Examining personal values in extreme environment contexts: Revisiting the question of generalizability

Land-based extreme environments (e.g. polar expeditions, Antarctic research stations, confinement chambers) have often been used as analog settings for spaceflight. These settings share similarities with the conditions experienced during space missions, including confinement, isolation and limited possibilities for evacuation. To determine the utility of analog settings for understanding human spaceflight, researchers have examined the extent to which the individual characteristics (e.g., personality) of people operating in extreme environments can be generalized across contexts (Sandal, 2000) [1]. Building on previous work, and utilising new and pre-existing data, the present study examined the extent to which personal value motives could be generalized across extreme environments. Four populations were assessed; mountaineers (N =59), military personnel (N = 25), Antarctic over-winterers (N = 21) and Mars simulation participants (N = 12). All participants completed the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ; Schwartz; 2) capturing information on 10 personal values. Rank scores suggest that all groups identified Self-direction, Stimulation, Universalism and Benevolence as important values and acknowledged Power and Tradition as being low priorities. Results from difference testing suggest the extreme environment groups were most comparable on Self-direction, Stimulation, Benevolence, Tradition and Security. There were significant between-group differences on five of the ten values. Overall, findings pinpointed specific values that may be important for functioning in challenging environments. However, the differences that emerged on certain values highlight the importance of considering the specific population when comparing results across extreme settings. We recommend that further research examine the impact of personal value motives on indicators of adjustment, group working, and performance. Information from such studies could then be used to aid selection and training processes for personnel operating in extreme settings, and in space.

[1]  G. Sandal,et al.  Value diversity and crew relationships during a simulated space flight to Mars , 2015 .

[2]  Lawrence A Palinkas,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in psychosocial adaptation to isolated and confined environments. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Jelena Brcic,et al.  Universal values of Canadian astronauts , 2012 .

[4]  L A Palinkas,et al.  Predictors of behavior and performance in extreme environments: the Antarctic space analogue program. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  B. Meglino,et al.  The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An exami , 1994 .

[7]  P. Gollwitzer The Volitional Benefits of Planning , 1996 .

[8]  G. R. Leon,et al.  Personality, Personal Values and Growth in Military Special Unit Patrol Teams Operating in a Polar Environment , 2013 .

[9]  Holger Ursin,et al.  Personality and coping strategies during submarine missions. , 2003, Human performance in extreme environments : the journal of the Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments.

[10]  E. Gunderson Psychological Studies in Antarctica , 2013 .

[11]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Personal growth following long-duration spaceflight ☆ , 2012 .

[12]  Nick Kanas,et al.  Positive psychological outcomes of spaceflight: an empirical study. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Gaining deeper insight into the psychological challenges of human spaceflight: The role of motivational dynamics , 2016 .

[14]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[15]  Gloria R. Leon,et al.  Decision Processes and Interactions During a Two-Woman Traverse of Antarctica , 2004 .

[16]  G. R. Leon,et al.  Human performance in polar environments , 2011 .

[17]  S. Schwartz An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values , 2012 .

[18]  Frank White,et al.  The Overview Effect: Space Exploration and Human Evolution, Second Edition , 1987 .

[19]  P. Suedfeld Space memoirs: Value hierarchies before and after missions—A pilot study , 2006 .

[20]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[21]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Psychological effects of polar expeditions , 2008, The Lancet.

[22]  G. R. Leon,et al.  Positive Experiences and Personal Growth in a Two-Man North Pole Expedition Team , 2011 .

[23]  Gro M Sandal,et al.  Personality characteristics and trait clusters in final stage astronaut selection. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  L. Hardy,et al.  Great expectations: different high-risk activities satisfy different motives. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  A. van den Broeck,et al.  Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction , 2008 .

[26]  H Ursin,et al.  Psychological reactions during polar expeditions and isolation in hyperbaric chambers. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[27]  Lawrence A. Palinkas,et al.  Effects of Physical and Social Environments on the Health and Well-Being of Antarctic Winter-Over Personnel , 1991 .

[28]  S. Schwartz Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. , 2007 .

[29]  Gloria R. Leon,et al.  The “Right Stuff” for a Solo Sailboat Circumnavigation of the Globe , 2015 .

[30]  A. Waterman,et al.  Predicting the Subjective Experience of Intrinsic Motivation: The Roles of Self-Determination, the Balance of Challenges and Skills, and Self-Realization Values , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[31]  Fons J. R. van de Vijver,et al.  Personal values and crew compatibility: Results from a 105 days simulated space mission , 2011 .

[32]  Robert J. Biersner,et al.  Personality correlates of adjustment in isolated work groups , 1984 .

[33]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education , 1989 .

[34]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[35]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[36]  Shanique G. Brown,et al.  Team Composition Issues for Future Space Exploration: A Review and Directions for Future Research. , 2015, Aerospace medicine and human performance.

[37]  A. G. Vinokhodova,et al.  Study of values and interpersonal perception in cosmonauts on board of international space station , 2014 .

[38]  S. Schwartz Value Priorities and Behavior: Applying a Theory of Integrated Value Systems , 2001 .

[39]  G M Sandal,et al.  Coping in Antarctica: is it possible to generalize results across settings? , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[40]  Shalom H. Schwartz Les valeurs de base de la personne : théorie, mesures et applications , 2006 .

[41]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Changes in the hierarchy of value references associated with flying in space. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[42]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Predicting astronaut effectiveness: a multivariate approach. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.