The Tailless Nuclear Receptor Acts as a Dedicated Repressor in the Early Drosophila Embryo

ABSTRACT Tailless is an orphan nuclear receptor that controls terminal body patterning in Drosophila. Genetic analyses have revealed both positive and negative regulatory interactions of Tailless with various target genes, leading to the idea that, like many other nuclear receptors, Tailless mediates both activation and repression of transcription. In this paper, we have examined the consequences of converting Tailless into an obligate repressor and compared the activities of the resulting protein with those of wild-type Tailless. We find that this repressor form of Tailless behaves like the intact protein in gain- and loss-of-function experiments, being sufficient to support normal embryonic development and establish accurate patterns of gene expression even for positive Tailless targets such as hunchback and brachyenteron. This suggests that Tailless functions exclusively as a transcriptional repressor in the embryo and that the observed positive interactions of Tailless with specific targets are secondary effects involving repression of repressors. We provide evidence that knirps is one such repressor gene acting between Tailless and its indirect positive targets. Finally, our results indicate that Tailless exerts an active mechanism of repression via its ligand-binding domain and that this activity is largely independent of the activation function 2 (AF2) motif characteristic of most nuclear receptors.

[1]  K. Umesono,et al.  The orphan nuclear receptor Tlx regulates Pax2 and is essential for vision. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  T. Cline,et al.  The primary sex determination signal of Drosophila acts at the level of transcription , 1992, Cell.

[3]  M Hoch,et al.  Spatial control of the gap gene knirps in the Drosophila embryo by posterior morphogen system. , 1992, Science.

[4]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Control and function of terminal gap gene activity in the posterior pole region of the Drosophila embryo , 1991, Mechanisms of Development.

[5]  M. Bate,et al.  The development of Drosophila melanogaster , 1993 .

[6]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  X:A ratio, the primary sex-determining signal in Drosophila, is transduced by helix-loop-helix proteins , 1990, Cell.

[7]  K. Umesono,et al.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade , 1995, Cell.

[8]  M. Levine,et al.  Spatial regulation of the gap gene giant during Drosophila development. , 1991, Development.

[9]  Dmitri Papatsenko,et al.  A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila , 2003, Nature.

[10]  K. Umesono,et al.  Relationship between Drosophila gap gene tailless and a vertebrate nuclear receptor Tlx , 1994, Nature.

[11]  J. C. Li,et al.  Development in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. , 1927, Genetics.

[12]  Alfred L. Fisher,et al.  Groucho proteins: transcriptional corepressors for specific subsets of DNA-binding transcription factors in vertebrates and invertebrates. , 1998, Genes & development.

[13]  Kendall W Nettles,et al.  Ligand control of coregulator recruitment to nuclear receptors. , 2005, Annual review of physiology.

[14]  Robert J. Diaz,et al.  The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily , 1990, Cell.

[15]  J. Posakony,et al.  Posterior stripe expression of hunchback is driven from two promoters by a common enhancer element. , 1995, Development.

[16]  V. Hartenstein,et al.  Complex regulatory region mediating tailless expression in early embryonic patterning and brain development. , 1997, Development.

[17]  E. Bellefroid,et al.  The Xenopus homologue of the Drosophila gene tailless has a function in early eye development. , 1998, Development.

[18]  M. Levine,et al.  The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[19]  G. Chinnadurai,et al.  CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[20]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Huckebein repressor activity in Drosophila terminal patterning is mediated by Groucho. , 1999, Development.

[21]  M. Mckeown,et al.  SMRTER, a Drosophila nuclear receptor coregulator, reveals that EcR-mediated repression is critical for development. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[22]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Torso signalling regulates terminal patterning in Drosophila by antagonising Groucho-mediated repression. , 1997, Development.

[23]  M. Levine,et al.  dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[24]  E. Steingrímsson,et al.  Dual role of the Drosophila pattern gene tailless in embryonic termini. , 1991, Science.

[25]  M. Mckeown,et al.  dissatisfaction Encodes a Tailless-like Nuclear Receptor Expressed in a Subset of CNS Neurons Controlling Drosophila Sexual Behavior , 1998, Neuron.

[26]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Sp1/egr-like zinc-finger protein required for endoderm specification and germ-layer formation in Drosophila , 1994, Nature.

[27]  Y. Jan,et al.  deadpan, an essential pan-neural gene encoding an HLH protein, acts as a denominator in Drosophila sex determination , 1992, Cell.

[28]  G. Hauptmann,et al.  Two-color whole-mount in situ hybridization to vertebrate and Drosophila embryos. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  R. Fletterick,et al.  TR surfaces and conformations required to bind nuclear receptor corepressor. , 2002, Molecular endocrinology.

