Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling

Abstract GIS data processing and spatial analysis, together with modern decision analysis techniques, were used in this study to improve habitat suitability evaluation over large areas. Both empirical evaluation models and models based on expert knowledge can be applied in this approach. The habitat requirements of species were described as map layers within GIS so that each map layer represented one criterion. GIS was used as the platform in managing, combining and displaying the criterion data and also as a tool for producing new data, especially by utilising spatial analysis functions. Criterion standardisation, weighting and combining were accomplished by means of multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) methods, the theoretical background being based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT). By using continuous priority and sub-priority functions in the evaluation, no classification of continuous attributes was needed and also non-linear relationships between habitat suitability and the attributes could be considered. Sensitivity analysis was applied to consider the temporal factor in the analysis and to find out the effect of different criteria weights on the spatial pattern of the suitability index. Changing the weights of permanent and time-changeable habitat factors shifted the location of optimal habitats for the species. In the long run, permanent factors such as soil properties define the habitat potential, which is important to take into consideration; e.g. in forest management planning and species conservation. The method is illustrated by a case study in which habitat suitability maps were produced for an old-forest polypore, Skeletocutis odora .

[1]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[2]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Methods for Generating Land Suitability Maps : A Comparative Evaluation , 2013 .

[3]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves , 1997 .

[4]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Integrating forest-level and compartment-level indices of species diversity with numerical forest planning. , 1997 .

[5]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[6]  Stephen J. Carver,et al.  Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  P. Leskinen Measurement scales and scale independence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[8]  Jess W. Everett,et al.  Landfill Siting Using Geographic Information Systems: A Demonstration , 1996 .

[9]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  P. Leskinen,et al.  Regression Methods for Pairwise Comparison Data , 2001 .

[11]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Environmental Modeling with GIS , 1994 .

[12]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning , 1995 .

[13]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  Modelling habitat quality for arboreal marsupials in the South Coastal forests of New South Wales, Australia , 1995 .

[14]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[15]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analyzing consistency of experts' judgments: Case of assessing forest biodiversity , 1998 .

[16]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to GIS-Based Land Suitability Evaluation , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[18]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Uncertainty in Expert Predictions of the Ecological Consequences of Forest Plans , 1996 .

[19]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making , 1993 .

[20]  J. Voogd,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning , 1982 .

[21]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Ekologiset mallit ja ekologisten riskien hallinta metsäsuunnittelussa , 1970 .

[22]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Integrating Geographical Information Systems and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[24]  Heikki Kotiranta,et al.  Uhanalaiset käävät Suomessa , 1993 .

[25]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning , 1990 .