Radio telemetry as a tool for impact assessment of wind farms: the case of Little Terns Sterna albifrons at Scroby Sands, Norfolk, UK

Many seabirds travel widely to exploit variably distributed prey resources, utilizing even profitable patches only briefly as prey become available. Assessing the relative importance of areas occupied by wind farms relies on sufficient survey effort to increase the probability of detection and later assessment to an acceptable level. Conventional techniques suffer from high sampling costs and infrequent sampling of patches within larger areas. Remote techniques, which continuously sample habitat, may offer a solution although sufficient coverage may be difficult to achieve. In this paper, we outline experiences of the use of radio telemetry on LittleTerns Sterna albifrons at their most important UK breeding site, the Great Yarmouth North Denes Special Protection Area (SPA), in relation to a 30 turbine offshore wind farm on Scroby Sands, which encroaches to 2 km from the North Denes colony. Little Terns had not been radio-tagged previously in the UK, and the technical difficulties of tagging and subsequently following a small (55 g) diving seabird limited data collection. However, comparative data from 2 years (2003 and 2004), in which the abundance of the terns’ preferred prey varied greatly, revealed striking differences in activity and foraging patterns, which changed the perception of the scope of the birds. With an active nest, birds occupied a range of < 6.3 km2 with a range span of up to 4.6 km. In comparison, failed birds ranged widely, occupying ranges up to 52 km2 and travelling up to 27 km in a single foraging bout. As birds were recorded from 2 to 3 km offshore, the wind farm is within range of birds from the breeding colony at North Denes, although only a small proportion of foraging time was spent at such distance in the years of study. The potential value of radio (and satellite) telemetry in illustrating habitat use, perhaps to set precautionary distance limits for wind farms as well as defining actual use of particular areas including for collision risk assessment is discussed.

[1]  John P. Croxall,et al.  Foraging ecology and interactions with fisheries of wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) breeding at South Georgia , 2004 .

[2]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Regime shifts in the breeding of an Atlantic puffin population , 2004 .

[3]  S. Hansson,et al.  Predicting herring recruitment from young‐of‐the‐year densities, spawning stock biomass, and climate , 2003 .

[4]  R. Furness,et al.  Diet and nest attendance of incubating and chick-rearing northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) in Shetland , 2001 .

[5]  S. Wanless,et al.  Foraging ranges, diets and feeding locations of gannets Morus bassanus in the North Sea:evidence from satellite telemetry , 2000 .

[6]  Paul R. Moorcroft,et al.  Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model , 1999 .

[7]  Stephen Harris,et al.  Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals , 1990 .

[8]  Barbara W. Massey,et al.  Adverse effects of radio transmitters on the behavior of nesting Least Terns , 1988 .

[9]  D. Mehlman,et al.  The UK SPA network: Its Scope and Content , 2003 .

[10]  D. Mehlman The UK SPA Network: Its Scope and Content D. A. Stroud D. Chambers S. Cook N. Buxton B. Fraser P. Clement P. Lewis I. McLean H. Baker S. Whitehead , 2003 .

[11]  T. Anker‐Nilssen,et al.  Factors affecting the recruitment variability of the Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.) , 2002 .

[12]  Nils Warnock,et al.  Attachment of radio-transmitters to sandpipers: review and methods , 1993 .

[13]  S. Cramp Terns to woodpeckers , 1985 .

[14]  Mary Virginia Brubeck The Effects of Trapping, Banding, and Patagial Tagging on the Parental Behavior of Least Terns in Texas , 1981 .

[15]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .