Field Calibration of Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors

Abstract. To implement effective policies and strategies to control air pollution, it is crucial to obtain accurate air quality data. Stationary air monitoring stations (AMSs) help local authorities and environmental agencies in achieving these goals; however, these measurements have limitations. AMSs provide detailed temporal data on air quality, but only at discrete locations at relatively high cost. An alternative method, low-cost mobile air quality monitoring (LCMAQM) sensors, complement AMSs. LCMAQM sensors can cover larger areas and the cost of typical sensors for LCMAQM are $150–200 each. We have developed a wireless Mobile Autonomous Air Quality Sensor box (MAAQSbox) to measure air pollution. The MAAQSbox contains LCMAQM sensors (gas and particle) and a wireless broadcasting system, which enables autonomous field operation for varied mobile applications. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3) gases are measured by B4 sensors. Particulate matter (PM2.5) is measured by OPC-N2. A field calibration has been performed by making side by side measurements with the MAAQSbox and Minnesota Pollution Agency AMS. The calibrations of LCMAQM sensors were determined by multivariate linear regressions (MLR). MLR results for all sensors were improved by including the temperature and relative humidity as independent variables. The R2 of CO, NO, NO2, and O3 gas sensors are 0.96, 0.97, 0.81, and 0.95 respectively, while the R2 of PM2.5 particle sensor is 0.6. B4 sensors are sensitive to ambient conditions such as temperature and relative humidity. The results with OPC-N2 differs from the AMS indicating further developments are needed to enable more accurate PM2.5 measurements.

[1]  Kwong-Sak Leung,et al.  A Modular Plug-And-Play Sensor System for Urban Air Pollution Monitoring: Design, Implementation and Evaluation , 2017, Sensors.

[2]  W. Lahoz,et al.  Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. , 2017, Environment international.

[3]  M. Brauer,et al.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Mobile technologies and personalized environmental information for supporting sustainable mobility in Oslo: The Citi-Sense-MOB approach , 2014, EnviroInfo.

[6]  Michele Penza,et al.  Urban Air Quality Monitoring with Networked Low-Cost Sensor-Systems , 2017 .

[7]  B. Weinzierl,et al.  On the parametrization of optical particle counter response including instrument-induced broadening of size spectra and a self-consistent evaluation of calibration measurements , 2017 .

[8]  J. Ortega,et al.  Low-cost measurement techniques to characterize the influence of home heating fuel on carbon monoxide in Navajo homes. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Alena Bartonova,et al.  An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  A. Robinson,et al.  Closing the gap on lower cost air quality monitoring: machine learning calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance , 2017 .

[11]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[12]  Jonathan P. Franklin,et al.  Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments , 2017 .

[13]  Li Sun,et al.  Impact Analysis of Temperature and Humidity Conditions on Electrochemical Sensor Response in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[14]  Laura Hallett,et al.  Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108) , 2016, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[15]  R. Hanna,et al.  Does the Effect of Pollution on Infant Mortality Differ Between Developed and Developing Countries? Evidence from Mexico City , 2012 .

[16]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide (cid:2) , 2022 .

[17]  Alena Bartonova,et al.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? , 2017, Environment international.

[18]  Geb Thomas,et al.  Evaluation of low-cost electro-chemical sensors for environmental monitoring of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide , 2018, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[19]  Elena Austin,et al.  Ambient Air Quality Measurements from a Continuously Moving Mobile Platform: Estimation of Area-Wide, Fuel-Based, Mobile Source Emission Factors Using Absolute Principal Component Scores. , 2017, Atmospheric environment.

[21]  S. Goodman.  A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. , 2008, Seminars in hematology.

[22]  Lila Ricci,et al.  Adjusted R-squared type measure for exponential dispersion models , 2010 .

[23]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements , 2017 .