An automatic form error evaluation method for characterizing micro-structured surfaces

Ultra-precision micro-structured surfaces are becoming increasingly important in a range of application areas, including engineering optics, biological products, metrology artifacts, data storage, etc. However, there is a lack of surface characterization methods for the micro-structured surfaces with sub-nanometer accuracy. Although some research studies have been conducted on 3D surface characterization, most of them are on freeform surfaces, which are difficult to be applied on the micro-structured surfaces because of their limited characterization accuracy and the repeated surface feature patterns in the micro-structured surfaces. In this paper, an automatic form error evaluation method (AFEEM) is presented to characterize the form accuracy of the micro-structured surfaces. The machined micro-structured surface can be measured by any 3D high resolution measurement instrument. The measurement data are converted and pre-processed for the AFEEM, which mainly consists of a coarse registration and a fine registration process. The coarse registration estimates an initial position of the measured surface for the fine registration by extracting the most perceptually salient points in the surfaces, computing the integral volume descriptor for each salient point, searching for the best triplet-point correspondence and calculating the coarse registration matrix. The fine registration aligns the measured surface to the designed surface by a proposed adaptive iterative closest point algorithm to guarantee sub-nanometer accuracy for surface characterization. A series of computer simulations and experimental studies were conducted to verify the AFEEM. Results demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of the AFEEM for characterizing the micro-structured surfaces.

[1]  Yuichi Okazaki,et al.  Precision nano-fabrication and evaluation of a large area sinusoidal grid surface for a surface encoder , 2003 .

[2]  Enrico Savio,et al.  An artefact for traceable freeform measurements on coordinate measuring machines , 2002 .

[3]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis: A Probabilistic Approach , 2007 .

[5]  Pierre Alliez,et al.  Anisotropic polygonal remeshing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[6]  Chi Fai Cheung,et al.  Measurement and characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces using an intrinsic surface feature-based method , 2010 .

[7]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Christopher J. Evans,et al.  “Structured”, “Textured” or “Engineered” Surfaces , 1999 .

[9]  Geok Soon Hong,et al.  Automatic Surface Characterization for Micro-Structured Surfaces Fabricated by Fast Tool Servo Diamond Turning , 2010 .

[10]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Agostino G. Bruzzone,et al.  Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance , 2008 .

[12]  Alberto Del Bimbo,et al.  Spin images for retrieval of 3D objects by local and global similarity , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[13]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  A new free-form surface fitting method for precision coordinate metrology , 2009 .

[14]  Suet To,et al.  Measuring optical freeform surfaces using a coupled reference data method , 2007 .

[15]  Anath Fischer,et al.  Verification of 3D freeform parts by registration of multiscale shape descriptors , 2010 .

[16]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  T. Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory : A Basic Tool for Analysing Structures at Different Scales , 1994 .

[18]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology , 2009 .

[20]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[21]  Kari Pulli,et al.  Multiview registration for large data sets , 1999, Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.PR00062).

[22]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  Optimal shape error analysis of the matching image for a free-form surface , 2001 .

[23]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  Salient critical points for meshes , 2007, Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling.

[24]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Mesh saliency , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.

[25]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Suet To,et al.  An integrated form characterization method for measuring ultra-precision freeform surfaces , 2007 .

[27]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Integral Invariant Signatures , 2004, ECCV.

[28]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Object modelling by registration of multiple range images , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[29]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Robust global registration , 2005, SGP '05.

[30]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[31]  Umberto Castellani,et al.  Sparse points matching by combining 3D mesh saliency with statistical descriptors , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[32]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .