during the experiment), and for any arbitrary input function, on any time interval, we say that the system is \identiable". For systems without controls, we give a more or less complete picture of what happens for this identiability property. This picture is very similar to the picture of the \observation theory" in (7): 1. if the number of observations is three or more, then, systems are generically identiable; 2. if the number of observations is 1 or 2, then the situation is reversed. Identiability is not at all generic. In that case, we add a more tractable innitesimal condition, to dene the \innitesimal identiability" property. This property is so restrictive, that we can almost characterize it (we can characterize it by geometric properties, on an open-dense subset of the product of the state space X by the set of values of '). This, surprisingly, leads to a non trivial classication, and to certain corresponding \identiability normal forms". Contrarily to the case of the observability property, in order to identify in practice, there is in general no hope to do something better than using \approximate dierentiators", as show very elementary examples. However, a practical methodology is proposed in some cases. It shows very reasonable performances. As an illustration of what may happen in controlled cases, we consider the equations of a biological reactor, (2,4), in which a population is fed by some substrate. The model heavily depends on a \growth function", expressing the way the population grows in presence of the substrate. The problem is to identify this \growth function". We give several identiability results, and identication methods, adapted to this problem. Mathematics Subject Classication. | Please, give AMS classication codes |.

[1]  J. Gauthier,et al.  Observability for systems with more outputs than inputs and asymptotic observers , 1996 .

[2]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  HIGH-GAIN AND NON-HIGH-GAIN OBSERVERS FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[3]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  Finite singularities of nonlinear systems. Output stabilization, observability, and observers , 1995 .

[4]  F. Monroy-Pérez,et al.  Contemporary trends in nonlinear geometric control theory and its applications , 2002 .

[5]  R. Hardt Stratification of real analytic mappings and images , 1975 .

[6]  H. Shim,et al.  A Simple Observer for Nonlinear Systems in x-coordinate using Lipschitz Extension Technique , 2000 .

[7]  M. Goresky,et al.  Stratified Morse theory , 1988 .

[8]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  Observability and observers for non-linear systems , 1986 .

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  J. Gauthier,et al.  A simple observer for nonlinear systems applications to bioreactors , 1992 .

[11]  R. M. Hirschorn Invertibility of Control Systems on Lie Groups , 1977 .

[12]  H. Sussmann Some optimal control applications of real-analytic stratifications and desingularization , 1998 .

[13]  Denis Dochain,et al.  ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF BIOREACTORS , 1990 .

[14]  B. Dundas,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY , 2002 .

[15]  J. Gauthier,et al.  Deterministic Observation Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[16]  R. Hirschorn Invertibility of Nonlinear Control Systems , 1979 .

[17]  M. Shiota Geometry of subanalytic and semialgebraic sets , 1997 .