Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Generalization in Patients With Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Background This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting 1- and 2-year generalization probabilities in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). Methods In total, 501 eligible patients with OMG treated at seven tertiary hospitals in China between January 2015 and May 2019 were included. The primary outcome measure was disease generalization. A nomogram for predicting 1- and 2-year generalization probabilities was constructed using a stepwise Cox regression model. Nomogram performance was quantified using C-indexes and calibration curves. Two-year cumulative generalization rates were analyzed using the Kaplan−Meier method for distinct nomogram-stratified risk groups. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Result The eligible patients were randomly divided into a development cohort (n=351, 70%) and a validation cohort (n=150, 30%). The final model included five variables: sex, onset age, repetitive nerve stimulation findings, acetylcholine receptor antibody test results, and thymic status. The model demonstrated good discrimination (C-indexes of 0.733 and 0.788 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively) and calibration, with good agreement between actual and nomogram-estimated generalization probabilities. Kaplan−Meier curves revealed higher 2-year cumulative generalization rates in the high-risk group than that in the low-risk group. DCA demonstrated a higher net benefit of nomogram-assisted decisions compared to treatment of all patients or none. Conclusion The nomogram model can predict 1- and 2-year generalization probabilities in patients with OMG and stratified these patients into distinct generalization risk groups. The nomogram has potential to aid neurologists in selecting suitable patients for initiating immunotherapy and for enrolment in clinical trials of risk-modifying treatments.

[1]  M. Zhang,et al.  Association of immunosuppression treatment with generalization among patients with ocular myasthenia gravis: A propensity score analysis , 2022, European journal of neurology.

[2]  Tao Lei,et al.  Risk Factors for Generalization in Patients with Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study , 2021, Neurology and Therapy.

[3]  G. Cutter,et al.  If Thymectomy Reduces the Risk of Progression of Ocular to Generalized Myasthenia Gravis, Who Should Receive it? , 2021, Neurotherapeutics.

[4]  F. Gao,et al.  Thymectomy and Risk of Generalization in Patients with Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study , 2021, Neurotherapeutics.

[5]  Xiaoguang Luo,et al.  Clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate encephalitis-a single-center, retrospective analysis in China. , 2021, Frontiers in bioscience.

[6]  S. Luo,et al.  Adult Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Conversion: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis in China , 2020, European Neurology.

[7]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model , 2020, BMJ.

[8]  S. Jariyakosol,et al.  Factors Affecting Generalization of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis in Patients with Positive Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Y. Geng,et al.  Rapid improvement of muscle weakness post‐thymectomy indicates good long‐term neurological outcome in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis , 2019, European journal of neurology.

[10]  D. Hodge,et al.  Incidence, Epidemiology, and Transformation of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Population Based Study. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes , 2018, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Nichelli,et al.  Antibody profile may predict outcome in ocular myasthenia gravis , 2018, Acta Neurologica Belgica.

[13]  D. Milea,et al.  Low conversion rate of ocular to generalized myasthenia gravis in Singapore , 2018, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  A. Villa,et al.  Prognosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis in an Argentinian Population , 2018, European Neurology.

[15]  P. Nichelli,et al.  Factors affecting outcome in ocular myasthenia gravis , 2018, The International journal of neuroscience.

[16]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Clinical predictors for the prognosis of myasthenia gravis , 2017, BMC Neurology.

[17]  J. Lemos,et al.  Clinical Utility of Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody Testing in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[18]  W. Lau,et al.  Prognostic nomogram for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. , 2015, Journal of hepatology.

[19]  J. Lemos,et al.  Prognosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[20]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  Propensity Score Analysis , 2015 .

[21]  F. Zimprich,et al.  The effect of early prednisolone treatment on the generalization rate in ocular myasthenia gravis , 2013, European journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Sanders,et al.  Immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis , 2010, Autoimmunity.

[23]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures , 2010, Epidemiology.

[24]  M. Kupersmith Ocular myasthenia gravis: treatment successes and failures in patients with long-term follow-up , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[25]  Elena B. Elkin,et al.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[26]  Yoon-Ho Hong,et al.  Prognosis of ocular myasthenia in Korea: A retrospective multicenter analysis of 202 patients , 2008, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[27]  M. Pagala,et al.  Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis , 2008, Muscle & nerve.

[28]  J. Shrager,et al.  Outcomes after 151 extended transcervical thymectomies for myasthenia gravis. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  N. Perkins,et al.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Goldstein,et al.  The effect of prednisone on the progression from ocular to generalized myasthenia gravis , 2004, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  J. King,et al.  Immunotherapy of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Reduces Conversion to Generalized Myasthenia Gravis , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[32]  M. Kupersmith,et al.  Development of generalized disease at 2 years in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[33]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Ocular myasthenia gravis: response to long term immunosuppressive treatment , 1997 .

[34]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Ocular myasthenia gravis: response to long-term immunosuppressive treatment. , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[35]  M. Moster,et al.  Beneficial effects of corticosteroids on ocular myasthenia gravis. , 1996, Archives of neurology.

[36]  S. Leeder,et al.  A population based study , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[37]  H. Oosterhuis The natural course of myasthenia gravis: a long term follow up study. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[38]  D. Grob,et al.  The Course of Myasthenia Gravis and Therapies Affecting Outcome a , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Thymectomy in myasthenia with pure ocular symptoms. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[40]  C. Bever,et al.  Prognosis of ocular myasthenia , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[41]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[42]  Nils E Gilhus Myasthenia Gravis. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  J. Barton,et al.  Ocular Aspects of Myasthenia Gravis , 2000, Seminars in neurology.

[44]  J. Epstein,et al.  A long-term follow-up study , 1997 .