[30]  K. Umesono,et al.  A Unified Nomenclature System for the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily , 1999, Cell.

[31]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional repression in development. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[32]  Neil J. McKenna,et al.  Combinatorial Control of Gene Expression by Nuclear Receptors and Coregulators , 2002, Cell.

[33]  M. Bownes,et al.  Drosophila: A practical approach: edited by D. B. Roberts IRL Press, 1986. £26.00/$47.00 (xix + 295 pages) ISBN 0 94746 66 7 , 1987 .

[34]  S. Jia,et al.  Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. , 2001, Genes & development.

[35]  M Hoch,et al.  Competition for overlapping sites in the regulatory region of the Drosophila gene Krüppel. , 1992, Science.

[36]  A. Cooney,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of COUP-TF-mediated transcriptional repression: evidence for transrepression and active repression , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  M. Levine,et al.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Development.

[38]  G. Jiménez,et al.  In vivo interactions of the Drosophila Hairy and Runt transcriptional repressors with target promoters. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[39]  M. Lazar,et al.  A Novel Role for Helix 12 of Retinoid X Receptor in Regulating Repression , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[40]  E. McCabe,et al.  Nuclear receptors and genetic disease , 2001 .

[41]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy‐interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and Hairy‐mediated transcriptional repression , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[42]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  Sex determination and dosage compensation: lessons from flies and worms. , 1994, Science.

[43]  J. Lengyel,et al.  Graded requirement for the zygotic terminal gene, tailless, in the brain and tail region of the Drosophila embryo. , 1988, Development.

[44]  P. Gass,et al.  Defective limbic system in mice lacking the tailless gene , 1997, Nature.

[45]  M. Lazar,et al.  A Dominant-negative Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) Mutant Is a Constitutive Repressor and Inhibits PPARγ-mediated Adipogenesis* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  K. Gaston,et al.  Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes: repressors and repression mechanisms , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[47]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Specificity for the hairy/enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins maps outside the bHLH domain and suggests two separable modes of transcriptional repression , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[48]  Mike Rothe,et al.  Loss of gene function through rapid mitotic cycles in the Drosophila embryo , 1992, Nature.

[49]  J. Singer,et al.  Graded effect of tailless on posterior gut development: molecular basis of an allelic series of a nuclear receptor gene , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[50]  M Klingler,et al.  Two gap genes mediate maternal terminal pattern information in Drosophila. , 1990, Science.

[51]  Li-Na Wei,et al.  Mechanisms of the Mouse Orphan Nuclear Receptor TR2-11-mediated Gene Suppression* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed. , 1997, Genes & development.

[53]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Krüppel requirement for knirps enhancement reflects overlapping gap gene activities in the Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[54]  B. Herrmann,et al.  Homologs of the mouse Brachyury gene are involved in the specification of posterior terminal structures in Drosophila, Tribolium, and Locusta. , 1994, Genes & development.

[55]  D. Arnosti,et al.  Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps , 2004, Development.

[56]  V. Hartenstein,et al.  Control of early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain by the head gap genes tll, otd, ems, and btd. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[57]  D. Hogness,et al.  The E75 ecdysone-inducible gene responsible for the 75B early puff in Drosophila encodes two new members of the steroid receptor superfamily. , 1990, Genes & development.

[58]  G. Jiménez,et al.  Relief of gene repression by torso RTK signaling: role of capicua in Drosophila terminal and dorsoventral patterning. , 2000, Genes & development.

[59]  H. Jäckle,et al.  The homeotic gene fork head encodes a nuclear protein and is expressed in the terminal regions of the Drosophila embryo , 1989, Cell.

[60]  J. Singer,et al.  Drosophila brachyenteron regulates gene activity and morphogenesis in the gut. , 1996, Development.

[61]  P. Chambon,et al.  Activation function 2 (AF‐2) of retinoic acid receptor and 9‐cis retinoic acid receptor: presence of a conserved autonomous constitutive activating domain and influence of the nature of the response element on AF‐2 activity. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[62]  Frances M. Sladek,et al.  Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4α , 2001 .

[63]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Mechanism and Bicoid‐dependent control of hairy stripe 7 expression in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[64]  J. Lengyel,et al.  The torso response element binds GAGA and NTF-1/Elf-1, and regulates tailless by relief of repression. , 1995, Genes & development.

[65]  J. Casanova,et al.  Pattern formation under the control of the terminal system in the Drosophila embryo. , 1990, Development.